Greenpeace Leader Moving On at 38

Phil Radford has been the youngest executive director in the environmental group’s 43-year history, but he’s looking for even greener pastures.

National Journal
Mike Magner
April 22, 2014, 8 a.m.

Phil Rad­ford‘s first day as ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Green­peace USA in 2009 ended with his ar­rest at a protest out­side the State De­part­ment. It seemed a fit­ting start for the head of an en­vir­on­ment­al group known for its con­front­a­tion­al tac­tics since 1971, when act­iv­ists leased a fish­ing ves­sel they re­named Green­peace and tried to enter a U.S. nuc­le­ar test­ing zone off the coast of Alaska.

Five years after he star­ted, at the ripe young age of 38, Rad­ford is step­ping down as Green­peace’s U.S. lead­er after broad­en­ing the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s mis­sion to in­clude more grass­roots act­iv­ism that has pres­sured dozens of glob­al cor­por­a­tions to light­en their eco­lo­gic­al foot­print.

“What we’ve done is in­crease our im­pact,” Rad­ford said. “I con­sider dir­ect ac­tion one of many tools. The real an­swer to what we’ve done is, we’ve changed over 100 com­pan­ies and their prac­tices.”

Rad­ford star­ted work­ing on en­vir­on­ment­al is­sues as a high school stu­dent in Oak Park, Ill., when a ma­jor waste-dis­pos­al com­pany was plan­ning to build an in­cin­er­at­or on Chica­go’s West Side, not far from his home. The son of two edu­cat­ors and the grand­son of a bot­an­ist, Rad­ford had a love of nature and the en­vir­on­ment in­stilled in him at an early age, “but I really got the bug fight­ing the in­cin­er­at­or,” he said.

The loc­al protests brought a halt to the in­cin­er­at­or, and Rad­ford moved on to oth­er is­sues work­ing for the Pub­lic In­terest Re­search Groups while study­ing polit­ic­al sci­ence and busi­ness at Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity in St. Louis. He later helped or­gan­ize Green Corps, a non­profit fo­cused on grass­roots or­gan­iz­ing, and the group was hired as a con­tract­or for Ozone Ac­tion, which prod­ded politi­cians to ad­dress cli­mate change and pro­tect the Earth’s ozone lay­er.

The group tar­geted the Glob­al Cli­mate Co­ali­tion, a front group for ma­jor in­dus­tries seek­ing to ward off ac­tion on glob­al warm­ing. “We de­cided to run di­vestit­ure cam­paigns against them,” Rad­ford said. “We took a page out of the an­tiapartheid book.” One by one, com­pan­ies like Ford and Gen­er­al Mo­tors left the co­ali­tion, and it was dis­mantled in 2002.

Around that time, Rad­ford foun­ded Power Shift, a group ad­voc­at­ing for clean en­ergy, and, among oth­er ac­com­plish­ments, it per­suaded Cit­ig­roup to al­low people to in­clude fin­an­cing for sol­ar power in their mort­gages. But after 9/11, found­a­tion grants star­ted to dry up, and Rad­ford joined Green­peace to help launch the group’s first “grass­roots de­part­ment.”

In early 2009, Rad­ford was named the young­est-ever ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or at Green­peace, and be­fore he even christened his new of­fice in Wash­ing­ton he made a de­tour to the State De­part­ment, where world lead­ers were meet­ing to dis­cuss an up­com­ing sum­mit on glob­al warm­ing.

“The Obama White House was drag­ging its feet on cli­mate change,” Rad­ford said, and en­vir­on­ment­al­ists — bor­row­ing a phrase from the fin­an­cial crisis a year earli­er — wanted to re­mind the pres­id­ent and his peers that the plan­et was “too big to fail.” Rad­ford scaled a crane across from the State De­part­ment and hung a ban­ner with those words; he was ar­res­ted as soon as he came down.

More power­ful than any protests, though, have been Green­peace’s ac­tions tar­get­ing com­pan­ies like Asia Pulp and Pa­per, a massive com­pany that was al­most single-handedly wip­ing out the forests of In­doch­ina. “We got them to change by go­ing after their cus­tom­ers,” Rad­ford said. “We cut 80 per­cent of their mar­ket.” The eco­nom­ic pres­sure was so in­tense that APP an­nounced a new con­ser­va­tion policy last year aimed at pre­vent­ing de­for­est­a­tion.

Green­peace is mak­ing sim­il­ar ef­forts today to shift ma­jor util­it­ies away from fossil fuels and to­ward clean­er power sources, though Rad­ford ac­know­ledged that it’s not easy.

Still, Rad­ford is op­tim­ist­ic that mar­ket forces along with a con­cerned pub­lic will bring about changes in Amer­ica’s policies on cli­mate change. “We will move on glob­al warm­ing when the cost is cheap enough,” he said. “Coal plants are shut­ting down, and if gas ex­ports are al­lowed we’ll see the price of gas go up, too. You will start to see stran­ded as­sets, price spikes.

“We need to change the grass­roots base on glob­al warm­ing,” he said, “and fo­cus on loc­al solu­tions.” Cit­ies like San Fran­cisco and Cin­cin­nati are already mov­ing to­ward clean­er en­ergy, and col­lege cam­puses across the coun­try are clean­ing up their acts be­cause of pres­sure from stu­dents, Rad­ford said. “The solu­tion is clean en­ergy, which pro­duces more jobs and few­er tox­ins,” he said.

As for what’s next for him, Rad­ford isn’t sure yet. But it’s a safe bet that some type of en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ism will be in­volved.

What We're Following See More »
SHARES THEIR LOVE STORY
Bill Clinton Gets Personal in Convention Speech
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."

LOUD “BLACK LIVES MATTER” CHANTS RING OUT
Mothers Of The Movement Endorse Hillary Clinton
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."

SOUTH DAKOTA GIVES HER CLINCHING DELEGATES
Clinton Officially Democratic Nominee for President
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many People Protested in Philly Yesterday?
11 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."

Source:
NO BATTLEGROUND STATES LEAN TRUMP
NY Times’ Upshot Gives Clinton 68% Chance to Win
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

Only a day after FiveThirtyEight's Now Cast gave Donald Trump a 57% chance of winning, the New York Times' Upshot fires back with its own analysis that shows Hillary Clinton with a 68% chance to be the next president. Its model "calculates win probabilities for each state," which incorporate recent polls plus "a state's past election results and national polling." Notably, all of the battleground states that "vote like the country as a whole" either lean toward Clinton or are toss-ups. None lean toward Trump.

Source:
×