With Rare Support, Chemical Security Legislation Advances in House

Fire department personnel walk among the remains of an apartment complex next to the fertilizer plant that exploded in April 2013 in West, Texas. House lawmakers are advancing legislation meant to extend the life of a Homeland Security Department program meant to help shield such facilities from terrorist attacks.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
April 3, 2014, 10:50 a.m.

A House sub­com­mit­tee on Thursday moved le­gis­la­tion meant to ex­tend the life of the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment’s chem­ic­al-se­cur­ity pro­gram that — for the first time in years — ap­pears to have the sup­port of both House com­mit­tees with jur­is­dic­tion over the is­sue.

Nu­mer­ous ef­forts by the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee to pass le­gis­la­tion provid­ing long-term au­thor­iz­a­tion for DHS chem­ic­al-fa­cil­ity an­ti­ter­ror­ism stand­ards in re­cent years have failed, largely due to dis­agree­ments with the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee, which also over­sees the mat­ter.

However, the latest in­carn­a­tion of the bill — which Rep­res­ent­at­ive Patrick Mee­han (R-Penn.) first in­tro­duced in Feb­ru­ary and which has been backed by House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mi­chael Mc­Caul (R-Texas) — has been de­veloped with as­sist­ance from House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee staffers, a Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee aide told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire. The aide was not au­thor­ized to dis­cuss the is­sue pub­licly and asked not to be named.

At a hear­ing in Feb­ru­ary, Rep­res­ent­at­ive Ben­nie Thompson (D-Miss.) sug­ges­ted that the bill could ac­tu­ally in­crease jur­is­dic­tion­al ten­sions between com­mit­tees. He also raised con­cerns that the le­gis­la­tion would do little to re­form many con­tro­ver­sial as­pects of the DHS pro­gram, which is aimed at help­ing shield com­mer­cial chem­ic­al fa­cil­it­ies from ter­ror­ist at­tacks that could prove deadly to sur­round­ing com­munit­ies.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), the top Demo­crat on the Home­land Se­cur­ity Sub­com­mit­tee on Cy­ber­se­cur­ity, In­fra­struc­ture Pro­tec­tion and Se­cur­ity Tech­no­lo­gies, said on Thursday that pan­el Re­pub­lic­ans had “paid at­ten­tion to some of the con­cerns” Demo­crats raised in Feb­ru­ary dur­ing the pro­cess of draft­ing an amended ver­sion of the bill.

The sub­com­mit­tee ap­proved the amended bill by a un­an­im­ous voice vote on Thursday. However, Clarke and oth­er Demo­crats said they still had sev­er­al con­cerns with the le­gis­la­tion that they hoped to have ad­dressed pri­or to a fu­ture vote by the full com­mit­tee.

Dur­ing Thursday’s markup ses­sion, Clarke and Rep­res­ent­at­ive Steven Horsford (D-Nev.) offered sev­er­al ad­di­tion­al amend­ments to the bill, nearly all of which were re­jec­ted on party-line votes.

Among the failed Demo­crat­ic amend­ments was one Clarke offered in an at­tempt to ad­dress her con­cerns that the bill could al­low DHS to out­source the in­spec­tion of chem­ic­al fa­cil­it­ies to private con­tract­ors.

“I have re­ser­va­tions about the use of con­tract­ors in the in­spect­or cadre, where this work is gen­er­ally re­cog­nized as an in­her­ently gov­ern­ment­al re­spons­ib­il­ity, es­pe­cially when it in­volves ter­ror­ist threats and risks to the na­tion,” she said.

In ur­ging his fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans to vote against the amend­ment, Mee­han, the sub­com­mit­tee chair­man, noted that the En­ergy De­part­ment routinely out­sources sens­it­ive na­tion­al se­cur­ity work to the private con­tract­ors that run the na­tion­al labor­at­or­ies and oth­er nuc­le­ar weapons fa­cil­it­ies.

Also re­jec­ted was an amend­ment by Clarke meant to ad­dress her con­cerns that wa­ter and wastewa­ter fa­cil­it­ies — which of­ten deal with dan­ger­ous chem­ic­als — are ex­empt from the DHS pro­gram.

A failed amend­ment by Horsford would have ad­ded whis­tleblower pro­tec­tions to chem­ic­al fa­cil­ity em­ploy­ees who wish to flag po­ten­tial se­cur­ity con­cerns without pla­cing their em­ploy­ment status in jeop­ardy. Horsford cited re­cent con­cerns that whis­tleblowers who raised safety con­cerns at the Han­ford nuc­le­ar weapons waste site had lost their jobs in re­tali­ation

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×