Lawmakers Challenge Obama’s Spending Authority to Halt Plutonium Project

Global Security Newswire Staff
April 1, 2014, 9:36 a.m.

Twenty-one law­makers on Monday said Pres­id­ent Obama can­not draw from a plutoni­um-con­ver­sion plant’s con­struc­tion fund to keep the pro­ject on hold.

The En­ergy De­part­ment’s 2015 budget pro­pos­al calls for paus­ing work on the un­fin­ished plant, which would con­vert bomb plutoni­um in­to mixed-ox­ide re­act­or fuel at the Sa­van­nah River Site in South Car­o­lina. The MOX fa­cil­ity con­struc­tion began after Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow agreed to be­gin in 2018 to elim­in­ate plutoni­um from their stock­piles.

Con­gress “ex­pli­citly” des­ig­nated funds in fisc­al 2014 for “con­struc­tion” of the fa­cil­ity, the le­gis­lat­ors said in a let­ter to En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz. Missive sign­ers in­cluded South Car­o­lina’s sev­en House rep­res­ent­at­ives, as well as law­makers from Flor­ida, Geor­gia, Louisi­ana, Ten­ness­ee, North Car­o­lina, Vir­gin­ia and Wash­ing­ton state.

“The funds were not au­thor­ized or ap­pro­pri­ated for cold-standby, and we re­quest they be used only for con­struc­tion as Con­gress in­ten­ded,” the let­ter says. “The in­tent of Con­gress is be­ing ig­nored and as a res­ult we may see a usurp­a­tion of Con­gress’ power of the purse.”

The law­makers ad­ded they had “nev­er seen” how the Army Corps of En­gin­eers de­term­ined that the MOX plant would cost $30 bil­lion to build and main­tain, and they pressed for dis­clos­ure of the cal­cu­la­tions.

“Moreover, we re­quest a study to ana­lyze the cost as­so­ci­ated with pla­cing MOX in­to cold-standby, which is es­tim­ated to be between $700 and $900 mil­lion,” they wrote.

Mean­while, con­struc­tion of the MOX fa­cil­ity is pro­ceed­ing, us­ing cur­rent-year funds, the Au­gusta Chron­icle re­por­ted on Monday.

“We con­tin­ue build­ing the MOX Fuel Fab­ric­a­tion Fa­cil­ity un­der our [fisc­al year] 2014 budget and dir­ec­tion,” Kelly Trice, pres­id­ent of Shaw Areva MOX Ser­vices, said in a state­ment to site work­ers.

What We're Following See More »
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
46 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
27TH AMENDMENT
Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
7 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

×