The U.S. military is denying what it calls “inaccurate media reports” that armored vehicles and extra military equipment leftover from the war in Afghanistan could be provided to neighboring Pakistan — after Kabul opposed the move described in the press.
“These reports are not correct,” the military said in a statement Thursday. The U.S. military in Afghanistan “does not provide or intend to provide any such equipment, including MRAPs, from Afghanistan to Pakistan.”
The military is trying to get rid of equipment it does not want or need — and would be expensive to transport home — as its draws down troops in Afghanistan. The Washington Post reported earlier this month that the Pentagon was considering giving Pakistan some of the $7 billion worth of excess military equipment, and that Islamabad was particularly interested in the Army’s mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles, or MRAPs.
But the Afghan government had opposed this move. “Afghan security forces need this type of equipment and that as a strategic partner, the U.S. needs to consult with Afghanistan before making such a decision,” a spokesman for Afghan President Hamid Karzai told Voice of America’s Afghan service.
The U.S. is still waiting for Afghanistan to sign a security agreement that could allow a contingent of troops to remain in the country past the end of the year — the deadline for the end of formal combat operations. Since the future partnership between the two countries is in limbo until the agreement is signed, it’s no surprise the U.S. is seeking to reassure Afghanistan’s security forces of its support as it waits for a new Afghan president to be elected this spring.
“Our commitment to the Afghan people and the Afghan National Security Forces is unwavering,” Gen. Joseph Dunford, who commands the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, said in the statement. The U.S. military “remains committed to completing the transformation of the [Afghan National Security Forces] into a professional fighting force capable of meeting their security challenges.”
The military statement also ran through a laundry list of equipment the U.S. has given Afghanistan’s security forces. Over 12 years, the U.S. has provided $53 billion in equipment and support; 160 aircraft; 100,000 vehicles; 500,000 weapons; and 200,000 pieces of communications and night-vision equipment, with more still being delivered.
Whether Afghanistan’s worries are eased or not, Pakistan is not likely to react well. The U.S. is counting on Pakistan to crack down on militants within its borders after this year. Islamabad, which has deployed some 150,000 soldiers along the border with Afghanistan, wanted the armored vehicles to better protect its troops from roadside bombs.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.