Nations Pledge to Follow Security Guidelines for ‘Dirty Bomb’ Material

President Obama chats with New Zealand Prime Minister John Key following the closing session of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit on Tuesday in The Hague, Netherlands. Nearly two dozen countries at the two-day gathering pledged to abide by international guidelines on safeguarding materials potentially usable in a crude nuclear device.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
March 26, 2014, 10:56 a.m.

Twenty-three na­tions par­ti­cip­at­ing in the Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit in the Neth­er­lands this week said they in­tend to com­ply with in­ter­na­tion­al guidelines re­gard­ing the se­cur­ity of so-called “dirty bomb” ma­ter­i­al.

The parties to the mul­ti­lat­er­al state­ment — in­clud­ing the United States and coun­tries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East — pledged to se­cure all their most dan­ger­ous “Cat­egory I” ra­di­olo­gic­al sources un­der guidelines set out by the U.N.’s In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency. Spe­cific­ally, they vowed to fol­low the IAEA “Code of Con­duct on the Safety and Se­cur­ity of Ra­dio­act­ive Sources.”

Ra­di­olo­gic­al sources are those that, if paired with con­ven­tion­al ex­plos­ives, could form a “dirty bomb” that dis­perses ra­dio­act­ive con­tam­in­a­tion over an area, but which can­not pro­duce a nuc­le­ar det­on­a­tion akin to an atom­ic bomb.

This week’s “gift bas­ket” — a term ap­plied mul­tina­tion­al pledges not signed by all 53 na­tions par­ti­cip­at­ing in the sum­mit — had been ex­pec­ted as part of a broad­er ef­fort to inch the sum­mit pro­cess to­ward the es­tab­lish­ment of glob­al stand­ards for nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity. However, this one went fur­ther than some is­sue ex­perts had an­ti­cip­ated.

In a Tues­day blog post, Mat­thew Bunn of Har­vard Uni­versity noted that the par­ti­cip­at­ing coun­tries had pre­vi­ously com­mit­ted to im­ple­ment­ing the IAEA guidelines.

Still, the sum­mit pledge “goes fur­ther, call­ing for meas­ures such as check­ing the trust­wor­thi­ness of people with ac­cess to ra­di­olo­gic­al sources, provid­ing a rap­id re­sponse to any at­tempt to gain ac­cess to them (and car­ry­ing out reg­u­lar ex­er­cises of that re­sponse cap­ab­il­ity), and de­vel­op­ing a na­tion­al-level re­sponse plan based on an in-depth as­sess­ment of the threat,” Bunn wrote.

The gift bas­ket also iden­ti­fies “best prac­tices” that par­ti­cip­at­ing na­tions “may con­sider,” such as re­quir­ing “mul­tiple factors” to be con­firmed be­fore a per­son is per­mit­ted to ac­cess sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­als, along with the in­stall­a­tion of mon­it­or­ing sys­tems with “re­dund­ant and timely alarms “¦ sent to a cent­ral­ized mon­it­or­ing fa­cil­ity.”

Bunn called these prac­tices “more ven­ture­some” than oth­er ini­ti­at­ives to which na­tions had pre­vi­ously com­mit­ted. The former nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity ad­viser to Pres­id­ent Clin­ton cri­ti­cized the pledge for not in­clud­ing lan­guage re­gard­ing the trans­port of ra­di­olo­gic­al sources, though.

Led by Ja­pan, five coun­tries — in­clud­ing France, South Korea, the United King­dom and the United States — have signed onto a sep­ar­ate gift bas­ket re­gard­ing trans­port se­cur­ity for nuc­le­ar and ra­di­olo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als. The five coun­tries, which ori­gin­ally en­dorsed the gift bas­ket at the 2012 Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit in South Korea, agreed to form a work­ing group that would hold meet­ings aimed at im­prov­ing the se­cur­ity of nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als in trans­port.

The five coun­tries will also “con­sider” tak­ing oth­er ac­tions re­lated to trans­port se­cur­ity, ac­cord­ing to the joint state­ment they re­leased this week. These in­clude ad­opt­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions of the yet-to-be pub­lished IAEA “Im­ple­ment­ing Guide on the Se­cur­ity of Nuc­le­ar Ma­ter­i­al in Trans­port.” The na­tions will also “con­sider mu­tu­ally ex­chan­ging in­form­a­tion on phys­ic­al pro­tec­tion and the se­cur­ity of oth­er ra­dio­act­ive ma­ter­i­als while in all modes of do­mest­ic in­ter­na­tion­al trans­port, in or­der to cap­ture good prac­tices and les­sons learned.”

The five coun­tries par­ti­cip­ated in a table-top ex­er­cise in Tokyo in Novem­ber 2013 aimed at help­ing ad­vance the same ob­ject­ives, the joint state­ment says.

“Fur­ther­more, we held two work­ing group meet­ings to ad­dress the trans­port se­cur­ity is­sues amongst the rep­res­ent­at­ives of the gov­ern­ments,” the joint state­ment con­tin­ues. “As a res­ult of the meet­ings, we de­cided to con­tin­ue the work­ing group activ­it­ies un­til the next Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit in 2016 and ex­press our fur­ther com­mit­ment to work to­geth­er for im­prov­ing se­cur­ity in the trans­port of nuc­le­ar and oth­er ra­dio­act­ive ma­ter­i­als.”

Ac­cord­ing to the joint state­ment, “Much know­ledge and ex­per­i­ences [have] been gained from past trans­ports con­duc­ted throughout the world over the last dec­ades. His­tor­ic­ally the se­cur­ity re­cord of ci­vil­ian trans­port of nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als has been ex­cel­lent and we must strive to main­tain that re­cord.”

Bunn, however, cri­ti­cized the trans­port­a­tion gift bas­ket, which does not re­quire the par­ti­cip­at­ing coun­tries to util­ize any spe­cif­ic se­cur­ity meas­ures. He told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire that the trans­port-se­cur­ity pledge “is as weak as dish­wa­ter,” and he took ex­cep­tion to its sug­ges­tion that “the se­cur­ity re­cord of ci­vil­ian trans­port of nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als has been ex­cel­lent” his­tor­ic­ally.

“Es­sen­tially what it means is just that the ship­ments have not been seized by ter­ror­ists so far,” Bunn said. “It used to be leg­al to send plutoni­um by reg­u­lar mail, and the in­dustry com­plained loudly when the [U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion] star­ted re­quir­ing any armed guards at all.”

A 1974 re­port by the then-Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ing Of­fice in­cluded pho­to­graphs of bomb-grade highly en­riched urani­um sit­ting un­guarded on a dolly in an air­port, Bunn noted. More re­cently, a truck con­tain­ing ra­dio­act­ive co­balt-60 was stolen in Mex­ico, but ul­ti­mately was re­covered.

In light of the Decem­ber in­cid­ent in Mex­ico, non­pro­lif­er­a­tion ex­perts have cri­ti­cized the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan to cut fund­ing for nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity pro­grams in fisc­al 2015.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×