Poll: Americans Growing More Negative About Success in Afghanistan

But more than half still support the decision to use military force.

U.S. Marines walk on top of their Light Armored Vehicles (LAVs) while on patrol near the American military compound at Kandahar Airport January 16, 2002 in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Jan. 31, 2014, 3:05 a.m.

More than half of Amer­ic­ans be­lieve the United States has mostly failed to achieve its goals with the war in Afgh­anistan, ac­cord­ing to a poll re­leased Thursday.

The USA Today/Pew Re­search Cen­ter poll is a stark con­trast to one re­leased in June 2011 fol­low­ing the death of Osama bin Laden. At that time, 58 per­cent said they be­lieved the United States would achieve its goals in Afgh­anistan.

Fifty-two per­cent of Amer­ic­ans said the United States has mostly failed to achieve its goals in the coun­try, com­pared with 38 per­cent who said the U.S. has mostly suc­ceeded, ac­cord­ing to Thursday’s poll.

The poll was con­duc­ted Jan. 15-19 among 1,504 adults, with a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 2.9 per­cent­age points.

Des­pite un­cer­tainty over the United States’ reach­ing its goals, 51 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans said the de­cision to use mil­it­ary force was the right one, com­pared with 41 per­cent who said it wasn’t. In Janu­ary 2009, 64 per­cent said us­ing mil­it­ary force was the right call.

And there’s little par­tis­an di­vide on wheth­er the United States has achieved its goals. Fifty-two per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans said it has mostly failed, com­pared with 48 per­cent of Demo­crats and 54 per­cent of in­de­pend­ents.

A ques­tion on wheth­er the United States had achieved its goals in Ir­aq garnered nearly ex­act res­ults. Fifty-two per­cent said the United States had mostly failed, while 37 per­cent be­lieve it has mostly suc­ceeded.

The poll comes as U.S. of­fi­cials and NATO al­lies are un­cer­tain what — if any — mil­it­ary in­volve­ment they will have in Afgh­anistan after this year. U.S.-Afghan re­la­tions have been trained over Pres­id­ent Ham­id Kar­zai’s re­fus­al to sign a bi­lat­er­al se­cur­ity agree­ment un­til after the coun­try’s elec­tions later this year. U.S. of­fi­cials have ar­gued that delay­ing the sign­ing hurts mil­it­ary plan­ning and in­creases the chance that the United States will re­move all of its troops by the end of the 2014.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×