If all U.S. forces leave Afghanistan at year’s end, plans for responding to any nuclear crisis in Pakistan or India could be jeopardized, the New York Times reports.
Efforts to finalize with Afghan President Hamid Karzai an agreement that would allow U.S. troops to remain in the country past the end of 2014 have been rocky. If compromise cannot be reached and the Obama administration chooses to withdraw all forces, the CIA drone bases built in Afghanistan might have to shut down because they would be unprotected, unidentified U.S. officials told the Times.
The facilities permit the United States to fly remotely piloted aircraft into nearby Pakistan for missions against al-Qaida or to monitor potential threats to that nation’s expanding nuclear arsenal.
The Obama administration is sufficiently worried that a final accord with Karzai might not be reached that it has convened a task force of policy, armed forces and intelligence experts to brainstorm options for closing the security gap that could be created if the drone bases have to close, according to the Times report.
Drones launched from other U.S. bases would take longer to reach South Asia, which would complicate monitoring efforts and any mission to respond to a potential nuclear crisis in Pakistan or India.
Pakistan-based extremist groups over the years have staged a number of moderately successful strikes against military bases in the country and are a serious nuclear security concern to the United States. Last year documents leaked by former government contractor Edward Snowden revealed that monitoring Pakistan’s nuclear, biological and chemical facilities consumes a significant part of the U.S. intelligence community’s attention.
A 2009 incident that led Washington to worry that some Pakistani atomic substances had gone missing prompted President Obama to direct that a long-term surveillance and search capability be created for the region, the Times reported.
What We're Following See More »
According to a new CNN/ORC poll, Donald Trump emerged from the GOP convention "ahead of Hillary Clinton in the race for the White House, topping her 44% to 39% in a four-way matchup including Gary Johnson (9%) and Jill Stein (3%) and by three points in a two-way head-to-head, 48% to 45%. That latter finding represents a 6-point convention bounce for Trump, which are traditionally measured in two-way matchups."
As the Democratic National Convention gets underway today in Philadelphia, some prominent Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate are nowhere to be found. "At least four candidates in major races are opting out, including Russ Feingold, who is challengingSen. Ron Johnson in Wisconsin; Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, who is taking on Sen. John McCain in Arizona; Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, who is running against Sen. Roy Blunt; and Catherine Cortez Masto, who is battling Rep. Joe Heck in Nevada for the seat vacated by retiring Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid." The candidates have stated their decisions aren't motivated by a desire to avoid being tied to the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
Michael Bloomberg will endorse Hillary Clinton this week in a prime-time speech. "The news is an unexpected move from Mr. Bloomberg, who has not been a member of the Democratic Party since 2000; was elected the mayor of New York City as a Republican; and later became an independent. But it reflects Mr. Bloomberg’s increasing dismay about the rise of Donald J. Trump and a determination to see that the Republican nominee is defeated."
"The Democratic Rules Committee voted overwhelmingly in favor of a major shift in the superdelegate system Saturday night after a deal was reached between" the Clinton and Sanders camps. "The committee approved nearly unanimously an amendment that preserves the existing superdelegate role for elected U.S. lawmakers and governors, but will bind the remaining superdelegates — roughly two-thirds — to primary and caucus results."