A new independent report contends there is a pressing need for well informed U.K. debate over plans for modernizing that nation’s nuclear arsenal.
The Nuclear Education Trust report, released on Tuesday, raises several factors related to any decision on whether to procure four new Successor-class ballistic missile submarines, including the cost of modernizing the country’s nuclear deterrent and its potential for being involved in a catastrophic mishap or contributing to proliferation, the London Guardian reports.
“Britain’s nuclear weapons should be subject to the same cost-effectiveness test and public scrutiny that all public expenditure has to be subjected to,” states the report.
Under existing Defense Ministry plans, today’s four Vanguard-class submarines — armed with Trident nuclear-tipped missiles — are due to be retired in the 2020s. The so-called “like-for-like” plan to replace them with Successor vessels is projected to cost more than $30 billion in developmental, purchase and operating costs.
The Conservative Party — the senior partner in the U.K. governing coalition — has said Britain would not make a “final gate” decision on whether to proceed with the like-for-like plan until after the next general elections in 2015.
That has not stopped Conservatives from approving tens of millions of dollars in new submarine-related contracts. The Liberal Democrats — the junior governing party — want to see only three new ballistic-missile submarines built, which could result in about $3 billion in plan savings. There also have been signs that the opposition Labor Party could be wavering in its support for the like-for-like plan.
The Nuclear Education Trust — a nonprofit that promotes education in arms-control matters — called for including the U.K. nuclear deterrent in the country’s next Strategic Defense and Security Review. In producing its own assessment, the trust interviewed a number of onetime armed services chiefs and former defense secretaries.
A separate report by Scientists for Global Responsibility on Monday concluded the British government spends approximately $530 million annually on nuclear arms-related research and development.
What We're Following See More »
"Two Republicans intimately familiar with Bill Kristol’s efforts to recruit an independent presidential candidate to challenge Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have told Bloomberg Politics that the person Kristol has in mind is David French -- whose name the editor of the Weekly Standard floated in the current issue of the magazine.
French is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to the website of National Review, where French is a staff writer, he is a constitutional lawyer, a recipient of the Bronze Star, and an author of several books who lives in Columbia, Tenn., with his wife Nancy and three children."
California Gov. Jerry Brown endorsed Hillary Clinton today, calling her "the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump." While praising Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign, Brown said "Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee. ... This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun."
In a New York Magazine profile, Hillary Clinton said she still encounters misogyny at her own events: “‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.”
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”