A key U.S. senator plans to press Obama officials to circulate details on a weapon-uranium processing plan devised by a specially convened “Red Team.”
A spokesman said Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) will call on U.S. nuclear-arms managers to air “as much information as possible” on the draft proposal, which experts are developing as an alternative to a multibillion-dollar uranium complex planned in his state.
The “Red Team” began its review at the Y-12 National Security Complex last month. In prior years, efforts to plan a new Uranium Processing Facility at the Oak Ridge site have hit numerous delays and cost overruns.
“Senator Alexander wants to see the Uranium Processing Facility completed under budget and on time,” spokesman Jim Jeffries told Global Security Newswire in an e-mailed response to questions.
“He plans to participate in an April 30 budget hearing that will be open to the public, and he will encourage the National Nuclear Security Administration to publicly release as much information as possible on the Red Team review without undermining national security.”
Alexander’s office issued the comments after a watchdog group in his state voiced concerns about the “secrecy” of the Red Team’s work.
“When the secret Red Team completes its review, the results of that review must be made public,” Ralph Hutchison, coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance, told the lawmaker in a Tuesday letter.
The Red Team reportedly plans in coming weeks to revise its alternative plan for relocating bomb-uranium activities from a 1940s-era structure. Upon completion, the preliminary proposal would go to NNSA Acting Administrator Bruce Held for consideration.
Initial Energy Department estimates were for the Uranium Processing Facility to be built for no more than $1.1 billion. But the cost projections have grown more than sixfold, with some forecasting that the total could hit nearly $20 billion if the original plans were to go forward.
Hutchison said further scrutiny of the alternative uranium plan may be necessary to determine its environmental impact. However, he suggested that Held’s agency — a semi-independent Energy Department office in charge of U.S. nuclear-weapons operations — would likely argue that the proposal is covered under the Y-12 facility’s existing site-wide environmental impact statement.
“The public must be consulted in a meaningful way in planning for significant government actions,” Hutchison wrote in the letter, first reported by the Knoxville News Sentinel. “It’s not just that the public is more willing to buy-in if it feels included — it is that the decisions finally made are better decisions.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.