GOP Discord Leaves Defense Spending Bill in Limbo

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) (L) listens to an aide during a hearing before the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee September 26,2 103 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The hearing was focused on the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Legislation.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Dec. 9, 2013, 4:48 p.m.

Waver­ing sup­port from Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship is threat­en­ing to de­rail a fast-track plan to pass a Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act be­fore the House leaves town Fri­day, a man­euver that would spare mem­bers the em­bar­rass­ment of be­ing the rare Con­gress that fails to pass the meas­ure be­fore year’s end.

Lead­ers of the Sen­ate and House Armed Ser­vices com­mit­tees have struck a bi­par­tis­an deal in which both cham­bers pass identic­al le­gis­la­tion — the House this week be­fore ad­journ­ing and the Sen­ate the next. The plan would block mem­bers of either body from mak­ing amend­ments to the meas­ure, an ex­pedi­ency the plan’s pro­ponents say is ne­ces­sary due to the tight tim­ing.

“The choices are not, “˜Do you want to have an NDAA bill the way we are hav­ing it here, or do you want to have one the nor­mal way it takes place?’ be­cause that is not pos­sible any­more,” Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices rank­ing mem­ber James In­hofe, R-Okla., said in a press con­fer­ence an­noun­cing the Armed Ser­vices lead­ers’ deal Monday.

“There is not the time to go through a pro­cess where you are go­ing to have amend­ments,” In­hofe said. “That is be­hind us.”

But In­hofe ac­know­ledged he did not have as­sur­ances that Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship will sup­port the deal and agree to pass the bill without amend­ments in the Sen­ate.

“I can’t tell you we have a com­mit­ment on the Re­pub­lic­an side for this,” In­hofe said. “We have a lot more sup­port than we would have had, or than we did have dur­ing con­sid­er­a­tion of the bill.”

Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell’s of­fice said it had not seen the de­tails Monday even­ing. Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in, D-Mich., re­it­er­ated re­marks Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id made on the floor Monday that Demo­crats hope the House will send over the de­fense bill this week.

Com­mit­tee mem­bers were due to be briefed on the deal Monday night, and Lev­in said he will present the agree­ment to the Demo­crat­ic Caucus at lunch Tues­day.

“This is the only way we can pass a bill this year,” Lev­in said, point­ing out that a sim­il­ar strategy was used in 2008 and 2010 to pass the bill.

Pro­ponents of the plan are cau­tiously op­tim­ist­ic about their chances in the House — which passed its ver­sion of the NDAA in June with a wide mar­gin.

But Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans were angered last month when they were un­able to of­fer amend­ments to the massive an­nu­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill in an open pro­cess on the floor. That frus­tra­tion has only grown since Sen­ate Demo­crats de­ployed the so-called nuc­le­ar op­tion to gut Re­pub­lic­ans’ abil­ity to fili­buster ex­ec­ut­ive nom­in­ees.

And if rank-and-file mem­bers are de­term­ined to slow the meas­ure, they can ob­ject to the pro­cess and throw up pro­ced­ur­al hurdles that drag it out.

None of this pre­cludes Con­gress from beat­ing the clock: De­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bills have routinely come close to lapsing only to be saved in a last-minute deal.

But for that to work this time around, Con­gress will have to get agree­ment — or at least ac­qui­es­cence — on a string of dif­fi­cult is­sues.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., is push­ing a spate of budget amend­ments, in­clud­ing a meas­ure to audit the Pentagon. And the bill does not ad­dress ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions against Ir­an, an is­sue that Re­id on Monday ac­know­ledged still needs to be ad­dressed.

A seni­or Sen­ate aide said the lack of ac­tion on Ir­an sanc­tions could be a prob­lem for some mem­bers. “This duck won’t hunt with sev­er­al sen­at­ors if the bill doesn’t in­clude Ir­an sanc­tions,” said the aide. “Lev­in could have a bi­par­tis­an re­volt on his hands if he ig­nores the grow­ing calls to put a bi­par­tis­an sanc­tions text in the NDAA.”

Oth­er amend­ments that would be left be­hind in­clude: a bid from Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand, D-N.Y., to change the way the mil­it­ary deals with sexu­al-as­sault al­leg­a­tions; a com­pet­ing amend­ment from Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., aimed at ad­dress­ing the same is­sue; and ef­forts to rein in the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s do­mest­ic spy­ing pro­grams.

House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee lead­ers are try­ing to pree­mpt­ively as­suage com­plaints about amend­ments by not­ing they con­sidered 87 amend­ments be­hind the scenes and reached an agree­ment to in­cor­por­ate 79 of them in­to the re­vised bill.

The mem­bers will also claim cred­it for strik­ing a deal on how to handle de­tain­ees at the Guantanamo Bay de­ten­tion fa­cil­ity that the ad­min­is­tra­tion wants to close; the House and Sen­ate split the dif­fer­ence between their ap­proaches.

The com­prom­ise in­cludes a nod to the House by pre­vent­ing the trans­fer of de­tain­ees to the U.S., but it would al­low the trans­fer of de­tain­ees to oth­er coun­tries un­der cer­tain con­di­tions, as the Sen­ate bill had al­lowed.

The bill would au­thor­ize $552.1 bil­lion in spend­ing for na­tion­al de­fense and an ad­di­tion­al $80.7 bil­lion for over­seas con­tin­gency op­er­a­tions.

In mak­ing the case why the bill has to be fi­nal­ized this month, In­hofe stressed that au­thor­iz­a­tions for de­fense pro­grams and com­bat pay ex­pire at the end of the year. The mil­it­ary would con­tin­ue to be fun­ded even if the au­thor­iz­a­tion bill lapses, but the lack of le­gis­la­tion would pre­vent sched­uled pay in­creases and hard­ship com­pens­a­tion from tak­ing ef­fect.

And that Janu­ary will be dom­in­ated by budget and spend­ing battles over the ex­pir­ing con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the gov­ern­ment and the debt ceil­ing.

“We are go­ing to be spend­ing all of our time on the CR. After that we have the debt lim­it so it’s just not go­ing to be done un­less it’s done this way,” In­hofe said. “It’s crit­ic­al that people un­der­stand that.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×