Obama Officials: U.S. Not Backing Away from Nuclear Security

Global Security Newswire Staff
March 10, 2014, 7:12 a.m.

Seni­or Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials are in­sist­ing the gov­ern­ment is not re­treat­ing from its fo­cus on nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity des­pite pro­posed fund­ing cuts.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al, an­nounced last week, would elim­in­ate in ex­cess of $220 mil­lion in fund­ing for nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion ef­forts, USA Today re­por­ted on Sat­urday.

One of the largest re­ques­ted cuts in nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion spend­ing would come from the In­ter­na­tion­al Ma­ter­i­al Pro­tec­tion and Co­oper­a­tion ini­ti­at­ive. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is seek­ing just $305.5 mil­lion for the pro­gram, com­pared to the $419.5 mil­lion ap­pro­pri­ated for the cur­rent fisc­al cycle. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is also re­quest­ing $108 mil­lion less than cur­rent ap­pro­pri­ated levels for the Glob­al Threat Re­duc­tion Ini­ti­at­ive.

En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz said the de­cline in re­ques­ted non­pro­lif­er­a­tion fund­ing is due to an ad­min­is­tra­tion de­term­in­a­tion to moth­ball a con­tro­ver­sial ef­fort to con­struct a mixed-ox­ide fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity that would con­vert ex­cess plutoni­um in­to nuc­le­ar-re­act­or fuel.

The de­cision to shelve the MOX fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina ex­plains 54 per­cent of the re­duc­tion in sought-after non­pro­lif­er­a­tion funds.

Eliza­beth Sher­wood-Ran­dall, the White House’s point per­son on weapons of mass de­struc­tion, in a re­cent talk at Har­vard Uni­versity’s Belfer Cen­ter, re­jec­ted any sug­ges­tion that the ad­min­is­tra­tion is less fo­cused on glob­al nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity.

“I don’t think there is a prob­lem with com­pla­cency,” she said. “We are seized with this chal­lenge — with pre­vent­ing sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­als from fall­ing in­to the hands of ter­ror­ists or oth­ers who could use it to do us harm.”

Still, some arms con­trol ad­voc­ates ques­tion the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s com­mit­ment to nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity.

“What I take away from this budget is that there was a lack of lead­er­ship in try­ing to main­tain the pri­or­it­iz­a­tion of the fund­ing of this is­sue,” said Part­ner­ship for Glob­al Se­cur­ity Pres­id­ent Ken­neth Luongo. “The sig­nal is we are in re­treat on this is­sue, and I think that is a huge mis­take.”

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×