Farmers Used Facebook to Harvest Votes for Cochran

MADISON, MS - JUNE 24: U.S. Sen Thad Cochran (R-MS) walks by the kitchen at Mama Hamil's restaurant on June 24, 2014 in Madison, Mississippi. U.S. Senate incumbent U.S. Sen Thad Cochran (R-MS) is fighting for his political life in a tight race against Tea Party-backed republican candidate for U.S. Senate, Mississippi State Sen Chris McDaniel. 
National Journal
Jerry Hagstrom
July 13, 2014, 4:26 p.m.

Add this to the shock and awe that sur­rounds the come-from-be­hind vic­tory of Sen. Thad Co­chran, R-Miss, in his primary run­off: the fact that farm­ers can still mat­ter in an elec­tion and that farm­ers and their fam­il­ies com­mu­nic­ate through Face­book and oth­er so­cial me­dia much more than polit­ic­al ana­lysts real­ized.

For dec­ades, the de­cline in the farm pop­u­la­tion and the ac­com­pa­ny­ing loss of polit­ic­al power in elec­tions has been a tru­ism in Amer­ic­an polit­ics. High-speed In­ter­net ser­vice has been slow to come to rur­al Amer­ica, and in some areas, cell-phone ser­vice is spotty. But when Co­chran nar­rowly lost his primary, Mis­sis­sippi farm­ers””led by their soy­bean grow­ers””sprang in­to ac­tion in ways that ap­pear un­pre­ced­en­ted.

Co­chran reaped slightly few­er votes than tea-party com­pet­it­or state Sen. Chris McDaniel in the primary, but neither got 50 per­cent of the vote, trig­ger­ing a run­off. That’s when a Co­chran cam­paign con­sult­ant called Danny Murphy, a big Mis­sis­sippi farm­er, and asked for help get­ting more farm­ers out to vote for Co­chran. 

Murphy said he would do what he could, partly out of re­spect for Co­chran’s sup­port for the farm bill and all the fed­er­al money that Co­chran has brought to Mis­sis­sippi, and partly out of fear of McDaniel’s com­mit­ment to get the gov­ern­ment out of everything.

Murphy, who was in Wash­ing­ton last week for an Amer­ic­an Soy­bean As­so­ci­ation board meet­ing, said in an in­ter­view that he in turn called Patrick Delaney, the Wash­ing­ton-based com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the Amer­ic­an Soy­bean As­so­ci­ation, and asked him wheth­er he thought they could use so­cial me­dia to spread the word that a Co­chran vic­tory was vi­tal for the fu­ture of Mis­sis­sippi ag­ri­cul­ture.

Dur­ing the weeks between the primary and the run­off, Murphy cre­ated an or­gan­iz­a­tion called Farm­ers for Thad and got cot­ton, rice, pea­nut, cat­fish, and live­stock pro­du­cers in­volved while Delaney cre­ated a Face­book page that got as­ton­ish­ing re­cep­tion.

Murphy said he was in­spired to use so­cial me­dia partly by Barack Obama’s suc­cess­ful use of it in his 2008 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. He had also seen the way op­pon­ents of ge­net­ic modi­fic­a­tion and an­im­al-wel­fare ad­voc­ates, such as the Hu­mane So­ci­ety of the United States, have been able to use so­cial me­dia to dom­in­ate the con­ver­sa­tion on those sub­jects. But Obama, the anti-GMO ad­voc­ates, and the Hu­mane So­ci­ety have found their audi­ence among young, urb­an, tech-minded lib­er­als, while Farm­ers for Thad have proven that so­cial me­dia can also work with an older, rur­al Re­pub­lic­an audi­ence.

Murphy was already on Face­book through his wife, and in one of his early mes­sages to the Mis­sis­sippi Soy­bean As­so­ci­ation board, he en­cour­aged them to “share the mes­sage” through so­cial me­dia. Older farm­ers may not be nat­ur­ally in­clined to open a Face­book ac­count, Murphy said, but “if you have grand­chil­dren, it is a pre­requis­ite that you have Face­book to keep up with them.”

Back in Wash­ing­ton, Delaney did a lot of re­search on Co­chran’s im­pact on ag­ri­cul­tur­al policy and de­fense of Mis­sis­sippi ag­ri­cul­ture dur­ing the de­bate on the farm bill, and he pos­ted those items. In Mis­sis­sippi, Murphy said, Eliza­beth Jack, the wife of Mis­sis­sippi Soy­bean As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Jeremy Jack, pos­ted many items as well.

Murphy learned that volume makes so­cial me­dia work.

“If I had ima­gined at the be­gin­ning we would have thought one [post] a day would have been enough, we ended up with eight or 10,” he said. “Each post may not [strike] one per­son, but the next may strike that per­son.” All to­geth­er, there were 269 posts in 14 days.

Ac­cord­ing to stat­ist­ics Delaney has kept, in the 14 days be­fore the run­off, Farm­ers for Thad garnered 554 likes, with 200 of them com­ing in the last days of the race, and reached a total of 68,844 people over 14 days in­clud­ing 13,368 people on June 14 alone.

The most pop­u­lar item, Delaney said, was an art­icle in The Clari­on-Ledger in Jack­son about a McDaniel ap­pear­ance in the Mis­sis­sippi Delta, the state’s prime farm­ing area, in which he de­clined to com­mit him­self to sup­port fu­ture farm sub­sidies.

“We’re go­ing to make sure Mis­sis­sippi’s farm­ers have everything they need to be suc­cess­ful,” McDaniel said at a news con­fer­ence, The Clari­on-Ledger re­por­ted. “We’re go­ing to make sure that in­dustry grows along with the rest of our state’s in­dus­tries, as we cre­ate an en­vir­on­ment for growth.”

Asked if that growth would in­clude fed­er­al sub­sidies,” McDaniel said, “I’ve answered the ques­tion.”

That post reached 15,500 people, Delaney said.

It’s im­possible to cal­cu­late just how im­port­ant the Farm­ers for Thad Face­book ef­fort was, but Jen­nifer Duffy, the Sen­ate ana­lyst for The Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port, said it un­doubtedly con­trib­uted to ex­actly what Co­chran needed: a high­er turnout in the counties that already were in­clined to sup­port him. Murphy said the Co­chran cam­paign also used the Farm­ers for Thad mod­el for oth­er Face­book sites in the fi­nal days of the cam­paign.

One factor that the soy­bean grow­ers either don’t know or are un­will­ing to talk about is how much of an im­pact Farm­ers for Thad may have had on the turnout of black voters. Most of the big farm­ers who be­long to or­gan­ized farm groups in Mis­sis­sippi are white, but there are black farm­ers and oth­er black rur­al res­id­ents in Mis­sis­sippi to whom the Co­chran cam­paign ap­pealed for votes.

It’s un­clear who may cap­it­al­ize on the know­ledge gained from the Farm­ers for Thad Face­book ef­fort. Murphy said the group will sup­port Co­chran in the elec­tion and will tell tea parti­ers who are threat­en­ing not to vote that a Co­chran loss could mean the Re­pub­lic­ans won’t take the Sen­ate.

Murphy, of course, says that Co­chran him­self de­serves a lot of cred­it for step­ping up his cam­paign in the run­off.

But Murphy doesn’t dis­count the im­port­ance of the ef­fort, and he cred­its Delaney’s tech­nic­al know­ledge.

“By us­ing so­cial me­dia, we were able to take our mes­sage out and get it shared in a large part of the state that we wouldn’t have been to able to do on an in­di­vidu­al basis,” he said.

The suc­cess of the Farm­ers for Thad Face­book cam­paign is the biggest de­vel­op­ment in rur­al polit­ics this year, and it has many les­sons for the fu­ture. Farm­ers have al­ways been in­flu­en­tial mem­bers in their com­munit­ies and act­ive in polit­ics. Through Face­book, they may re­gain some of the in­flu­ence they have lost as ag­ri­cul­ture has mech­an­ized, be­cause they can more eas­ily com­mu­nic­ate not only with oth­er farm­ers but also with their non­farm neigh­bors.

It will be in­ter­est­ing to see wheth­er there are more rur­al Face­book sur­prises.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×