A Hague Summit Dispatch: From Scripted Press Briefs to Propaganda Videos

President Obama waves as he walks up the stairs of Air Force One before leaving Amsterdam, Netherlands, on March 25. The leader attended a two-day Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague.
National Journal
Sebastian Sprenger
March 28, 2014, 11:14 a.m.

THE HAG­UE, NETH­ER­LANDS — Glob­al polit­ics has a funny way of play­ing out in mi­cro­cosm when lead­er­ship sum­mits are largely scrip­ted in ad­vance.

That cer­tainly was the case dur­ing this week’s 2014 Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit, hos­ted here by the Dutch gov­ern­ment.

The two-day gath­er­ing of 53 world lead­ers to dis­cuss ways of keep­ing sens­it­ive atom­ic ma­ter­i­als out of the hands of ter­ror­ists was to be­gin at 1:30 p.m. on Monday. Yet by mid-morn­ing, the U.S. del­eg­a­tion had already can­celed a noon press con­fer­ence — no­tori­ously un­pre­dict­able af­fairs, and per­haps even more so with for­eign press in­volved.

U.S. En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz and Yosuke Isoza­ki, a Ja­pan­ese na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­viser, did hold a Monday press event, where they read an an­nounce­ment on the re­mov­al of weapons-us­able nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al from the is­land na­tion.

Re­port­ers were poised to vol­ley ques­tions — like, say, about po­ten­tial U.S. se­cur­ity con­cerns re­gard­ing nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als not covered un­der the new bi­lat­er­al agree­ment or ap­par­ent lapses in guard­ing Ja­pan­ese fa­cil­it­ies where bomb-us­able plutoni­um is held.

But in­stead the event ended pre­cip­it­ously with the two lead­ers shak­ing hands for the cam­er­as — and with roar­ing ap­plause from what ap­peared to be a con­tin­gent of Ja­pan­ese gov­ern­ment staffers sit­ting among the re­port­ers.

Mon­iz would ap­pear in a sim­il­ar format the next day, this time with Dutch For­eign Min­is­ter Frans Tim­mer­mans and South Korean For­eign Min­is­ter Yun By­ung-se. The top­ic this time was a tri-na­tion­al ini­ti­at­ive aim­ing to in­sti­tu­tion­al­ize nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity prac­tices world­wide.

An aide an­nounced ahead of time that no ques­tions would be taken, and the lead­ers were quickly whisked out of the packed room fol­low­ing their state­ments. “Tight sched­ules” were to blame, re­port­ers were told.

Some gov­ern­ments offered great­er ac­cess to their do­mest­ic me­dia in ad­mit­ting re­port­ers to their events.

Rus­sia — per­haps sens­ing a need for deep­er in­ter­na­tion­al un­der­stand­ing of its motives lately — proved to be al­most an ex­em­plary ex­cep­tion to the rule. Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergey Lav­rov‘s Monday af­ter­noon press con­fer­ence in­cluded 23 Rus­si­an journ­al­ists and 18 me­dia rep­res­ent­at­ives from else­where.

A dif­fer­ent story at the U.K. del­eg­a­tion. This re­port­er signed up to take part in a Monday press con­fer­ence fea­tur­ing Brit­ish Prime Min­is­ter Dav­id Camer­on. He might have been asked, for in­stance, to re­act to Scot­tish de­mands for his apo­logy about a lack of gov­ern­ment no­ti­fic­a­tion fol­low­ing a ra­di­ation leak at the Doun­reay nuc­le­ar re­act­or.

An of­fi­cial es­cor­ted to the high-se­cur­ity brief­ing room the pack of per­haps a dozen journos — a sus­pi­ciously small group for such a plum event, in hind­sight. Only then did a gen­tle­man with a Brit­ish ac­cent — but look­ing noth­ing like the Con­ser­vat­ive Party lead­er — emerge.

An “em­bar­rass­ing mis­un­der­stand­ing” had oc­curred, he said. Camer­on was in­deed go­ing to hold a press brief­ing, the uniden­ti­fied man told the re­port­ers, but only a “private” one for mem­bers of the U.K. press. Plead­ings from the mostly main­land-Europe press went un­heeded.

Later that af­ter­noon, a press event with Pakistani Prime Min­is­ter Nawaz Sharif was on the sched­ule. Would the Is­lamabad lead­er en­ter­tain the idea of in­clud­ing his coun­try’s grow­ing nuc­le­ar stock­pile in the lar­ger nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity con­ver­sa­tion?

Hav­ing learned a les­son from the scotched U.K. press con­fer­ence, a hand­ful of re­port­ers who gathered to see Sharif began to sus­pect that the ut­ter ab­sence of Pakistani press col­leagues was a ter­rible sign.

A Dutch sum­mit of­fi­cial shared the con­cern and tapped away at his cell phone in at­tempts to de­term­ine why the Pakistani Em­bassy had yet to con­firm the brief­ing.

Fi­nally, cer­tainty, the aide said: No Pakistanis would ap­pear at this press brief­ing, as the prime min­is­ter was said to have plans for at­tend­ing Pres­id­ent Obama’s clos­ing press con­fer­ence with­in the hour. The aide ad­ded that he was ex­pli­citly in­struc­ted not use the word “can­celed,” but didn’t say why.

As the sum­mit wound down, re­port­ers gathered over at the Chinese press cen­ter, where Beijing of­fi­cials were show­ing pro­pa­ganda videos. Miao Wei, Beijing’s min­is­ter of in­dustry and in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy, was nowhere to be seen for his 7 p.m. press event.

A Chinese aide told this re­port­er — in a be­mused but some­what re­proach­ful aside — that Miao was stuck in traffic caused by Obama’s con­voy out of The Hag­ue.

Forty-five minutes later, the min­is­ter ar­rived and told the journ­al­ists — the vast ma­jor­ity of them Chinese — that he would ad­dress every single ques­tion to make up for his tardi­ness. Trans­lated by an in­ter­pret­er, most of the press con­fer­ence played out as a care­fully cho­reo­graphed af­fair, with Miao read­ing re­sponses to ques­tions he ap­peared to have an­ti­cip­ated in de­tail.

A Dutch news­let­ter re­port­er seemed to stump Miao and an ac­com­pa­ny­ing seni­or of­fi­cial from the China Atom­ic En­ergy Au­thor­ity. They were asked about U.S. mil­it­ary ex­er­cises co­in­cid­ing with the 2016 Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit, tent­at­ively slated to take place in Wash­ing­ton, and the pos­sib­il­ity of a germ-war­fare at­tack there. It was time to pack up.

Out­side, the bar­ri­cades and closed streets had be­gun to re­open, and loc­als were now fil­ter­ing in­to the sum­mit com­pound for an even­ing stroll. People on bikes re­claimed their roads from the world’s power­ful.

A loc­al pa­per the next morn­ing fea­tured pho­tos of the vis­it­ing heads of state along­side the head­line, “Het was gezel­lig!” — Dutch for “It’s been cozy.”

What We're Following See More »
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×