Even before Eric Cantor’s seismic loss to a political novice backed by the tea party last week, many Republican elders had concluded that Jeb Bush, who really wants to become the third President Bush, won’t run in 2016.
The emerging consensus explains why some of these party mandarins have launched a new political boomlet touting the ex-Florida governor: Jeb for Veep.
At first the notion seems a little weird. While a reliable ideological conservative, Bush is a dreaded mainstream Republican. Worse yet for many on the Right, he’s a fervent booster of comprehensive immigration reform. That provokes apoplexy among many tea-party faithful and other GOP conservatives.
With Cantor’s defeat blamed in part on his apparent willingness to entertain a middle ground on immigration, Bush as second banana on a ticket headed by a more conservative Republican would seem to be a nonstarter.
Not so fast, some GOP heavy-hitters maintain.
“Jeb would be perfectly acceptable to the base if the nominee is a proven conservative,” said a prominent Republican consultant. “If it’s [New Jersey Gov. Chris] Christie or some moderate, Jeb would be a no go. On the other hand, if a right-wing nominee wanted to make a bow towards the middle and add some Hispanic vote appeal, Jeb would be a good choice.”
“He has name ID, a Spanish background, [is] a former governor, and he’s conservative.”
Legendary political operative Stu Spencer was even more emphatic about Jeb’s value to a party anxious to attract independents and swing Democrats in 2016.
“Jeb could be a safe choice for anybody,” said Spencer, who worked for three Republican presidents. “He has name ID, a Spanish background, [is] a former governor, and he’s conservative.”
Ironically, it was Spencer who pushed Ronald Reagan to pick Jeb’s father, George H.W. Bush, as his running mate in 1980. En route to the Detroit convention, Spencer told Reagan he needed a No. 2 more moderate than himself to beat President Carter. At first Reagan balked, believing Bush a little too squishy. But eventually he sided with Spencer, Bush campaign manager James Baker, and other moderates, and tapped Bush for the ticket.
Like Reagan, a conservative 2016 nominee would benefit from the perception of picking a more moderate running mate, Spencer argued.
“He’s the perfect No. 2 for any Republican ticket,” said a top GOP fundraiser who echoed Spencer in promoting Bush. “It makes a world of sense.”
A spokesman for Bush called such speculation “very premature.”
Bush has remained rigorously quiet about his options — even brother George W. Bush remains in the dark about his younger sibling’s leanings. He’s told insiders what he says publicly: He’ll talk with his family after the November midterm elections and decide soon thereafter.
But his wife Columba’s big-time opposition to a presidential run leads many Republican leaders to assume Jeb Bush won’t be a candidate. That doesn’t necessarily rule out a spot on the ticket; given the Bush family’s sense of public service, it might be hard for Bush to reject an appeal from the GOP nominee to help out.
Bush is an unabashed conservative, the theory goes, but a kinder, gentler version who can appeal to mainstream Republicans, conservative Democrats, and independents. He would even theoretically pass muster with conservative red-hots who think he’s too establishment — especially since he speaks Spanish like a native and is popular with Hispanic voters turned off by the GOP’s hard line on immigration reform.
“A straight-up tea-party ticket cannot win,” adds one of the GOP’s most prominent fundraisers. “Too many Republicans and independents will just flat-out not vote for a ticket with two tea-party guys. It will not happen.”
And if he has to campaign for only three months as a veep nominee instead of more than two years swimming upstream to be president, a senior Bush family source predicts his wife would sign off. “Being picked for president-in-waiting would be ideal for him and his family,” the consultant said.
Bush’s prospects for the second spot would test whether the no-prisoners Right looking to purge the party of mainstream Republicans could abide another Bush — or if, like the pragmatic conservative Reagan, they’re willing to throw a bone to the middle to boost their chances of capturing the White House.
At least for the moment, that’s not a popular notion in some conservative quarters.
“If you put someone on the ticket who supports Common Core [education standards] and bank bailouts and the list goes on, you are taking grassroots energy away from your candidacy,” said FreedomWorks communications director Jackie Bodnar. “Picking a Jeb Bush would really demonstrate how out of touch the traditional, old-guard Republicans are with their constituents back home.”
But Alfonso Aguilar of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles calls Bush “a smart and intelligent choice” for potential presidential nominees like Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz or Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
“Jeb Bush would deliver Florida for Republicans, increase our ability to raise money, and is practically Hispanic,” Aguilar said. “If the choice is made by the top of the ticket and he is a conservative candidate, I think the conservative base would go along with it.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”