More than half of Americans believe the United States has mostly failed to achieve its goals with the war in Afghanistan, according to a poll released Thursday.
The USA Today/Pew Research Center poll is a stark contrast to one released in June 2011 following the death of Osama bin Laden. At that time, 58 percent said they believed the United States would achieve its goals in Afghanistan.
Fifty-two percent of Americans said the United States has mostly failed to achieve its goals in the country, compared with 38 percent who said the U.S. has mostly succeeded, according to Thursday’s poll.
The poll was conducted Jan. 15-19 among 1,504 adults, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.
Despite uncertainty over the United States’ reaching its goals, 51 percent of Americans said the decision to use military force was the right one, compared with 41 percent who said it wasn’t. In January 2009, 64 percent said using military force was the right call.
And there’s little partisan divide on whether the United States has achieved its goals. Fifty-two percent of Republicans said it has mostly failed, compared with 48 percent of Democrats and 54 percent of independents.
A question on whether the United States had achieved its goals in Iraq garnered nearly exact results. Fifty-two percent said the United States had mostly failed, while 37 percent believe it has mostly succeeded.
The poll comes as U.S. officials and NATO allies are uncertain what — if any — military involvement they will have in Afghanistan after this year. U.S.-Afghan relations have been trained over President Hamid Karzai’s refusal to sign a bilateral security agreement until after the country’s elections later this year. U.S. officials have argued that delaying the signing hurts military planning and increases the chance that the United States will remove all of its troops by the end of the 2014.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."