Twenty-three nations participating in the Nuclear Security Summit in the Netherlands this week said they intend to comply with international guidelines regarding the security of so-called “dirty bomb” material.
The parties to the multilateral statement — including the United States and countries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East — pledged to secure all their most dangerous “Category I” radiological sources under guidelines set out by the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency. Specifically, they vowed to follow the IAEA “Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources.”
Radiological sources are those that, if paired with conventional explosives, could form a “dirty bomb” that disperses radioactive contamination over an area, but which cannot produce a nuclear detonation akin to an atomic bomb.
This week’s “gift basket” — a term applied multinational pledges not signed by all 53 nations participating in the summit — had been expected as part of a broader effort to inch the summit process toward the establishment of global standards for nuclear security. However, this one went further than some issue experts had anticipated.
In a Tuesday blog post, Matthew Bunn of Harvard University noted that the participating countries had previously committed to implementing the IAEA guidelines.
Still, the summit pledge “goes further, calling for measures such as checking the trustworthiness of people with access to radiological sources, providing a rapid response to any attempt to gain access to them (and carrying out regular exercises of that response capability), and developing a national-level response plan based on an in-depth assessment of the threat,” Bunn wrote.
The gift basket also identifies “best practices” that participating nations “may consider,” such as requiring “multiple factors” to be confirmed before a person is permitted to access sensitive materials, along with the installation of monitoring systems with “redundant and timely alarms “¦ sent to a centralized monitoring facility.”
Bunn called these practices “more venturesome” than other initiatives to which nations had previously committed. The former nuclear security adviser to President Clinton criticized the pledge for not including language regarding the transport of radiological sources, though.
Led by Japan, five countries — including France, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States — have signed onto a separate gift basket regarding transport security for nuclear and radiological materials. The five countries, which originally endorsed the gift basket at the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit in South Korea, agreed to form a working group that would hold meetings aimed at improving the security of nuclear materials in transport.
The five countries will also “consider” taking other actions related to transport security, according to the joint statement they released this week. These include adopting the recommendations of the yet-to-be published IAEA “Implementing Guide on the Security of Nuclear Material in Transport.” The nations will also “consider mutually exchanging information on physical protection and the security of other radioactive materials while in all modes of domestic international transport, in order to capture good practices and lessons learned.”
The five countries participated in a table-top exercise in Tokyo in November 2013 aimed at helping advance the same objectives, the joint statement says.
“Furthermore, we held two working group meetings to address the transport security issues amongst the representatives of the governments,” the joint statement continues. “As a result of the meetings, we decided to continue the working group activities until the next Nuclear Security Summit in 2016 and express our further commitment to work together for improving security in the transport of nuclear and other radioactive materials.”
According to the joint statement, “Much knowledge and experiences [have] been gained from past transports conducted throughout the world over the last decades. Historically the security record of civilian transport of nuclear materials has been excellent and we must strive to maintain that record.”
Bunn, however, criticized the transportation gift basket, which does not require the participating countries to utilize any specific security measures. He told Global Security Newswire that the transport-security pledge “is as weak as dishwater,” and he took exception to its suggestion that “the security record of civilian transport of nuclear materials has been excellent” historically.
“Essentially what it means is just that the shipments have not been seized by terrorists so far,” Bunn said. “It used to be legal to send plutonium by regular mail, and the industry complained loudly when the [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission] started requiring any armed guards at all.”
A 1974 report by the then-Government Accounting Office included photographs of bomb-grade highly enriched uranium sitting unguarded on a dolly in an airport, Bunn noted. More recently, a truck containing radioactive cobalt-60 was stolen in Mexico, but ultimately was recovered.
In light of the December incident in Mexico, nonproliferation experts have criticized the Obama administration’s plan to cut funding for nuclear-security programs in fiscal 2015.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."