Signing a security agreement with Iraq likely wouldn’t have prevented the resurgence of al-Qaida and the ongoing violence in the country, a Defense official said Tuesday.
“I do think that the idea that if we had negotiated a follow-on settlement with the Iraqis, and had a SOFA [status of forces agreement] and a remaining force, the idea that that force would be able to prevent what’s going on is — I’m not sure that that would be possible,” said Elissa Slotkin, the principal deputy assistant secretary of Defense for international security affairs, adding that at the height of the U.S. troop surge there were similar levels of violence in the Anbar Province in western Iraq.
Slotkin testified as part of a House Armed Services Committee hearing on the U.S. military position in the Middle East. Republicans have criticized President Obama for shifting what they view as needed attention away from the region. The administration recently deployed Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Secretary of State John Kerry to push back against the belief that the United States is stepping away from its Middle East commitments.
Committee Chairman Buck McKeon asked what lessons could be transferred from the ongoing violence in Iraq and the lack of a security agreement to the drawdown in Afghanistan, where President Hamid Karzai is refusing to let a bilateral security agreement be signed until after the election.
But the Defense official said she wasn’t sure “a remaining force of 10,000 would have been able to prevent” the violence or that the situations are “analogous.” The Defense Department is recommending the administration keep 10,000 troops in Afghanistan after this year. It’s similar to the number of troops the Obama administration offered to leave in Iraq.
But officials stressed that the administration is focused on helping the Iraqis secure their country, through providing military equipment including the recent transfer of Hellfire missiles and helicopters.
“We have made an extraordinary effort … to give them the weaponry, and frankly the intelligence support that they need to meet this … renewed threat,” said Anne Patterson, assistant secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs, adding that the U.S. will step up its training with the Iraqis.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.