Senate Spending Bills Are on a Smooth Path — for Now

While the budget deal helped, some senators see roadblocks ahead.

U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) (C) talks to reporters as she is on his way to the Senate Chamber for a vote March 24, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The Senate has passed a cloture vote 78-17 to advance a package that will aid sanctions regarding Russias annexation of Crimea in Ukraine.  
National Journal
Michael Catalini
June 4, 2014, 4:09 p.m.

The two sen­at­ors who shep­her­ded the lone ap­pro­pri­ations bill to reach the Sen­ate floor last year are show­ing flashes of op­tim­ism about the pro­cess this year.

Sens. Patty Mur­ray of Wash­ing­ton and Susan Collins of Maine saw their Trans­port­a­tion-Hous­ing and Urb­an De­vel­op­ment bill blocked last year over GOP fears of bust­ing the Budget Con­trol Act caps. This year, though, law­makers have a sun­ni­er out­look.

“I sus­pect that this year will be easi­er be­cause we have a budget and we’ve writ­ten the bill to the budget level,” Collins said.

That sen­ti­ment jibes with plans made by Demo­crat­ic lead­ers and Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Mikul­ski, with aides con­firm­ing that Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id in­tends to con­sider some of the bills on the floor dur­ing the last two weeks in June and two weeks in Ju­ly ahead of the Au­gust re­cess.

But as the full com­mit­tee pre­pares Thursday to mark up the Trans­port­a­tion-Hous­ing and Urb­an De­vel­op­ment and the Com­merce, Justice, and Sci­ence bills, a sense of skep­ti­cism that Con­gress really will move all 12 bills is per­vas­ive.

Des­pite the two-year budget deal, which set the over­all spend­ing levels that bind ap­pro­pri­at­ors, there are already signs of mis­trust on both sides of the aisle. Privately, Demo­crats worry that once the bills reach the floor Re­pub­lic­ans will seek policy riders that amount to pois­on pills.

Spe­cific­ally, aides worry that the fund­ing bill for the Labor and Health and Hu­man Ser­vices de­part­ments, which is tra­di­tion­ally con­tro­ver­sial, could rankle Re­pub­lic­ans. The com­mit­tee has not taken up that bill yet.

For their part, Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans are abid­ing by the budget deal. Ap­pro­pri­at­ors have un­an­im­ously moved the Ag­ri­cul­ture and Vet­er­ans Af­fairs ap­pro­pri­ations bills to the floor, for in­stance.

“The Mur­ray-Ry­an budget agree­ment has provided us the found­a­tion to be­gin our work,” rank­ing Re­pub­lic­an Richard Shelby of Alabama said in a state­ment in sup­port of the Com­merce, Justice, Sci­ence meas­ure.

But Re­pub­lic­ans have cri­ti­cized Sen­ate Demo­crats for $19 bil­lion in budget out­lay re­quests bey­ond what House Re­pub­lic­ans have sought. Demo­crats dis­pute this, say­ing their budget au­thor­ity fig­ure matches House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an’s fig­ure.

The ap­pro­pri­ations bills also come to the floor at a time of heightened par­tis­an ten­sion over pro­ced­ur­al battles, to say noth­ing of cam­paign sea­son. Many polit­ic­al han­di­cap­pers say Re­pub­lic­ans have a good shot at tak­ing the ma­jor­ity. Mean­while, Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans are angry, hav­ing felt the sting of Re­id’s rules change, which made it harder for them to block Pres­id­ent Obama’s nom­in­ees. They also com­plain — cor­rectly — that Re­id pre­vents them from of­fer­ing amend­ments.

Still, the ap­pro­pri­ations pro­cess is un­fold­ing. Tasked with al­loc­at­ing $1.014 tril­lion in funds for the gov­ern­ment’s dis­cre­tion­ary pro­grams and with time un­til the Au­gust re­cess run­ning down, Mikul­ski may pack­age some of the bills to­geth­er in what in­siders call “minibuses,” le­gis­la­tion that is smal­ler than an om­ni­bus but more than a single spend­ing meas­ure.

While the budget deal put spend­ing crises in the rear­view mir­ror for now, sen­at­ors are sug­gest­ing road­b­locks re­main. “I think there are a num­ber of mem­bers who want reg­u­lar or­der to oc­cur and want these to move for­ward,” Mur­ray said. “We’ll see if they get tied up oth­er­wise.”

Mean­while, the House has already passed three ap­pro­pri­ations bills, and aides say lead­er­ship will put the THUD bill on the floor when law­makers re­turn next week.

The Sen­ate has yet to pass even one ap­pro­pri­ations bill.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×