Syrian authorities on Thursday gave up a third batch of warfare chemicals in under a week, apparently accelerating moves toward relinquishing their stockpile.
The latest delivery boosted the quantity of substances surrendered by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime to almost half of its declared chemical arsenal, according to the Organization of the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Danish and Norwegian transport ships are removing the materials from the war-stricken country in a disarmament effort launched after a large-scale sarin gas attack just outside of Damascus in August.
“When all of the Syrian chemicals from all storage sites have been loaded aboard the Danish and Norwegian cargo ships, they will be transported to various locations for destruction under the verification of OPCW inspectors,” the international watchdog agency said in a statement. The organization added that its personnel in Syria are supporting preparations to eliminate several chemical-arms manufacturing sites.
Thursday’s chemical-arms shipment followed a Wednesday OPCW announcement that two prior deliveries — one on Friday and another on Monday — had left Syria through the country’s Latakia seaport. Taken together, the transfers appeared to reflect an increase in the pace of removal as predicted late last month by Sigrid Kaag, the special coordinator of a U.N.-OPCW mission overseeing the disarmament process.
Damascus initially was scheduled to finish sending its weapons agents overseas by early February, laying the groundwork for full destruction of the substances by the end of June. However, international planners extended the removal timeline into April after the regime missed prior targets.
Assad’s government blamed delays on opposition threats to the materials during transport to the Latakia pickup point. However, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon determined that Damascus was equipped to move faster, and the U.N. Security Council last month formally urged the regime to boost the effort’s speed. The delays reportedly also prompted Washington to revisit options to act against the government in Syria’s civil war, which is now entering its fourth year.
The latest shipment — the regime’s eleventh since January — means that Assad has surrendered 49.3 percent of his chemical-warfare materials to date, according to OPCW figures. That amount includes 34.8 percent of the “Priority 1” substances deemed to be his deadliest chemical assets, as well as 82.6 percent of his lower-grade stocks.
In a related development, Germany on Wednesday said it is investigating whether companies within its borders illegally equipped Syria in the 1980s and 1990s with materials capable of supporting chemical-arms production, Reuters reported. German businesses might have supplied Syria with mechanical equipment, control systems and sulfuric acid suitable for manufacturing sarin nerve agent, according to a Wednesday news report by Sueddeutsche Zeitung.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."