Is Monica Wehby the Most Interesting Senate Candidate of 2014?

Some say a moderate Republican with no political experience can compete in Oregon.

Monica Wehby
National Journal
Andrea Drusch
May 18, 2014, 5:49 a.m.

Hours be­fore de­cid­ing to leave be­hind dec­ades of edu­ca­tion and train­ing to make a long-shot U.S. Sen­ate run, pe­di­at­ric neurosur­geon Mon­ica We­hby sat star­ing out the win­dow of her home of­fice in Port­land, Ore. Then she picked up the phone and called a cur­rent sen­at­or who might be as un­usu­al as her­self.

At 51, We­hby would likely be the first brain sur­geon to serve in Con­gress if she won. She’s a single moth­er of four, she’s nev­er run for of­fice, and she’s spent the last 16 years op­er­at­ing on chil­dren with high-risk brain con­di­tions. She’s also a Re­pub­lic­an who be­lieves abor­tion is a de­cision to be made between in­di­vidu­al wo­men and their doc­tors, and that mar­riage of any sort is a per­son­al de­cision.

We­hby’s coun­selor that day was more con­ser­vat­ive, but Sen. Tom Coburn could re­late pro­fes­sion­ally — the Ok­lahoma Re­pub­lic­an had twice left medi­cine to run for Con­gress. “When I was try­ing to make a fi­nal de­cision, I asked Tom, ‘How did you de­cide to take that jump?’ ” We­hby said. “He goes, ‘Mon­ica, you’re not leav­ing the kids, you’re go­ing to be tak­ing care of all the kids, all the Ore­go­ni­ans, the whole coun­try.’ And that’s what did it. He was the fi­nal push that this was the right thing to do.”

As red-state primar­ies push Re­pub­lic­ans fur­ther and fur­ther right, and as the parties seek “out­sider” can­did­ates but of­ten end up with gray­ing politi­cians, We­hby is un­like any oth­er GOP can­did­ate on the map in 2014. In Ore­gon, where the party hasn’t won a statewide elec­tion at any level in a dozen years, Re­pub­lic­ans are ex­cited about their chances with a mod­er­ate com­ing from out­side the Belt­way.

“Ore­gon mod­er­ates and in­de­pend­ent wo­men are go­ing to be ex­cited in a way they haven’t been ex­cited about a statewide Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate here in a long time,” said Elaine Frank­lin, an Ore­gon GOP con­sult­ant.

“Mod­er­ates have a hard time get­ting through Ore­gon primar­ies be­cause of the right-wing evan­gel­ic­al move­ment,” Frank­lin ex­plained. “But it’s al­most im­possible for a pro-life, an­ti­gay can­did­ate to win statewide.”

The race is still an up­hill climb. Ore­gon, like the rest of the mostly lib­er­al West Coast, is gen­er­ally hos­tile to Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates, and fresh­man Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jeff Merkley is no easy out, des­pite win­ning of­fice by a razor-thin mar­gin in 2008. We­hby, a new­comer who hasn’t been vet­ted in a ma­jor race be­fore, has already been tagged with a few nag­ging ques­tions about her back­ground.

And she still has to win her primary Tues­day against state Rep. Jason Con­ger, who has cri­ti­cized her for be­ing in­suf­fi­ciently con­ser­vat­ive, though We­hby leads him in all re­cent polling.

“I’m run­ning as who I am,” she says. “I didn’t de­cide I’m go­ing to be this type of Re­pub­lic­an or that type of Re­pub­lic­an.”¦ It’s im­port­ant that the Re­pub­lic­an Party stay united. With so many big is­sues fa­cing the coun­try, we need to make sure the fisc­al is­sues are para­mount. We can’t ever win if we keep fight­ing among ourselves.”

“It hasn’t been an easy de­cision be­cause I do very much love what I do,” We­hby said of the ca­reer change. A sup­port­er of term lim­its, she plans to leave the Sen­ate in 12 years if elec­ted. At that point, medi­cine will have changed and We­hby’s tech­nic­al skills will be out of prac­tice, mak­ing a re­turn to the op­er­at­ing room ex­tremely dif­fi­cult.

Her lack of polit­ic­al ex­per­i­ence has been both a bless­ing and a curse. Though she’s served on the board of trust­ees at the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation and spent plenty of time in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., loc­al pa­pers have called We­hby less than well-versed on a vari­ety of polit­ic­al is­sues. She also has the press dig­ging through her past. Politico re­por­ted Fri­day that she was once ac­cused of stalk­ing by her ex-boy­friend in 2013. We­hby said she wasn’t aware the man had ever filed a po­lice re­port, and both parties agreed the re­la­tion­ship was friendly now. (He is fin­an­cing at­tack ads against Con­ger, her Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent.)

We­hby’s med­ic­al work is also un­der scru­tiny, for a law­suit in­volving a moth­er who al­legedly had We­hby per­form un­ne­ces­sary med­ic­al pro­ced­ures on her chil­dren.

“People would al­ways ask me be­fore I ran, ‘Do you have any skel­et­ons in your closet? Be­cause if you do it’ll cer­tainly come out if you ran,’ ” We­hby said. “I found out that it doesn’t mat­ter if you have any skel­et­on in your closet, be­cause they just make things up.”

“I’m fas­cin­ated by the way people are just totally un­en­cumbered by the truth,” she ad­ded. “But I’m learn­ing to de­vel­op a thick skin.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×