Back From Ukraine, Senators Brace for ‘New Cold War’

Maybe even with each other, as they figure out a way to help beat back Russia.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. (left) and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
March 17, 2014, 1:04 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors who vis­ited Ukraine cast off their polit­ic­al dif­fer­ences to de­mand in­tense dip­lo­mat­ic and eco­nom­ic pres­sure to pre­vent Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin from seiz­ing more than just Crimea. They also all agree on the need to help the very wor­ried in­ter­im lead­ers of Ukraine.

But that’s where the sim­il­ar­it­ies seem to end.

The Ukrain­i­an lead­ers be­lieve “Rus­sia’s aim wasn’t just Crimea — it’s really Kiev,” Sen. Ron John­son, a Wis­con­sin Re­pub­lic­an, said. “I think that’s really true. It’s a very un­for­tu­nate fact, but it ap­pears Vladi­mir Putin is en­gaged in a new Cold War.”

Not all John­son’s col­leagues see a Cold War re­peat, however.

“There’s a feel­ing in Ukraine that Putin is mak­ing this up as he goes along, and that sen­ti­ment is prob­ably not wrong,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn.

“The in­va­sion of Crimea was not an act of strength, but one of weak­ness,” Murphy said. ” … Rus­sia is not what they once were dur­ing the days of the Cold War. We have to take this il­leg­al ac­tion ser­i­ously, but nobody should think they are on a path to their former glory; they’re a na­tion hem­or­rhaging in re­gion­al reach and eco­nom­ic might.”

The ap­par­ent dif­fer­ences in opin­ion among the eight sen­at­ors who vis­ited Ukraine on the best way to help solve the crisis — and their di­ver­gent ana­lyses of the situ­ation on the ground — high­light the dif­fi­culty Con­gress may face as it grapples with the same task.

The Sen­ate del­eg­a­tion, led by Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., ar­rived just be­fore Crimea over­whelm­ingly voted Sunday to se­cede from Ukraine and join Rus­sia, in a ref­er­en­dum the U.S. and oth­er West­ern coun­tries de­nounced as in vi­ol­a­tion of both in­ter­na­tion­al law and Ukraine’s con­sti­tu­tion. Rus­si­an forces con­tin­ue to oc­cupy the re­gion.

All the sen­at­ors want to help, but they dis­agree on ex­actly how.

Par­tis­an bick­er­ing over ex­pand­ing the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund’s lend­ing ca­pa­city meant the eight sen­at­ors de­par­ted for Ukraine on Thursday without passing an aid pack­age. The U.S. has offered $1 bil­lion in Amer­ic­an loan guar­an­tees to the new lead­er­ship in Kiev, and a bill is ex­pec­ted to pass Con­gress soon.

The ques­tion of wheth­er to provide mil­it­ary aid could be an­oth­er di­vis­ive is­sue. The sen­at­ors re­layed Ukrain­i­an lead­ers’ warn­ings that its mil­it­ary, and likely the Ukrain­i­an people on their own, would fight back if Rus­sia tried to seize more ter­rit­ory.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has so far re­buffed a re­quest by Kiev’s in­ter­im gov­ern­ment to provide mil­it­ary aid, in­clud­ing arms and am­muni­tion. Mc­Cain, pre­dict­ably, has in­sisted Ukraine needs mil­it­ary aid. John­son agrees: “As a free­dom-seek­ing people, we should sup­port it.”

The U.S. should also send a small mil­it­ary del­eg­a­tion to as­sess what equip­ment the Ukrain­i­ans need quickly, he said.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., is also in fa­vor of send­ing small arms to Ukraine’s mil­it­ary and loc­al law en­force­ment, in con­sulta­tion with NATO al­lies. “They’re hav­ing demon­stra­tions and ri­ots in some of the cit­ies be­cause of Rus­si­ans who are be­ing bused in; we need to get them equip­ment that they need to en­force the law.”

But Murphy was skep­tic­al. “There’s noth­ing the U.S. can provide in the next few days that would provide any kind of res­ist­ance against a Rus­si­an in­va­sion. The Ukrain­i­an mil­it­ary’s cap­ab­il­it­ies don’t even al­low them to handle the most mod­ern equip­ment we could send over,” Murphy said. “I think we should re­cog­nize the lim­its of our abil­ity in the short run.”

There are a few things that mem­bers of both parties seemed to sup­port — namely, that sanc­tions is­sued by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and the European Uni­on on Monday are a good first step.

The sanc­tions against Rus­si­an and Ukrain­i­an of­fi­cials are con­sidered by far the toughest since the Cold War, but sen­at­ors said the tar­get list should be ex­pan­ded. “They’ll feel these sanc­tions, when they can’t travel the world, go to va­ca­tion homes in Cyprus or Lon­don, when they can’t in­vest,” Sen. John Ho­even said, “and have to bring all the money back in­to Rus­sia in that very lim­ited eco­nomy.”

Ul­ti­mately, Murphy ad­ded, it may be the eco­nom­ic sanc­tions against Rus­sia’s pet­ro­chem­ic­al com­pan­ies and banks that will “cause Putin enough heartache to com­pletely re­think his cal­cu­la­tion.”

Sev­er­al sen­at­ors wor­ried about how ous­ted Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Ya­nukovych “hol­lowed out” the Ukrain­i­an mil­it­ary and would sup­port help­ing Ukraine long-term. Only 6,000 troops today are ready for com­bat, Durbin said. “We need to help them pro­fes­sion­al­ize their mil­it­ary.”

Ho­even wants le­gis­la­tion to al­low the U.S. to ex­port its nat­ur­al gas to NATO coun­tries and Ukraine and de­prive Rus­sia of busi­ness. “Putin’s eco­nomy is not strong. It’s en­tirely de­pend­ent on en­ergy sales.”

The sen­at­ors were all moved by the vis­it to the cent­ral Maidan square in Kiev. It was there the protests swelled against Ya­nukovych’s gov­ern­ment, and where the gov­ern­ment used bru­tal force to try to sup­press the masses. “They were ex­ecuted right there in the pub­lic square. In­stead of people flee­ing, more people came,” Ho­even said. Now, he said, the square is “a me­mori­al to all these people who were killed in cold blood. Flowers and candles.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
0 minute ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
16 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
JOINS BUSHES, MCCAIN
Romney to Skip Convention
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

An aide to Mitt Romney confirmed to the Washington Post that the 2102 GOP nominee will not attend the Republican convention this year. He joins the two living Republican presidents, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as 2008 nominee John McCain in skipping the event. Even among living Republican nominees, that leaves only Bob Dole who could conceivably show up. Dole did say in January that he'd prefer Trump to Ted Cruz, but his age (92) could keep him from attending.

Source:
×