GOP Defense Bill Squabble Leaves Measure in McConnell’s Hands

Nuclear option hangs over choice between Inhofe’s bipartisan deal or Rand Paul’s demands for deliberation.

Stone wall: McConnell & Co. frowns on Obama delays.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Dec. 10, 2013, 7:44 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­an Sens. Tom Coburn and Rand Paul are ob­ject­ing to a bi­par­tis­an deal that would fast-track the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, set­ting up a split GOP caucus and leav­ing Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell with a dif­fi­cult choice to make.

Sen. James In­hofe, the top Re­pub­lic­an on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, has reached a deal with top com­mit­tee Demo­crat Carl Lev­in that is de­signed to move the bill be­fore year’s end. To make that hap­pen, the House would pass a com­prom­ise ver­sion of the bill be­fore their ex­pec­ted de­par­ture Fri­day, and then the Sen­ate would pass an identic­al ver­sion the fol­low­ing week. The plan would not al­low for amend­ments to the bill, and that’s a stick­ing point for Paul and Coburn, who told re­port­ers on Tues­day they ob­ject to the bill.

“I’m not OK,” said Coburn. “When was the last time we had a [de­fense] bill without any amend­ments on it? Over 50 years ago.”

Said Paul: “We will do everything we can to try to force de­bate around here.”

The fast-track plan’s fate now rests partly in the hands of Mc­Con­nell, whose de­cision will be a guide — al­beit not a bind­ing one — for oth­er cham­ber Re­pub­lic­ans as they de­cide wheth­er to move the meas­ure. And sup­port for passing a bill without amend­ments is made all the more dif­fi­cult by Harry Re­id’s de­cision last month to in­voke the “nuc­le­ar op­tion,” a rules change that gut­ted the minor­ity’s abil­ity to fili­buster nom­in­ees.

The battle is not purely over pro­ced­ure: Paul, Coburn, and oth­er sen­at­ors are all push­ing amend­ments that would achieve key policy pri­or­it­ies. Coburn is seek­ing sev­er­al budget-re­lated amend­ments, in­clud­ing an audit of the Pentagon.

Paul said he wanted to see amend­ments on in­def­in­ite ter­ror­ist de­ten­tions, on Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand plan to change the way the mil­it­ary deals with sexu­al as­sault, and on a pro­vi­sion aimed at send­ing ques­tions about Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency de­cisions to the Su­preme Court rather than the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act court.

In­hofe said he plans to talk to Mc­Con­nell and pre­sum­ably the rest of his col­leagues at the weekly lunch Tues­day, but he stressed that there is not time for a floor de­bate on the bill.

“We are talk­ing to him. We are go­ing to have a con­ver­sa­tion on this at 1 today,” he told re­port­ers. “But I’m very hope­ful. We are down now so the choices are few: Either we have this bill, this com­prom­ised bill, this big core bill, or we don’t have a bill at all. And the dis­aster that would take place if we did not have a bill at all we could not do.”

He in­sisted that this is a make-or-break mo­ment for the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill.

In­hofe said, “It’s not a strategy, it’s wheth­er you want a bill or not.”

The Lev­in-In­hofe deal — which also has the back­ing of House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon — in­cludes 79 amend­ments that lead­ers rolled in­to the bill be­hind the scenes. The de­fense bill has passed 51 years in a row, and there is pres­sure to con­tin­ue the trend, es­pe­cially as fail­ing to fi­nal­ize the meas­ure by year’s end would delay com­bat pay in­creases and oth­er changes to sol­diers’ com­pens­a­tion.

Across the aisle, Lev­in ap­pears to have a smooth­er path to caucus sup­port, but he’s wait­ing to hear from his fel­low Demo­crats as he dis­cusses the bill dur­ing their lunch Tues­day.

“I have not heard of [ob­jec­tions]; that doesn’t mean there aren’t any,” he said. “I would hope not, be­cause I think it is in every­one’s in­terest to pass a bill.”

Lev­in ad­ded there is no oth­er choice: “This is not the best way to pro­ceed ob­vi­ously, but we tried for a week and there was so many ob­jec­tions that we couldn’t even get cleared amend­ments passed, so there’s no way we could pass a bill here today or to­mor­row and get it to the House be­fore they ad­journ,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×