Senators are pressing President Obama to develop a strategy to combat Syria’s humanitarian aid crisis, but there’s one problem: how to get around Russia.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday that calls for Obama to submit a strategy to Congress that deals with combating Syria’s humanitarian crisis and human-rights violations in the country and region.
Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida said Senate passage would “send a clear message to Obama administration that we need a new humanitarian strategy that includes concrete actions to increase pressure on [Syrian President Bashar al-Assad].”
The United States has donated $1.7 billion aimed at helping those within Syria impacted by the civil war, and refugees in nearby countries, according to the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The resolution, cosponsored by Rubio and Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, also presses for the international community to back an increase in humanitarian-aid access and a decrease in various forms of violence, which is where things get a little tricky.
The U.N. Security Council, which includes the United States and Russia, passed a resolution earlier this year, which the Senate’s bill backs, that calls for increased access for humanitarian aid and a decrease in violence and condemns al-Qaida backed activities in the country.
But an initial draft of the resolution was scrapped after Russia threatened to veto it. (Russia is one of five countries that have veto power on the council. The others are the United States, United Kingdom, France, and China.)
And Russia’s U.N. ambassador stressed that the resolution doesn’t pave the way for sanctions against the Syrian government overseen by Assad, which Russia supports.
Security Council members could take “further steps” if the resolution isn’t complied with — as suggested by a recently leaked U.N. report — but those steps would have to be agreed to by the five permanent members.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power told reporters last week that the United States will begin taking steps to make sure the resolution is being carried out. Asked about what those next steps could be, she said, “This is a consultation, there’s nothing that I can do and that we can do unilaterally to make the council do what we want.”
Russia has vetoed three Security Council resolutions since the start of Syria’s Civil War, but officials have remained cautiously optimistic that the current tensions on Ukraine won’t spill over.
Power did acknowledge that “it is no secret” that the U.S. and Russian perspectives “on this issue have been deeply divergent for a long time.”
- 1 High Court Vacancy Spells Trouble for Congress
- 2 Why Four Justices Were Against the Supreme Court’s Huge Gay-Marriage Decision
- 3 The Winners and Losers From the South Carolina Republican Debate
- 4 Bush Family Values Pit Jeb Against Grover Norquist
- 5 How (Arrogant, Prickly, Smart) John Kasich Would Upend 2016
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.