Greenpeace Leader Moving On at 38

Phil Radford has been the youngest executive director in the environmental group’s 43-year history, but he’s looking for even greener pastures.

National Journal
Mike Magner
April 22, 2014, 8 a.m.

Phil Rad­ford‘s first day as ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Green­peace USA in 2009 ended with his ar­rest at a protest out­side the State De­part­ment. It seemed a fit­ting start for the head of an en­vir­on­ment­al group known for its con­front­a­tion­al tac­tics since 1971, when act­iv­ists leased a fish­ing ves­sel they re­named Green­peace and tried to enter a U.S. nuc­le­ar test­ing zone off the coast of Alaska.

Five years after he star­ted, at the ripe young age of 38, Rad­ford is step­ping down as Green­peace’s U.S. lead­er after broad­en­ing the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s mis­sion to in­clude more grass­roots act­iv­ism that has pres­sured dozens of glob­al cor­por­a­tions to light­en their eco­lo­gic­al foot­print.

“What we’ve done is in­crease our im­pact,” Rad­ford said. “I con­sider dir­ect ac­tion one of many tools. The real an­swer to what we’ve done is, we’ve changed over 100 com­pan­ies and their prac­tices.”

Rad­ford star­ted work­ing on en­vir­on­ment­al is­sues as a high school stu­dent in Oak Park, Ill., when a ma­jor waste-dis­pos­al com­pany was plan­ning to build an in­cin­er­at­or on Chica­go’s West Side, not far from his home. The son of two edu­cat­ors and the grand­son of a bot­an­ist, Rad­ford had a love of nature and the en­vir­on­ment in­stilled in him at an early age, “but I really got the bug fight­ing the in­cin­er­at­or,” he said.

The loc­al protests brought a halt to the in­cin­er­at­or, and Rad­ford moved on to oth­er is­sues work­ing for the Pub­lic In­terest Re­search Groups while study­ing polit­ic­al sci­ence and busi­ness at Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity in St. Louis. He later helped or­gan­ize Green Corps, a non­profit fo­cused on grass­roots or­gan­iz­ing, and the group was hired as a con­tract­or for Ozone Ac­tion, which prod­ded politi­cians to ad­dress cli­mate change and pro­tect the Earth’s ozone lay­er.

The group tar­geted the Glob­al Cli­mate Co­ali­tion, a front group for ma­jor in­dus­tries seek­ing to ward off ac­tion on glob­al warm­ing. “We de­cided to run di­vestit­ure cam­paigns against them,” Rad­ford said. “We took a page out of the an­tiapartheid book.” One by one, com­pan­ies like Ford and Gen­er­al Mo­tors left the co­ali­tion, and it was dis­mantled in 2002.

Around that time, Rad­ford foun­ded Power Shift, a group ad­voc­at­ing for clean en­ergy, and, among oth­er ac­com­plish­ments, it per­suaded Cit­ig­roup to al­low people to in­clude fin­an­cing for sol­ar power in their mort­gages. But after 9/11, found­a­tion grants star­ted to dry up, and Rad­ford joined Green­peace to help launch the group’s first “grass­roots de­part­ment.”

In early 2009, Rad­ford was named the young­est-ever ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or at Green­peace, and be­fore he even christened his new of­fice in Wash­ing­ton he made a de­tour to the State De­part­ment, where world lead­ers were meet­ing to dis­cuss an up­com­ing sum­mit on glob­al warm­ing.

“The Obama White House was drag­ging its feet on cli­mate change,” Rad­ford said, and en­vir­on­ment­al­ists — bor­row­ing a phrase from the fin­an­cial crisis a year earli­er — wanted to re­mind the pres­id­ent and his peers that the plan­et was “too big to fail.” Rad­ford scaled a crane across from the State De­part­ment and hung a ban­ner with those words; he was ar­res­ted as soon as he came down.

More power­ful than any protests, though, have been Green­peace’s ac­tions tar­get­ing com­pan­ies like Asia Pulp and Pa­per, a massive com­pany that was al­most single-handedly wip­ing out the forests of In­doch­ina. “We got them to change by go­ing after their cus­tom­ers,” Rad­ford said. “We cut 80 per­cent of their mar­ket.” The eco­nom­ic pres­sure was so in­tense that APP an­nounced a new con­ser­va­tion policy last year aimed at pre­vent­ing de­for­est­a­tion.

Green­peace is mak­ing sim­il­ar ef­forts today to shift ma­jor util­it­ies away from fossil fuels and to­ward clean­er power sources, though Rad­ford ac­know­ledged that it’s not easy.

Still, Rad­ford is op­tim­ist­ic that mar­ket forces along with a con­cerned pub­lic will bring about changes in Amer­ica’s policies on cli­mate change. “We will move on glob­al warm­ing when the cost is cheap enough,” he said. “Coal plants are shut­ting down, and if gas ex­ports are al­lowed we’ll see the price of gas go up, too. You will start to see stran­ded as­sets, price spikes.

“We need to change the grass­roots base on glob­al warm­ing,” he said, “and fo­cus on loc­al solu­tions.” Cit­ies like San Fran­cisco and Cin­cin­nati are already mov­ing to­ward clean­er en­ergy, and col­lege cam­puses across the coun­try are clean­ing up their acts be­cause of pres­sure from stu­dents, Rad­ford said. “The solu­tion is clean en­ergy, which pro­duces more jobs and few­er tox­ins,” he said.

As for what’s next for him, Rad­ford isn’t sure yet. But it’s a safe bet that some type of en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ism will be in­volved.

What We're Following See More »
CYBER THREATS INCREASING
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

Source:
CLYBURN WEIGHING HIS OWN NOD
CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.”

Source:
×