The two senators who shepherded the lone appropriations bill to reach the Senate floor last year are showing flashes of optimism about the process this year.
Sens. Patty Murray of Washington and Susan Collins of Maine saw their Transportation-Housing and Urban Development bill blocked last year over GOP fears of busting the Budget Control Act caps. This year, though, lawmakers have a sunnier outlook.
“I suspect that this year will be easier because we have a budget and we’ve written the bill to the budget level,” Collins said.
That sentiment jibes with plans made by Democratic leaders and Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, with aides confirming that Majority Leader Harry Reid intends to consider some of the bills on the floor during the last two weeks in June and two weeks in July ahead of the August recess.
But as the full committee prepares Thursday to mark up the Transportation-Housing and Urban Development and the Commerce, Justice, and Science bills, a sense of skepticism that Congress really will move all 12 bills is pervasive.
Despite the two-year budget deal, which set the overall spending levels that bind appropriators, there are already signs of mistrust on both sides of the aisle. Privately, Democrats worry that once the bills reach the floor Republicans will seek policy riders that amount to poison pills.
Specifically, aides worry that the funding bill for the Labor and Health and Human Services departments, which is traditionally controversial, could rankle Republicans. The committee has not taken up that bill yet.
For their part, Senate Republicans are abiding by the budget deal. Appropriators have unanimously moved the Agriculture and Veterans Affairs appropriations bills to the floor, for instance.
“The Murray-Ryan budget agreement has provided us the foundation to begin our work,” ranking Republican Richard Shelby of Alabama said in a statement in support of the Commerce, Justice, Science measure.
But Republicans have criticized Senate Democrats for $19 billion in budget outlay requests beyond what House Republicans have sought. Democrats dispute this, saying their budget authority figure matches House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s figure.
The appropriations bills also come to the floor at a time of heightened partisan tension over procedural battles, to say nothing of campaign season. Many political handicappers say Republicans have a good shot at taking the majority. Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are angry, having felt the sting of Reid’s rules change, which made it harder for them to block President Obama’s nominees. They also complain — correctly — that Reid prevents them from offering amendments.
Still, the appropriations process is unfolding. Tasked with allocating $1.014 trillion in funds for the government’s discretionary programs and with time until the August recess running down, Mikulski may package some of the bills together in what insiders call “minibuses,” legislation that is smaller than an omnibus but more than a single spending measure.
While the budget deal put spending crises in the rearview mirror for now, senators are suggesting roadblocks remain. “I think there are a number of members who want regular order to occur and want these to move forward,” Murray said. “We’ll see if they get tied up otherwise.”
Meanwhile, the House has already passed three appropriations bills, and aides say leadership will put the THUD bill on the floor when lawmakers return next week.
The Senate has yet to pass even one appropriations bill.
- 1 Hillary Clinton Will Win the Nomination, But Then What?
- 2 Would Obama’s Paid Sick Leave Proposal Actually Work? Look to San Francisco.
- 3 Do Republicans Believe in Global Warming? Not if They’re in the Tea Party
- 4 In the Iowa caucuses, look for results that surprise you
- 5 Paul Ryan Would Be the Most Conservative House Speaker in Recent History
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.