The Iranian government agreed to curb its uranium enrichment under the interim agreement that went into effect Monday, but that’s a just small beginning to larger steps it would likely need to take as part of a long-term deal.
That’s the assessment in the report from the Institute for Science and International Security released Monday. The ISIS based its conclusions on talks with senior U.S. officials.
According to the report, the Iranian government would likely have to make a number of modifications including:
Shifting the under-construction, heavy-water reactor in Arak to a light-water reactor. The reactor — which has been a source of tension between the Iranian government and Western officials — would enrich below 5 percent for isotope uranium 235. Uranium 235, if enriched enough, can be used in a weapon.
Not stockpiling enriched uranium beyond what is needed for a peaceful civilian program.
For at least 20 years, limiting its enrichment to one nuclear site and shutting down its current site at Fordow, or converting it to a “non-centrifuge-related site.” Centrifuges are a key part of the uranium-enrichment process.
Centrifuges will be limited; and excess centrifuges will be removed from nuclear sites at Natanz and Fordow. The International Atomic Energy Agency will be responsible for monitoring the centrifuges.
For at least 20 years, caps should be placed on the amount of 20 percent low-enriched uranium oxide that Iran possesses. The material can easily be converted to hexafluoride, needed to create fuel for an atomic bomb.
Some of the provisions are measured on a 20-year timeline because, according to the report, that is the minimum amount of time the international community needs to feel confident in treating Iran like other non-nuclear countries that follow the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector who leads ISIS, told The Wall Street Journal — which was given exclusive access to the report — “Our requirements are a far cry from what Iran wants. The negotiations are going to be really tough. We don’t see ourselves as sketching an extreme case, however.”
The report comes as the IAEA announced Iran has agreed to an inspection schedule of its nuclear facilities, slowed construction on the Arak heavy-water reactor, and begun using centrifuges previously used to enrich uranium to 20 percent for 5-percent enriched uranium.
Officials have said talks at reaching a long-term deal on Iran’s nuclear program could start next month.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”