Dutch Unlikely To Meet Nuclear Security Summit Promise on Reactor Conversion

A general view of the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit in March 2012 in Seoul, South Korea. The Netherlands is unlikely to meet a reactor conversion deadline established there.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
March 14, 2014, 11:15 a.m.

The Neth­er­lands — host of this month’s bi­en­ni­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit in The Hag­ue — will likely be un­able to meet a com­mit­ment it made at the last such meet­ing of world lead­ers in South Korea, doc­u­ments re­leased Thursday by a watch­dog group show.

At the 2012 sum­mit, the United States, France, Bel­gi­um and the Neth­er­lands agreed to col­lab­or­ate to­wards pro­du­cing med­ic­al iso­topes without use of weapons-grade highly en­riched urani­um by 2015. Un­der the deal, Dutch pro­du­cer Mallinck­rodt was ex­pec­ted to con­vert its re­act­ors to low en­riched urani­um by that time.

However, in a Decem­ber 2013 present­a­tion to U.S. of­fi­cials, the com­pany re­ferred to the 2015 date that the four coun­tries agreed to as an “ag­gress­ive, as­pir­a­tion­al goal.” The Uni­versity of Texas-Aus­tin’s Nuc­le­ar Pro­lif­er­a­tion Pre­ven­tion Pro­ject ob­tained a copy of the present­a­tion, and made it pub­lic, along with oth­er re­lated doc­u­ments.

“Des­pite our best ef­forts for con­ver­sion, we have run in­to some tech­nic­al is­sues which have delayed the pro­ject,” read the brief­ing slides by Mallinck­rodt Stra­tegic Al­li­ances Dir­ect­or Roy Brown. “These delays will likely re­quire HEU ship­ments throughout 2015 and 2016 to as­sure pa­tient needs are met, be­fore full con­ver­sion to LEU is at­tained.”

Com­pany and Dutch gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials sub­sequently con­firmed the delay in Jan. 27 and Feb. 16 let­ters to Alan Ku­per­man, co­ordin­at­or for the Nuc­le­ar Pro­lif­er­a­tion Pre­ven­tion Pro­ject.

Ku­per­man, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Texas-Aus­tin and a former con­gres­sion­al aide, said Brown re­it­er­ated the delay again on Wed­nes­day at a White House meet­ing. Ku­per­man, who was present at the meet­ing, said com­pany of­fi­cials cited a new 2017 tar­get date for LEU con­ver­sion, but im­plied that there could even be fur­ther delays bey­ond that.

U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cials, who also par­ti­cip­ated in the Wed­nes­day meet­ing and who lead Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion ef­forts to re­duce pro­lif­er­a­tion con­cerns re­lated to med­ic­al iso­topes, could not be reached for com­ment.

Mallinck­rodt spokes­wo­man Lynn Phil­lips on Fri­day said she could not dis­cuss the com­pany’s dis­cus­sions with gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials, but con­firmed it had ex­per­i­enced delays in the con­ver­sion pro­gram. The com­pany con­tin­ues to work “di­li­gently”  to­ward con­ver­sion, but a “self-im­posed” 2015 dead­line that she said the com­pany had set a year pri­or to the 2012 sum­mit had been pushed back to 2017. She noted this new tar­get date was in ad­vance of 2020, when the United States plans to halt HEU ex­ports.

Ku­per­man, along with two oth­er U.S.-based act­iv­ists, wrote to Dutch gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials on Jan. 22 and urged them to in­ter­vene. Spe­cific­ally, they asked the Dutch gov­ern­ment, which will host the 2014 sum­mit in less than two weeks, to per­suade Mallinck­rodt to ac­cept U.S. fin­an­cial and tech­nic­al as­sist­ance in or­der to speed the con­ver­sion pro­cess. The U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment has provided fin­an­cial as­sist­ance for con­ver­sion ef­forts in Bel­gi­um and South Africa, but Ku­per­man claims the Mallinck­rodt ini­tially re­fused such aid for its op­er­a­tions in the Neth­er­lands, cit­ing con­ver­sa­tions with U.S. of­fi­cials.

“It would be a grave em­bar­rass­ment for your coun­try at the forth­com­ing sum­mit if the Neth­er­lands were not per­ceived as do­ing everything pos­sible to meet its com­mit­ment from the pre­ced­ing sum­mit,” said the let­ter, signed by Ku­per­man, Prin­ceton Uni­versity Seni­or Re­search Phys­i­cist Frank von Hip­pel and Uni­on of Con­cerned Sci­ent­ists Seni­or Sci­ent­ist Ed­win Ly­man.

Piet de Klerk, the Dutch for­eign min­istry of­fi­cial or­gan­iz­ing the sum­mit, re­spon­ded to the let­ter on Feb. 26. He said Mallinck­rodt had “re­star­ted dis­cus­sions with the U.S. De­part­ment of En­ergy about po­ten­tial fund­ing of a por­tion of the con­ver­sion costs,” but that fin­an­cial as­sist­ance was “not the prime key to suc­cess.”

Ac­cord­ing to de Klerk, over­com­ing tech­nic­al chal­lenges was the most im­port­ant factor in the delay.

“This is a time-con­sum­ing pro­cess of test­ing and re-test­ing, in which every step of the pro­cess, in the in­terest of safety and product qual­ity, has to be ap­proved by the reg­u­lat­ory au­thor­it­ies,” de Klerk wrote. “The Neth­er­lands gov­ern­ment re­mains fully com­mit­ted “¦ and is fully con­fid­ent that the in­dus­tries in­volved will reach the goals set in 2012 as ex­ped­i­tiously as pos­sible.”

Ku­per­man ar­gues, however, that Mallinck­rodt of­fi­cials ad­mit­ted that a lack of ad­equate re­sources was in­deed a factor in the delay. In a Jan. 17 let­ter to Ku­per­man, Brown wrote that Mallinck­rodt ex­per­i­enced un­ex­pec­ted re­act­or shut­downs and main­ten­ance is­sues since the 2012 sum­mit that re­quired the com­pany to “dir­ect sub­stan­tial re­sources to those ef­forts [which] slowed con­ver­sion.”

Phil­lips re­it­er­ated on Fri­day that the re­act­or shut­downs were re­spons­ible for the delays.

Bel­gi­um, Europe’s oth­er ma­jor pro­du­cer of med­ic­al iso­topes, is still ex­pec­ted to meet the 2015 con­ver­sion dead­line, Ku­per­man said. He noted that com­pan­ies in Aus­tralia, South Africa and Ar­gen­tina are already pro­du­cing med­ic­al iso­topes without highly en­riched urani­um.

Ku­per­man chas­tised the Dutch gov­ern­ment for what he said was a fail­ure to act more quickly to en­sure that Mallinck­rodt would en­able the coun­try to com­ply with the sum­mit pact.

“It is a huge em­bar­rass­ment and sets a ter­rible ex­ample when the sum­mit host vi­ol­ates its own pledge,” Ku­per­man said in a writ­ten state­ment Thursday. “‘Do as we say, not as we do’ is not an ef­fect­ive for­eign policy.”

Of­fi­cials at the Dutch em­bassy in Wash­ing­ton were un­able to com­ment by press time.

Un­der the 2012 agree­ment, the United States, which does not cur­rently pro­duce its own med­ic­al iso­topes, agreed to col­lab­or­ate with the European na­tions on their con­ver­sion ef­forts and to con­tin­ue to sup­ply them with highly en­riched urani­um un­til those con­ver­sion ef­forts are com­plete.

What We're Following See More »
FIRST WOMAN NOMINATED BY MAJOR PARTY
Hillary Clinton Accepts the Democratic Nomination for President
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."

COUNTER-CHANTS AT THE READY
Protesters Make Good on Threat to Disrupt Speech
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"

SUFFOLK POLL
New Survey Shows Clinton Up 9 in Pennsylvania
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."

Source:
$500 MILLION PROJECT
Obama Library Heading to Jackson Park in Chicago
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Barack Obama has chosen Jackson Park, a lakefront park that once hosted the world’s fair on the city’s South Side, for his $500 million presidential library, according to a person familiar with the matter."

Source:
THREE NIGHTS RUNNING
Democrats Beat Republicans in Convention Ratings So Far
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."

Source:
×