Could the U.S. Face a Cruise Missile Threat from the Gulf of Mexico?

None

Russian President Vladimir Putin poses inside a cruise missile-equipped Tu-160 strategic bomber in 2005. The United States is working "very hard" to bolster its defenses against potential cruise-missile threats from the Gulf of Mexico, a senior military official said last week.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
March 21, 2014, 9:39 a.m.

The United States is puzz­ling over how to block cruise mis­siles that the­or­et­ic­ally could be launched from the Gulf of Mex­ico, even after throw­ing some of its most ad­vanced tech­no­lo­gies at the prob­lem.

Rus­sia and Ir­an have been cited as pos­sible threats that might, at some point, lurk in the wa­ters just off U.S. shores.

A 2013 mil­it­ary ex­er­cise pit­ted sys­tems such as Pat­ri­ot in­ter­cept­ors, Ae­gis war­ships and com­bat air­craft against po­ten­tial cruise-mis­sile or short-range bal­list­ic mis­siles fired from the Gulf. But the drill high­lighted a par­tic­u­lar vul­ner­ab­il­ity to cruise mis­siles lobbed from that re­gion, U.S. North­ern Com­mand head Gen. Charles Jac­oby in­dic­ated in con­gres­sion­al testi­mony last week.

He said the Pentagon has “some sig­ni­fic­ant chal­lenges” in coun­ter­ing these mis­siles, but is ex­plor­ing “some op­por­tun­it­ies to use ex­ist­ing sys­tems more ef­fect­ively to do that.” Many de­tailed res­ults of the Oct. 11 drill con­duc­ted near Key West, Fla., re­main clas­si­fied, Jac­oby said.

“The cruise-mis­sile threat por­tion of that we are work­ing on very hard,” the gen­er­al ad­ded at the March 13 Sen­ate Armed Ser­vice Com­mit­tee hear­ing, in re­sponse to a ques­tion from Sen­at­or Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

The mil­it­ary lead­er — whose com­mand fo­cuses on de­fense of the U.S. home­land — ref­er­enced an ini­ti­at­ive to quickly mo­bil­ize as­sets against such threats in a con­fig­ur­a­tion called the Joint De­ploy­able In­teg­rated Air and Mis­sile De­fense sys­tem.

The ef­fort is housed with­in the Pentagon’s Joint Test and Eval­u­ation pro­gram, which aims to ad­dress “op­er­a­tion­al de­fi­cien­cies” in mil­it­ary pre­pared­ness, ac­cord­ing to in­form­a­tion re­leased by the Pentagon.

“The idea is to cobble to­geth­er enough stuff [so] that maybe something will work. But none of these sys­tems were de­signed for cruise-mis­sile de­fense,” King­ston Re­if, an ana­lyst with the Cen­ter for Arms Con­trol and Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, said in an e-mail.

Cruise mis­siles can be par­tic­u­larly chal­len­ging to de­fend against, as they can be more dif­fi­cult than air­craft to de­tect on radar and are some­times tricky to shoot down, ac­cord­ing to mil­it­ary ex­perts.

A 2013 U.S. mil­it­ary in­tel­li­gence re­port fore­cas­ted that cruise mis­siles would spread in­to more hands over the com­ing dec­ade. The doc­u­ment also hints at the abil­ity to evade de­fenses de­signed against bal­list­ic mis­siles.

“Cruise mis­siles can fly at low alti­tudes to stay be­low en­emy radar and, in some cases, hide be­hind ter­rain fea­tures. New­er mis­siles are in­cor­por­at­ing stealth fea­tures to make them even less vis­ible to radars and in­frared de­tect­ors,” says the 2013 as­sess­ment by the Na­tion­al Air and Space In­tel­li­gence Cen­ter.

Cruz’s of­fice did not re­spond to re­quests to dis­cuss his spe­cif­ic con­cerns about po­ten­tial at­tack risks fa­cing the United States from the Gulf of Mex­ico. His com­ments came, though, in the wake of some oth­er pub­lic dis­cus­sion of pos­sible threats of this kind.

Ir­an last month an­nounced it in­ten­ded to de­ploy war­ships near the U.S. mari­time bor­der, prompt­ing heightened dis­cus­sion of the Middle East­ern na­tion’s grow­ing mil­it­ary cap­ab­il­it­ies.

At last week’s hear­ing, Jac­oby also spoke to Mo­scow’s cruise-mis­sile cap­ab­il­it­ies.

Re­spond­ing to a ques­tion from Sen­at­or Jeff Ses­sions (R-Ala.), the North­ern Com­mand lead­er said the United States has been “track­ing for a num­ber of years Rus­sia’s con­tin­ued in­vest­ment in im­proved cruise mis­sile tech­no­logy.”

The Krem­lin has armed its bomber air­craft with cruise mis­siles for dec­ades, he noted.

“They also are cap­able of in­tro­du­cing cruise mis­siles in­to a theat­er from sub­mar­ines,” said Jac­oby, without elab­or­at­ing on the spe­cif­ic re­gions to which these ves­sels could de­ploy. “They’ve just be­gun pro­duc­tion of a new class of quiet nuc­le­ar sub­mar­ines spe­cific­ally de­signed to de­liv­er cruise mis­siles.”

One 2012 news art­icle quotes U.S. gov­ern­ment in­siders as­sert­ing that a Rus­si­an sub­mar­ine equipped with cruise mis­siles had evaded de­tec­tion for weeks in the Gulf of Mex­ico. However, the De­fense De­part­ment denied the con­ten­tions de­scribed in the Wash­ing­ton Free Beacon re­port.

The fisc­al 2014 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, en­acted in Decem­ber, man­dates a U.S. de­fense fo­cus on “bal­list­ic mis­siles that could be launched from ves­sels on the seas around the United States, in­clud­ing the Gulf of Mex­ico.”

Jac­oby said the in­creased fo­cus on cruise-mis­sile de­fense took shape well over a year ago, at the dir­ec­tion of then-De­fense Sec­ret­ary Le­on Pan­etta.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
23 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×