The Navy Fraud Scandal That Just Won’t Go Away

The DOJ is continuing an investigation which has already ensnared more than a handful of Navy officials.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 22: U.S. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus leaves the podium after he spoke during a memorial service for victims of the Washington Navy Yard shooting at the Marine Barracks September 22, 2013 in Washington, DC. The president and the first lady visited with families of the victims in the deadly shooting at the Washington Navy Yard. Thirteen people, including the gunman Aaron Alexis, were killed in the incident. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Dec. 29, 2013, 11:49 p.m.

A Navy fraud in­vest­ig­a­tion is be­com­ing one the largest scan­dals for the armed ser­vice in re­cent years, and the in­vest­ig­a­tion is spill­ing over in­to 2014.

Le­onard Glenn Fran­cis, the CEO for Singa­pore-based Glenn De­fense Mar­ine Asia, was ar­res­ted in Septem­ber for al­legedly brib­ing of­fi­cials with cash, trips, and oth­er items in ex­change for ship in­form­a­tion.

So far, six Navy of­fi­cials have been tied to the in­cid­ent with two ar­res­ted.

“I cer­tainly don’t think we’ve seen the end of it,” Navy Sec­ret­ary Ray Mabus said earli­er this month, dis­cuss­ing the case pub­licly for the first time dur­ing a press con­fer­ence. “I think it’s fair to say that there will be more dis­clos­ures com­ing in.”

The sec­ret­ary de­clined to say if he be­lieves those dis­clos­ures will res­ult in the ar­rest of more Navy of­fi­cials.

The in­vest­ig­a­tion — and res­ult­ing me­dia fo­cus — has put how the Navy handles its con­tract­ing un­will­ingly un­der the spot­light, but Mabus said he would “rather get bad head­lines than let bad people get away.”

John Ber­trand Be­liveau Jr., a su­per­vis­ory spe­cial agent with the Nav­al Crim­in­al In­vest­ig­at­ive Ser­vice, also plead guilty earli­er this month to par­ti­cip­at­ing in the al­leged fraud.

And the Justice De­part­ment noted in a press re­lease that the in­vest­ig­a­tion is still on­go­ing to de­term­ine the full scope of the al­leged at­tempt to de­fraud the Navy. Mabus couldn’t com­ment on the amount of money that has been de­frauded. But in court doc­u­ments, U.S. at­tor­neys char­ac­ter­ize it as a “multi-na­tion­al, multi-year, multi-mil­lion dol­lar fraud on the United States Navy.”

Mabus touted the Navy’s hand in launch­ing the in­vest­ig­a­tion. Though that star­ted in 2010, GDMA con­tin­ued to hold nav­al con­tracts well in­to this year. Mabus ex­plained that sus­pend­ing a con­tract with GDMA be­fore they were ready to move for­ward with charges would have signaled that something was wrong and “GDMA would have got­ten the con­tract back.”

“Without the Navy and Navy’s ac­tions, there would al­most cer­tainly be no story today,” Mabus said.

While the in­vest­ig­a­tion con­tin­ues, the al­leg­a­tions of fraud already have the Navy re­think­ing how it handles some of its con­tracts. Those ac­tions in­clude in­creas­ing the num­ber of items it can set a cer­tain price for while at for­eign ports, cent­ral­iz­ing and stand­ard­iz­ing how top com­mand­ers deal with sup­plies over­seas, and put­ting to­geth­er a “red team of ex­perts” who are to re­view and pos­sibly re­com­mend changes to how the Navy handles con­tract­ing. An audit of hus­band­ing and port ser­vices con­tracts is ex­pec­ted in June.

Mabus said since 2009 the Navy has sus­pen­ded more than 250 con­tract­ors and blocked ap­prox­im­ately 400 more from hold­ing nav­al con­tracts. El­li­ott Branch, the deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of the Navy for Ac­quis­i­tion and Pro­cure­ment, said that rep­res­ents a frac­tion of the tens of thou­sands of con­tract­ors the Navy deals with.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×