Australia Withholds Location of New Biodefense Lab

Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 17, 2014, 8:04 a.m.

Aus­tralia is re­fus­ing to dis­close the sit­ing of a new urb­an biode­fense labor­at­ory over fears of a tar­geted strike, the Ad­elaide Ad­vert­iser re­ports.

The “Phys­ic­al Con­tain­ment Level 3” com­plex, in op­er­a­tion as of this week, is the highest-se­cur­ity dis­ease re­search fa­cil­ity in the state of South Aus­tralia, ac­cord­ing to the news­pa­per.

The site is ex­pec­ted to con­duct as­sess­ments tied to “risk group 3” patho­gens, said Janice Fletch­er, the state’s act­ing patho­logy dir­ect­or. That in­cludes bio­lo­gic­al threats such as tuber­cu­los­is and Q fever.

“The lab will pro­cess around 9,000 TB samples per year,” Fletch­er said. “[It] also has the cap­ab­il­ity to test for some oth­er or­gan­isms, in­clud­ing a bi­o­ter­ror­ism test­ing cap­ab­il­ity.”

A re­cently en­acted state health law helped es­tab­lish the ra­tionale for the new My­co­bac­teri­um Ref­er­ence Labor­at­ory, which is in­ten­ded to sup­port re­sponses to the most ser­i­ous dis­ease events the re­gion may face.

State med­ic­al of­fi­cials “re­cog­nized that we did not have a suit­ably rated con­tain­ment labor­at­ory for deal­ing with high-risk mi­croor­gan­isms,” South Aus­tralia Health Min­is­ter Jack Snelling said. He said the new labor­at­ory can “op­er­ate at — or above — the level of lead­ing labor­at­or­ies in oth­er states.”

In the past, au­thor­it­ies have had to send po­ten­tial bio­lo­gic­al-threat ma­ter­i­als to oth­er Aus­trali­an states for as­sess­ment, Snelling ad­ded.

“We have to be pre­pared to re­spond quickly to test and find solu­tions to any­thing from nat­ur­ally oc­cur­ring su­per­bugs to the event of a bioat­tack,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×