Democrats Face Unfair Fight in Midterms

Democrats face a heavy headwind going into the midterms due to the president’s low approval ratings.

US President Barack Obama speaks during the White House Summit on Working Families on June 23, 2014 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Charlie Cook
June 23, 2014, 5:30 p.m.

Gen­er­ally speak­ing, the fur­ther in­to a U.S. pres­id­ent’s ten­ure in of­fice one gets, the less volat­il­ity there is in that pres­id­ent’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing.

It’s pretty lo­gic­al that 1,979 days in­to Barack Obama’s pres­id­ency, the num­ber of people most in­clined to ap­prove of his per­form­ance has sta­bil­ized, as has the num­ber of those dis­posed to dis­ap­prove of him. Giv­en that Obama tends to evoke par­tic­u­larly strong emo­tions with bed­rock sup­port­ers and equally adam­ant op­pon­ents, ar­gu­ably more people than usu­al have locked in their opin­ions. And those who are un­de­cided by this point are the folks who have pretty much checked out of polit­ics and are un­likely to come down on one side or the oth­er. Simply put, there are few people left who are am­bi­val­ent about Obama’s per­form­ance. We see large vari­ances at this point only when we com­pare the res­ults of one poll­ster to an­oth­er. These vari­ances are likely the res­ult of in­di­vidu­al firms’ unique meth­od­o­lo­gies and sampling idio­syn­crasies; they do not rep­res­ent the genu­ine chan­ging of minds.

With the Gal­lup Or­gan­iz­a­tion sampling a little more than 500 adults per night, around 7,500 in a week (with a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 1.13 with a 95 per­cent con­fid­ence level) and 15,000 in a month (mar­gin of er­ror +/-.8), the lar­ger samples are more ac­cur­ate. Each weekly poll con­sists of at least three times more in­ter­views than the typ­ic­al na­tion­al poll of between 800 and 1,000 re­spond­ents; thus with Gal­lup us­ing uni­form meth­od­o­logy, it is the most use­ful poll to track the subtle shifts that do ac­tu­ally oc­cur.

Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing since his 2012 reelec­tion has de­clined gradu­ally through 2013. It picked up a bit in 2014, to an av­er­age of 44 per­cent ap­prov­al and 51 per­cent dis­ap­prov­al for the months of April and May. To be clear, these are bad ap­prov­al rat­ings, but they have been worse, and they now ap­pear to have sta­bil­ized in the spring of this year, at that 44 per­cent level. It is not that sur­pris­ing, though, that the af­ter­math of the con­tro­versy sur­round­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s trade of five Guantanamo de­tain­ees for Army Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl, com­bined with the dis­clos­ures con­cern­ing the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs health care sys­tem, would move the pres­id­ent’s ap­prov­al and dis­ap­prov­al needles. Over Gal­lup’s sev­en-day sampling peri­od end­ing Sat­urday, June 21, Obama’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing was 41 per­cent (with a dis­ap­prov­al of 54 per­cent). Dur­ing the week of June 9-15, the same poll showed the pres­id­ent with an ap­prov­al rat­ing of 42 per­cent — note­worthy be­cause for the full months of April and May, Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing re­mained at 44 per­cent.

In polit­ics and polling, as in real es­tate, un­der­wa­ter or “up­side down” ap­prov­al rat­ings are not a good thing for an elec­ted of­fi­cial. Moreover, in the case of a pres­id­ent head­ing in­to a midterm elec­tion, with the midterm of­ten said to be a ref­er­en­dum on the in­cum­bent pres­id­ent, this is a bad thing for the pres­id­ent’s party. Every point de­cline cre­ates just a bit more head­wind against Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates fa­cing dif­fi­cult races across the coun­try. Spe­cific­ally, this makes the chal­lenge even more oner­ous for the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates where the party is de­fend­ing U.S. Sen­ate seats in the six states that Mitt Rom­ney car­ried by 14 points or more in 2012: in­cum­bents Mark Be­gich in Alaska, Mark Pry­or in Arkan­sas, Mary Landrieu in Louisi­ana, and ap­poin­ted Sen. John Walsh in Montana, along with Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates in open seats in South Dakota and West Vir­gin­ia. While that is some­what self-evid­ent — a lot of people talk about the Demo­crat­ic chal­lenge in hold­ing onto their Sen­ate ma­jor­ity — it seems that this prob­lem is of­ten un­der­stated. Per­suad­ing people who dis­ap­prove of a sit­ting pres­id­ent to still vote for a Sen­ate can­did­ate of that pres­id­ent’s party is a real chal­lenge in a midterm elec­tion.

Com­pound­ing this prob­lem for Demo­crats is the makeup of the midterm elect­or­ate. This midterm-vot­ing group is older, whiter, more con­ser­vat­ive, and more Re­pub­lic­an than those who turn out in a pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. Young and minor­ity voters who flocked to the polls in 2008 and 2012 are very dif­fi­cult to mo­tiv­ate for a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate who very clearly isn’t Barack Obama. They got revved up for Obama in a pres­id­en­tial elec­tion year, but can en­dangered Demo­crats now get these voters ex­cited for them in a midterm as well? The op­pos­i­tion is gal­van­ized, but get­ting these more sporad­ic voters to turn out is far harder.

Those who seem to think that this elec­tion is a fair fight, tak­ing place on a level play­ing field, are badly mis­taken.

What We're Following See More »
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
9 hours ago

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
11 hours ago

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
14 hours ago

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Sanders Wants a Recount in Kentucky
16 hours ago

Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.

McAuliffe Under Investigation for Fundraising
19 hours ago

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) “is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the FBI and … the Justice Department” for potentially improper contributions to his 2013 campaign, including while he was a Clinton Global Initiative board member. ... Among the McAuliffe donations that drew the interest of the investigators was $120,000 from” former Chinese legislator Wang Wenliang. “U.S. election law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to … elections. … But Wang holds U.S. permanent resident status.”