Current U.S. plans for maintaining and modernizing the nuclear arsenal are projected to cost taxpayers roughly $355 billion in the next 10 years, Reuters reports.
That figure — produced by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office in a Friday report — constitutes a 72 percent cost spike, by some estimates. The new price tag is nearly $150 billion more than the $208.5 billion estimate the Obama administration provided to Congress in a 2012 report, according to one arms-control advocacy organization.
The United States is still in the planning stages for much of its program to replace retiring nuclear-delivery vehicles, build new fissile-material laboratories and overhaul aging warheads. Expectations are that nuclear-arsenal spending will substantially ramp-up after 2023.
Obama administration modernization plans for strategic and nonstrategic weapon delivery systems include new long-range bombers and ballistic missile-submarines, which are projected to total approximately $136 billion through 2023, according to the 25-page CBO analysis.
Energy Department plans for retrofitting warheads, building new naval reactors and constructing new fissile-material laboratories are estimated to cost $105 billion. An additional $56 billion could be spent on command-and-control technology. The CBO report also accounts for $59 billion in anticipated cost growth.
“The impending nuclear-modernization tidal wave will force increasingly difficult trade-offs between nuclear and conventional capabilities,” Kingston Reif, nuclear nonproliferation director at the Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation, projected.
This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"