North Korea Executed Kim Jong Un’s Uncle

Abby Ohlheiser, The Wire
See more stories about...
Abby Ohlheiser, The Wire
Dec. 13, 2013, 4:02 a.m.

North Korea said on Thursday that its gov­ern­ment had ex­ecuted Jang Song Thaek, the uncle of lead­er Kim Jong Un.

Un­til re­cently, Jang was widely re­garded as the second most power­ful man in the coun­try. The state-run KCNA news agency called Jang a “trait­or,” claim­ing that he “brought to­geth­er un­desir­able forces” in the coun­try to form an op­pos­i­tion fac­tion. His re­mov­al from power, and ul­ti­mate ex­e­cu­tion, is likely part of Kim’s broad­er strategy to con­sol­id­ate power.

Weeks ago, im­ages and men­tions of Jang began to dis­ap­pear from North Korea’s state-pro­duced me­dia, in­dic­at­ing that some sort of pur­ging was afoot. This week, it be­came clear that his re­mov­al from power was something more than a mo­ment­ary fall­ing out between the two when the state-run me­dia ac­cused Jang of fo­ment­ing dis­sent, wo­man­iz­ing, gambling, and us­ing drugs. On Sunday, the coun­try’s state-run news agency broad­cast im­ages of Jang be­ing for­cibly re­moved from an emer­gency meet­ing of the coun­try’s rul­ing party. Jang was purged once be­fore, in 2004, un­der Kim Jong Il’s rule.

The KCNA re­port on Jang’s ex­e­cu­tion goes even fur­ther to de­mon­ize the char­ac­ter of Kim’s former ment­or, call­ing him “Despic­able hu­man scum” and “worse than a dog”:

“From long ago, Jang had a dirty polit­ic­al am­bi­tion. He dared not raise his head when Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il were alive. But, read­ing their faces, Jang had an axe to grind and in­volved him­self in double-deal­ing. He began re­veal­ing his true col­ors, think­ing that it was just the time for him to real­ize his wild am­bi­tion in the peri­od of his­tor­ic turn when the gen­er­a­tion of the re­volu­tion was re­placed.”

“Jang com­mit­ted such an un­par­don­able thrice-cursed treas­on as overtly and cov­ertly stand­ing in the way of set­tling the is­sue of suc­ces­sion to the lead­er­ship,” KCNA con­tin­ued. Re­portedly, North Korea also ex­ecuted some of Jang’s as­so­ci­ates.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from The Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×