Sri Lankan Army Rebuffs Claim of Chemical-Arms Use

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
March 18, 2014, 9:20 a.m.

Sri Lanka’s army dis­missed a me­dia claim that it em­ployed chem­ic­al arms against op­pon­ents in the na­tion’s 26-year civil war, the Xin­hua News Agency re­ports.

The mil­it­ary ser­vice is­sued the deni­al on Monday, in re­sponse to an In­di­an tele­vi­sion broad­caster’s re­cent as­ser­tion that Sri Lanka’s gov­ern­ment con­duc­ted chem­ic­al strikes against the coun­try’s Tamil Ti­ger rebels close to their de­feat in 2009. Each side re­jec­ted ac­cus­a­tions of its own chem­ic­al-arms use over the course of the con­flict.

Sri Lankan army spokes­man Ruwan Wanigas­oor­iya sug­ges­ted that the new charge was timed to co­in­cide with a gath­er­ing of the U.N. Hu­man Rights Coun­cil in Geneva, where the army is fa­cing claims of war­time ab­uses.

In re­marks to Xin­hua, the of­ficer said that while the gov­ern­ment re­frained from us­ing un­con­ven­tion­al arms, its op­pos­i­tion ap­peared to have pur­sued chem­ic­al war­fare as a pos­sible tac­tic.

“Large stocks of chem­ic­als were even re­covered from their bases dur­ing search op­er­a­tions,” Wanigas­oor­iya told the Chinese state-run news agency.

“The latest [tele­vi­sion broad­cast] is an­oth­er at­tempt by some parties to sen­sa­tion­al­ize base­less al­leg­a­tion against the [Sri Lankan] army in par­tic­u­lar and the gov­ern­ment in gen­er­al. We re­ject such ap­palling at­tempts driv­en by ves­ted in­terests,” the of­fi­cial said.

He ad­ded that the Sri Lankan gov­ern­ment “did not man­u­fac­ture weapons or mu­ni­tions” dur­ing the con­flict.

“We pro­cured our in­vent­or­ies from known sup­pli­ers through gov­ern­ment-to-gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tions,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
IN ADDITION TO DNC AND DCCC
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
AFFECTS NOVEMBER ELECTIONS
North Carolina Voter ID Law Struck Down
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday overturned North Carolina's 2013 voter ID law, saying it was passed with “discriminatory intent." The decision sends the case back to the district judge who initially dismissed challenges to the law. "The ruling prohibits North Carolina from requiring photo identification from voters in future elections, including the November 2016 general election, restores a week of early voting and preregistration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and ensures that same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting will remain in effect."

Source:
NORTH DAKOTA TO ILLINOIS
Massive Oil Pipeline Approved for the Midwest
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

An oil pipeline almost as long as the much-debated Keystone XL has won final approval to transport crude from North Dakota to Illinois, traveling through South Dakota and Iowa along the way. "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers gave the final blessing to the Dakota Access pipeline on Tuesday. Developers now have the last set of permits they need to build through the small portion of federal land the line crosses, which includes major waterways like the Mississippi and the Missouri rivers. The so-called Bakken pipeline goes through mostly state and private land."

Source:
DISAPPOINTING RESULTS
GDP Grew at 1.2% in Q2
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The U.S. economy grew at an anemic 1.2% in the second quarter, "well below the 2.6% growth economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had forecast." Consumer spending was "robust," but it was offset by "cautious" business investment. "Since the recession ended seven years ago, the expansion has failed to achieve the breakout growth seen in past recoveries. "The average annual growth rate during the current business cycle, 2.1%, remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949."

Source:
×