Republican Senator’s Pleas to Get Home For His Anniversary Fail

“Sen. Inhofe well knows there are soldiers in Afghanistan right now on their anniversary,” says a fellow Republican.

US Senator James Inhofe is asking the Senate to move quickly on a defense spending measure.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Dec. 19, 2013, 9:53 a.m.

The Sen­ate is sched­uled to work late in­to the night Thursday to pass a de­fense bill, but one mem­ber is beg­ging the world’s most de­lib­er­at­ive body to fin­ish its work in time to get him home to his wife.

“It hap­pens that to­mor­row is my 54th wed­ding an­niversary,” Sen. James In­hofe, R-Okla., said Wed­nes­day. “I would really like to ask both the ma­jor­ity and the minor­ity if we couldn’t yield back a little bit of time.”

The Sen­ate is slated to work on the bill un­til a vote around 11 p.m., but if mem­bers of both parties were will­ing to vol­un­tar­ily trun­cate de­bate, the vote could oc­cure earli­er and get In­hofe home.

“So have mercy, give us a break and let’s try to get this thing voted on and go home and Merry Christ­mas to every­body.”

2013 has been a par­tic­u­larly dif­fi­cult year for In­hofe. He un­der­went emer­gency heart sur­gery in Oc­to­ber, and in Novem­ber his son died in a plane crash. In­hofe didn’t men­tion either event in his plea to the Sen­ate, in­stead fo­cus­ing on his an­niversary plans.

“I would sure like those 20 kids and grandkids that are wait­ing for me — for our big din­ner “¦ to­mor­row night,” he said.

In­hofe, the rank­ing Re­pub­lic­an on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, is the stew­ard of the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act. Passing the bill be­fore year’s end is ne­ces­sary to pre­vent a lapse in crit­ic­al na­tion­al se­cur­ity ini­ti­at­ives, in­clud­ing com­bat pay, mil­it­ary-pay in­creases, re­sources for troops in Afgh­anistan, and coun­terter­ror­ism meas­ures.

In­hofe, to­geth­er with Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Carl Lev­in, has worked to move the bill via an ex­ped­ited pro­cess in or­der to wrap up the meas­ure be­fore Con­gress ad­journs for the year.

That stream­lined pro­cess, however, did not al­low for amend­ments to the de­fense meas­ure, which raised the ire of Re­pub­lic­ans who are still smart­ing over Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id’s de­cision to pare back minor­ity fili­buster rights on ex­ec­ut­ive nom­in­ees.

In re­tali­ation, Re­pub­lic­ans have at times fo­cused on stretch­ing out de­bate as long as pos­sible in re­cent weeks, but In­hofe asked that those dif­fer­ences be put aside.

“I would really like to ask both the ma­jor­ity and the minor­ity if we couldn’t yield back a little bit of time,” he said. “We know we are go­ing to have the votes for this [bill].”

Up­dated at 9:00 p.m.

In­hofe’s plea for an earli­er vote has been re­jec­ted, largely by his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues, and the Ok­laho­man is none-too-pleased about it.

“Today is my 54th wed­ding an­niversary,” In­hofe said Thursday even­ing. “We had a big thing planned to­night, which I had every­body there, all 20 kids and grandkids. And they’re just wast­ing time of course, they are not do­ing any­thing, so I came up here to see if maybe there might be a strategy that we could do it.”

But fel­low Re­pub­lic­an Jeff Ses­sions was un­moved by In­hofe’s plea, as were oth­er party mem­bers frus­trated by their in­ab­il­ity to of­fer amend­ments.

“Sen. In­hofe well knows there are sol­diers in Afgh­anistan right now on their an­niversary,” he said, adding he didn’t ex­pect Re­pub­lic­ans to agree to vote soon­er than the late vote that was in­tii­ally sched­uled.

What We're Following See More »
WITHER TRUMP?
Jon Stewart May Debut on HBO Before the Election
19 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Jon Stewart could arrive on HBO in time for the November presidential election. In a Paley Media Council interview Thursday with CNN’s Brian Stelter, HBO CEO Richard Plepler was asked whether viewers could expect to see Stewart, former host of Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show,” on HBO before the general election. 'Yeah, I’m hopeful,' Plepler said."

Source:
ALL RIDERS TO BE AFFECTED
Metro to Begin Rolling Closures Next Month
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Beginning next month, Metro will begin a series of "about 15 separate large-scale work projects," each of which will close down stations and/or sections of track for up to weeks at a time. The entire initiative is expected to take about a year. The Washington Post has a list of the schedule of closures, and which lines and stations they'll affect.

Source:
ANOTHER MEETING WITH PRIEBUS
Trump to Meet with Ryan, Leadership Next Week
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

A day after saying he could not yet support Donald Trump's presidential bid, House Speaker Paul Ryan has invited the billionaire to a meeting in Washington next week with House leadership. Ryan and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus will also meet separately with Trump. 

Source:
‘EXACTING STANDARDS’
Obama on Trump: ‘This Is a Really Serious Job’
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Obama used the White House podium on Friday to dismiss Donald Trump as an unserious candidate to succeed him, and said leading the country isn't a job that's suited to reality show antics." At a briefing with reporters, the president said, "I just want to emphasize the degree to which we are in serious times and this is a really serious job. This is not entertainment. This is not a reality show. This is a contest for the presidency of the United States. And what that means is that every candidate, every nominee needs to be subject to exacting standards and genuine scrutiny."

Source:
MORE EXECUTIVE ORDERS
Panama Papers Spur White House to Crack Down on Evasion
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In the The White House on Thursday night unveiled a series of executive actions to combat money laundering—"among the most comprehensive response yet to the Panama Papers revelations." The president's orders will tighten transparency rules, close loopholes that allow "foreigners to hide financial activity behind anonymous entities in the U.S., and demand stricter “customer due diligence” rules for banks.

Source:
×