Report: U.K. Plans for New Submarines Require More Debate

Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 11, 2014, 7:05 a.m.

A new in­de­pend­ent re­port con­tends there is a press­ing need for well in­formed U.K. de­bate over plans for mod­ern­iz­ing that na­tion’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

The Nuc­le­ar Edu­ca­tion Trust re­port, re­leased on Tues­day, raises sev­er­al factors re­lated to any de­cision on wheth­er to pro­cure four new Suc­cessor-class bal­list­ic mis­sile sub­mar­ines, in­clud­ing the cost of mod­ern­iz­ing the coun­try’s nuc­le­ar de­terrent and its po­ten­tial for be­ing in­volved in a cata­stroph­ic mis­hap or con­trib­ut­ing to pro­lif­er­a­tion, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­ports.

“Bri­tain’s nuc­le­ar weapons should be sub­ject to the same cost-ef­fect­ive­ness test and pub­lic scru­tiny that all pub­lic ex­pendit­ure has to be sub­jec­ted to,” states the re­port.

Un­der ex­ist­ing De­fense Min­istry plans, today’s four Van­guard-class sub­mar­ines — armed with Tri­dent nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles — are due to be re­tired in the 2020s. The so-called “like-for-like” plan to re­place them with Suc­cessor ves­sels is pro­jec­ted to cost more than $30 bil­lion in de­vel­op­ment­al, pur­chase and op­er­at­ing costs.

The Con­ser­vat­ive Party — the seni­or part­ner in the U.K. gov­ern­ing co­ali­tion — has said Bri­tain would not make a “fi­nal gate” de­cision on wheth­er to pro­ceed with the like-for-like plan un­til after the next gen­er­al elec­tions in 2015.

That has not stopped Con­ser­vat­ives from ap­prov­ing tens of mil­lions of dol­lars in new sub­mar­ine-re­lated con­tracts. The Lib­er­al Demo­crats — the ju­ni­or gov­ern­ing party — want to see only three new bal­list­ic-mis­sile sub­mar­ines built, which could res­ult in about $3 bil­lion in plan sav­ings. There also have been signs that the op­pos­i­tion Labor Party could be waver­ing in its sup­port for the like-for-like plan.

The Nuc­le­ar Edu­ca­tion Trust — a non­profit that pro­motes edu­ca­tion in arms-con­trol mat­ters — called for in­clud­ing the U.K. nuc­le­ar de­terrent in the coun­try’s next Stra­tegic De­fense and Se­cur­ity Re­view. In pro­du­cing its own as­sess­ment, the trust in­ter­viewed a num­ber of one­time armed ser­vices chiefs and former de­fense sec­ret­ar­ies.

A sep­ar­ate re­port by Sci­ent­ists for Glob­al Re­spons­ib­il­ity on Monday con­cluded the Brit­ish gov­ern­ment spends ap­prox­im­ately $530 mil­lion an­nu­ally on nuc­le­ar arms-re­lated re­search and de­vel­op­ment.

What We're Following See More »
FRENCH IS A LAWYER, VETERAN
Kristol Recruiting National Review’s David French for Third-Party Run
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Two Republicans intimately familiar with Bill Kristol’s efforts to recruit an independent presidential candidate to challenge Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have told Bloomberg Politics that the person Kristol has in mind is David French -- whose name the editor of the Weekly Standard floated in the current issue of the magazine.

French is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to the website of National Review, where French is a staff writer, he is a constitutional lawyer, a recipient of the Bronze Star, and an author of several books who lives in Columbia, Tenn., with his wife Nancy and three children."

Source:
CALIFORNIA VOTES IN A WEEK
Jerry Brown Backs Clinton
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

California Gov. Jerry Brown endorsed Hillary Clinton today, calling her "the only path forward to win the presidency and stop the dangerous candidacy of Donald Trump." While praising Sen. Bernie Sanders' campaign, Brown said "Clinton’s lead is insurmountable and Democrats have shown – by millions of votes – that they want her as their nominee. ... This is no time for Democrats to keep fighting each other. The general election has already begun."

Source:
GLASS CEILING STILL HARD TO CRACK
Clinton Says Voters Still Hung Up on Gender
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a New York Magazine profile, Hillary Clinton said she still encounters misogyny at her own events: “‘I really admire you, I really like you, I just don’t know if I can vote for a woman to be president.’ I mean, they come to my events and then they say that to me.”

Source:
CHANGE WE CAN’T BELIEVE IN
Trump Vows Not to Change
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
Source:
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

×