Pentagon Test Czar Sees Possible Need for Interceptor Component Redesign

None

A U.S. Ground Based Interceptor, equipped with an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, takes off from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., in a January 2013 flight test of the long-range missile defense technology. The Pentagon's testing czar in a Wednesday report said multiple test failures of the kill vehicle suggest a redesign may be needed.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
Jan. 29, 2014, 9:25 a.m.

The Pentagon’s test­ing czar on Wed­nes­day said a crit­ic­al piece of the U.S. mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem may re­quire a re­design fol­low­ing mul­tiple test fail­ures.

The De­fense De­part­ment’s op­er­a­tion­al test and eval­u­ation of­fice con­cluded in its fisc­al 2013 an­nu­al re­port that re­peated mis­fires of the Ground-Based Mid­course De­fense, or “GMD,” sys­tem’s Exoat­mo­spher­ic Kill Vehicle “raise ques­tions re­gard­ing the ro­bust­ness of the EKV’s design.”

The three most re­cent at­tempts at in­ter­cept­ing a dummy bal­list­ic mis­sile us­ing the Ray­theon-de­veloped EKV com­pon­ent have all been un­suc­cess­ful. The last suc­cess­ful test in­ter­cept was in 2008.

The Exoat­mo­spher­ic Kill Vehicle is the front-end com­pon­ent of the mis­sile-de­fense ar­chi­tec­ture’s Ground Based In­ter­cept­or and uses kin­et­ic force, rather than a det­on­at­ing war­head, to des­troy in­com­ing mis­siles. There are two ver­sions of the EKV com­pon­ent — the CE-1 kill vehicle and a later-gen­er­a­tion CE-2 mod­el.

A suc­cess­ful non-in­ter­cept flight tri­al last Janu­ary of a mod­i­fied ver­sion of  the CE-2 vehicle made the Pentagon’s Mis­sile De­fense Agency hope­ful the tech­no­logy prob­lems that caused the suc­cess­ive test-in­ter­cept fail­ures in 2010  had been fixed. However, an un­suc­cess­ful Ju­ly in­ter­cept at­tempt raised new prob­lems with the Ground Based In­ter­cept­or when the CE-1 kill vehicle failed to sep­ar­ate from the mis­sile’s third-stage rock­et boost­er.

North Korea’s pro­gress in de­vel­op­ing long-range mis­siles — and, to a less­er de­gree, Ir­an’s such pro­gress — have made im­prov­ing U.S. home­land mis­sile de­fenses a ma­jor na­tion­al se­cur­ity fo­cus for the Re­pub­lic­an Party, which is push­ing for the cre­ation of a third in­ter­cept­or site some­where on the East Coast. Cur­rently there are two in­ter­cept­or sites — one in Cali­for­nia and an­oth­er in Alaska — that field a total of 30 Ground Based In­ter­cept­or mis­siles. The Pentagon is plan­ning on de­ploy­ing an ad­di­tion­al 14 in­ter­cept­ors in 2017 in Alaska, as a re­sponse to North Korea’s nuc­le­ar and mis­sile pro­gress.

Mi­chael Gilmore, the Pentagon test­ing dir­ect­or, in his fisc­al 2013 re­port ad­vised the de­part­ment to “con­sider wheth­er to re­design the EKV us­ing a rig­or­ous sys­tems en­gin­eer­ing pro­cess to as­sure its design is ro­bust against fail­ure.”

MDA spokes­man Richard Lehner in a Wed­nes­day email said he had no in­form­a­tion to share about wheth­er the Exoat­mo­spher­ic Kill Vehicle would be re­tooled.

“After the Decem­ber 2010 GMD flight test fail­ure, the Mis­sile De­fense Agency made cor­rec­tions to the EKV to ad­dress the fail­ure mech­an­ism seen in the in­ter­cept test fail­ure,” Lehner wrote. “The EKV’s per­form­ance was proven in the Janu­ary 2013 non-in­ter­cept flight test in which the in­ter­cept­or com­pleted a stress­ing flight pro­file without ex­per­i­en­cing the is­sues seen in the 2010 test fail­ure.”

However, the test czar’s re­port con­cluded that “the per­form­ance of GMD dur­ing flight tests in [fisc­al 2013] pre­ven­ted any im­prove­ment in the as­sess­ment of GMD cap­ab­il­ity.”

The Pentagon test­ing and eval­u­ation of­fice in its fisc­al 2012 re­port con­cluded that prob­lems with the EKV tech­no­logy were pre­vent­ing the United States from mov­ing bey­ond any­thing but a lim­ited cap­ab­il­ity to des­troy a few in­com­ing bal­list­ic mis­siles. All in­ter­cept tri­als to date have in­volved only one tar­get, where­as an ac­tu­al bal­list­ic-mis­sile at­tack on the United States might well in­volve more than one in­com­ing mis­sile.

“It has taken [the De­fense test dir­ect­or] a long time to reach the con­clu­sion that the GMD kill vehicles may be too flawed to save,” King­ston Re­if of the Cen­ter for Arms Con­trol and Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion said in an email. “It is not clear wheth­er Mis­sile De­fense Agency Dir­ect­or [Vice] Adm. [James] Syr­ing — or more im­port­antly Sec­ret­ary of De­fense [Chuck] Hagel — share this con­clu­sion.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×