Even as President Obama signed a Ukraine aid package into law Thursday that also punishes Russia, lawmakers remained skeptical that Russian President Vladimir Putin would be deterred.
“We need to do everything we can to dissuade Putin from being even more expansionary,” said Sen. Ron Johnson, who did not specify what stronger steps the U.S. should take but said they should have more “resolve.” “Putin only responds to action, he doesn’t respond to words. There’s a whole host of things we can do to make sure that we change his calculus that if he moves further into Ukraine, there’d be a much higher price to pay across the board.”
Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, was among a number of Senate Foreign Relations Committee members who expressed continued unease Thursday about Putin’s ambitions in Ukraine and the surrounding region.
Committee members openly debated whether additional action would be needed after they left a classified briefing on Russia with officials from the departments of State and Defense as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
After Russia’s incursion into Crimea in late February, which resulted in its annexation of the region last month, Congress finally sent a Ukraine aid package to the White House on Tuesday that also seeks to punish Russia by codifying sanctions against Putin’s allies.
The panel’s ranking member, Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee, said that if Putin continues on the same course, more action could be warranted.
“I think another week of troop buildup on the border and nothing changing, maybe so,” he said.
Others argued the key was to keep ratcheting up pressure on Putin through sanctions.
“The sooner we can convince the Europeans to move forward on the next set of economic sanctions, the tighter the noose will be around Putin,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat. “Putin thinks he can negotiate his way into a federal system that will cleave off eastern Ukraine in recognition of their occupation of Crimea. I think we need to move forward on economic sanctions as quickly as possible to make it clear that there will be a continued cost to them if they are not negotiating in good faith.”
For his part, committee Chairman Sen. Robert Menendez was tight-lipped about what steps, if any, should be taken next in Congress.
“It remains to be seen,” the New Jersey Democrat said. “But we are certainly poised to do more if we have to, if we think it will be a deterrent towards any further Russian aggression.”
Menendez added that the Ukraine package Obama signed into law Thursday sends an important message to Russia.
“It’s significant because No. 1, not only does it codify some of the actions that the president took, but it expands upon it,” he said. “And clearly some of the consequences of those actions felt by those closest to Putin have been significant. It’s like standing in a circle and all of a sudden everyone in the circle is getting a bomb thrown on them and you get the message that it’s getting close.”
Separately on Thursday, Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member James Inhofe, R-Okla., introduced a resolution to stop further Russian aggression and preserve Moldova’s sovereignty, which demands Russia withdraw from the region.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.