Obama Tries Again in Asia, but Ukraine May Dominate

Stymied on multiple occasions in recent years, the president hopes to reassure Asian nations personally this week.

National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
April 21, 2014, 4:03 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama nev­er seems to get Asia trips to go the way they are planned.

As he be­gins an am­bi­tious weeklong vis­it to four Asi­an coun­tries, the White House is hop­ing this one sticks to the agenda, which in­cludes eco­nom­ic, trade, and se­cur­ity meas­ures to demon­strate that his much-talked-about “pivot” to the Pa­cific is pay­ing off. But the ad­min­is­tra­tion knows that re­gion­al ten­sions and in­stabil­ity in Ukraine are cer­tain to force their way in­to the talks he will hold with oth­er lead­ers — and just may steal the spot­light.

Be­fore fly­ing to Ja­pan, the pres­id­ent on Tues­day will stop in Oso, Wash., the town about 50 miles north­east of Seattle where 41 were killed and two dozen homes were des­troyed in a dev­ast­at­ing mud­slide March 22. From there, he will go to Tokyo, then to South Korea on Fri­day, Malay­sia on Sat­urday, and the Phil­ip­pines on Monday.

Second only to end­ing the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan, the pivot to Asia has been one of the sig­nal for­eign policy changes Obama has im­ple­men­ted as pres­id­ent. But his ef­forts to per­son­ally cham­pi­on that policy over­seas have of­ten been sty­mied.

In 2009, Chinese of­fi­cials hi­jacked an Obama town-hall meet­ing in Shang­hai, pack­ing it with com­mun­ist sup­port­ers. In 2010, two planned trips to In­done­sia were can­celed be­cause of the health care de­bate and the Gulf oil spill. When he did make it to In­done­sia that year, he had to cut the trip short be­cause vol­can­ic ash threatened to ground Air Force One. Then, last Oc­to­ber, the pres­id­ent had to can­cel plans to at­tend two re­gion­al sum­mits be­cause of the gov­ern­ment shut­down at home.

At the time, the can­cel­la­tion raised ques­tions about the depth of the Obama’s com­mit­ment to the re­gion that is lead­ing the world in eco­nom­ic growth. It also offered an open­ing for China to fill in re­gion­al lead­er­ship.

This week, Obama gets to try again. But this trip takes place against a back­drop of Rus­si­an pro­voca­tions in Ukraine that have raised ques­tions about the U.S. re­solve to come to the aid of threatened al­lies. That, said Mi­chael J. Green at the Cen­ter for Stra­tegic and In­ter­na­tion­al Stud­ies, is “the bad news for the pres­id­ent.” Green, who was dir­ect­or for Asi­an Af­fairs at the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil for much of George W. Bush’s pres­id­ency, said there “are ques­tions in the re­gion … par­tic­u­larly among al­lies, about Amer­ic­an stay­ing power and the cred­ib­il­ity of Amer­ic­an com­mit­ments.”

Green said Ukraine has ex­acer­bated the situ­ation, but the ques­tions first were raised after the pres­id­ent failed to re­spond force­fully to Syr­ia’s use of chem­ic­al weapons. Obama’s re­sponse to Syr­ia, he said, “really rattled” Asi­an lead­ers deal­ing with Obama.

But Jef­frey A. Bader, who was seni­or dir­ect­or for East Asi­an Af­fairs on the NSC in Obama’s first term, be­lieves the fears about U.S. cred­ib­il­ity will prove un­foun­ded on the trip, call­ing it “fun­da­ment­ally false” that Ja­pan or oth­er U.S. al­lies “are nervous about the U.S. re­ac­tion to Ukraine.” Bader said the pres­id­ent will find Asi­an lead­ers even more wel­com­ing of a ro­bust Amer­ic­an se­cur­ity pres­ence in Asia be­cause of Ukraine.

In­deed, the word most heard de­scrib­ing Obama’s mis­sion on the trip is “re­as­sur­ance” — re­as­sur­ance that the United States will hon­or its treaty ob­lig­a­tions in the Pa­cific, re­as­sur­ance that the pres­id­ent is ser­i­ous about push­ing a ma­jor trade deal through a balky Con­gress, re­as­sur­ance that the pivot to Asia is more than rhet­or­ic­al, and re­as­sur­ance that Amer­ic­an policy to­ward China is prop­erly bal­anced. Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Susan Rice called the trip “an im­port­ant op­por­tun­ity to un­der­score our con­tin­ued fo­cus on the Asia-Pa­cific re­gion.”

Meet­ing with re­port­ers at the White House, Rice stressed the reas­ons for the pivot, not­ing that “over the next five years, nearly half of all growth out­side the United States is ex­pec­ted to come from Asia.” She said Obama sees “a sig­ni­fic­ant de­mand for U.S. lead­er­ship in that re­gion.”

But Rice also ac­know­ledged that Ukraine will have an im­pact on the agenda. “The coun­tries of the re­gion clearly are watch­ing this care­fully and are cog­niz­ant of the im­plic­a­tions for the lar­ger in­ter­na­tion­al or­der,” she said.

As al­ways, the growth and in­flu­ence of China hov­ers over the trip, even though the pres­id­ent will not be stop­ping there. Ken­neth G. Lieber­th­al, seni­or dir­ect­or for Asia on Bill Clin­ton’s NSC, said that “a ma­jor un­der­ly­ing is­sue throughout the trip” will be “wheth­er the pres­id­ent can strike the right bal­ance between provid­ing con­fid­ence that the U.S. will meet its se­cur­ity com­mit­ment without be­ing drawn in­to lan­guage and prom­ises that will tilt to­ward mak­ing China the bulls-eye.” That will re­quire some dip­lo­mat­ic fin­esse when the oth­er lead­ers bring up their dis­putes with China over is­lands and ter­rit­ori­al bor­ders in both the South China Sea and the East China Sea. And it will re­quire the pres­id­ent to care­fully de­fend his pivot without it com­ing across to Beijing as a strategy to “con­tain” China.

An­oth­er chal­lenge for the pres­id­ent is find­ing a way to achieve pro­gress on the 12-coun­try Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship trade talks, which are cur­rently stalled. Talks in Tokyo re­sume Tues­day in a last-minute ef­fort to break a stale­mate over mar­ket ac­cess. Wash­ing­ton is press­ing hard for the slash­ing of Ja­pan­ese tar­iffs that ef­fect­ively keep Amer­ic­an beef and pork out of the Ja­pan­ese mar­ket and Tokyo is push­ing for easi­er ac­cess to the Amer­ic­an mar­ket for Ja­pan­ese autos.

“Bet­ting is against any break­through,” Green warned, in part be­cause the Asi­an lead­ers are well aware that the pres­id­ent is un­able to de­liv­er his own party in Con­gress to sup­port a trade deal, even if it is achieved. “The Ja­pan­ese side ar­gues that the pres­id­ent’s not will­ing to make the case for trade pro­mo­tion au­thor­ity or fast track, so why should Ja­pan take a hit and do all of the hard polit­ics?”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×