When Does It Make Sense to Make Voters Mad?

Democrats are giving Republicans a run for their money in practicing the politics of grievance.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 03: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a stop of the 'Give America a Raise' bus tour at the U.S. Capitol Building on April 3, 2014 in Washington, DC. Lawmakers and low-wage workers spoke about the challenge of living on minimum wage and the potential economy-wide benefits of an increase of the Federal Minimum Wage to $10.10. (Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick/Getty Images)
National Journal
James Oliphant
April 15, 2014, 3:03 p.m.

For dec­ades, Re­pub­lic­ans have been the un­dis­puted mas­ters of what might be called the polit­ics of griev­ance, the sow­ing of dis­har­mony among the elect­or­ate in or­der to drive turnout. Think of Nix­on’s Si­lent Ma­jor­ity. Or the Re­agan Demo­crat. Or, more re­cently, the cease­less fear-mon­ger­ing over Obama­care.

But Demo­crats, in­creas­ingly, have re­sor­ted to sim­il­ar tac­tics. And this year, faced with a dif­fi­cult midterm map, they’ve fash­ioned a strategy built around stok­ing the fires of re­sent­ment among base voters in a bid to make them care about Novem­ber’s elec­tions.

With that strategy comes some risk of over­heat­ing. Take the fur­or over House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s com­ments last week that op­pos­i­tion to im­mig­ra­tion re­form was steeped, in part, in ra­cism. And then Rep. Steve Is­rael, the man charged with help­ing Demo­crats get elec­ted to the House, piled on over the week­end, say­ing that, “to a sig­ni­fic­ant ex­tent, the Re­pub­lic­an base does have ele­ments that are an­im­ated by ra­cism.”

His re­marks came after a week of Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id ac­cus­ing Re­pub­lic­ans on a daily basis of en­dors­ing pay­ing wo­men less than men, be­cause a bill spe­cific­ally tailored to al­low Demo­crats to use the is­sue as a cudgel did what it was de­signed to do: fail on the floor. The White House hasn’t shied away from em­bra­cing the strategy, either. Last week, it hos­ted a care­fully timed “Equal Pay Day.” It’s done the same for is­sues such as in­creas­ing the min­im­um wage and ex­tend­ing un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance.

Demo­crats struck a sim­il­ar note in 2012, of course, with the cries about a “war on wo­men.” But the midterms present a great­er mes­saging chal­lenge. Last month, Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Stan Green­berg soun­ded a red alert when his sur­veys sug­ges­ted that the core of the so-called rising Amer­ic­an elect­or­ate, the one that pro­pelled Barack Obama to two terms as pres­id­ent, wasn’t plan­ning to show up in 2014.

That has forced the party to find reas­ons for people to come out and vote, and they’ve se­lec­ted is­sues that tar­get slices of the elect­or­ate. Hence, equal pay, an is­sue that es­pe­cially res­on­ates with single wo­men; the min­im­um wage, which may an­im­ate minor­ity voters; and im­mig­ra­tion re­form, which gal­van­izes His­pan­ics. And likely com­ing soon to a Re­id press avail­ab­il­ity near you: stu­dent-loan modi­fic­a­tion, teed up for the hard-to-get youth vote.

At the same time, Re­id’s re­lent­less ham­mer­ing of the Koch broth­ers has been, viewed from a dis­tance, less about the in­flu­ence of money in polit­ics and more about the no­tion that the rich are prosper­ing while the less for­tu­nate struggle. It’s what Demo­crats did so suc­cess­fully two years ago in ty­ing Mitt Rom­ney to Bain Cap­it­al. All of it has been wrapped in a cam­paign Demo­crats say is aimed at en­sur­ing “a fair shot for every­one,” dir­ectly aimed at dis­af­fected voters who be­lieve they’re on the short end. And it may help ex­plain why Pelosi and Is­rael were so com­fort­able as­sert­ing that parts of the Demo­crat­ic base are vic­tims of ra­cism.

Nev­er­the­less, Demo­crats re­main hobbled by the lack of a large, uni­fy­ing mes­sage, es­pe­cially with one of their own in the White House and the eco­nomy still strug­gling. There’s noth­ing to rally the base en masse like George W. Bush and the Ir­aq War did in 2006, and noth­ing that mo­tiv­ates large swaths of their voters like op­pos­i­tion to the Af­ford­able Care Act does for con­ser­vat­ives.

Mi­chael Mc­Don­ald, an ex­pert on voter turnout at George Ma­son Uni­versity, is du­bi­ous that the Demo­crats’ is­sue-tar­get­ing ef­fort will spark a dif­fer­ent mix of midterm voters. “They’re ba­sic­ally try­ing to reen­gin­eer the elect­or­ate,” Mc­Don­ald said. “His­tory is not on their side.” The poor Demo­crat­ic turnout in a Flor­ida swing dis­trict spe­cial elec­tion last month only seemed to re­af­firm that.

But there is a sliv­er of hope for the party, one that was backed up by Green­berg’s re­search. There is some evid­ence, Mc­Don­ald said, that eco­nom­ic is­sues such as the min­im­um wage could con­vince low-in­come voters who would oth­er­wise stay home to vote. Moreover, the mes­saging out of Cap­it­ol Hill is be­ing aug­men­ted by a ground-based get-out-the-vote op­er­a­tion, spear­headed by the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, that is modeled on the Obama turnout ma­chine.

Mor­gan Jack­son, a Demo­crat­ic strategist in North Car­o­lina, be­lieves the niche ap­proach could work, that a por­tion of the elect­or­ate in his state feels vic­tim­ized by the GOP both na­tion­ally and loc­ally. (The state Le­gis­lature has passed, among oth­er things, a voter-ID law.) “I think here it has some strength. There’s real en­ergy on the ground,” he said. “You’ve got this feel­ing among the Demo­crat­ic base that they’re be­ing gone after.”

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­ans have been eager to paint the Demo­crat­ic plan as noth­ing but elec­tion-year theat­er. “Their gov­ern­ing agenda is ac­tu­ally a polit­ic­al doc­u­ment draf­ted by the cam­paign staff,” Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell groused on the Sen­ate floor last week.

But un­like in 2010, there has been a great­er ef­fort this cycle to try and com­pete for the demo­graph­ic that com­prises the Obama co­ali­tion, es­pe­cially wo­men. It was ap­par­ent last week in the dis­pute over the Paycheck Fair­ness Act, when Re­pub­lic­ans talked about their own ef­forts to help wo­men in the work­place. In Michigan, Terri Lynn Land, con­sidered a strong con­tender to wrest Carl Lev­in’s seat from Demo­crats, waded in­to the equal-pay de­bate by ar­guing for work­place flex­ib­il­ity. The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee this week launched a pro­gram called “14 in ‘14” which is aimed at en­ga­ging and mo­bil­iz­ing wo­men in the 21-to-40 demo­graph­ic ahead of Novem­ber.

“We have to be more ag­gress­ive in talk­ing to wo­men. We have to ask for their vote,” said RNC spokes­wo­man Kirsten Kukowski. “It’s not something that we’ve been do­ing the last couple of cycles.”

The new ap­proach was also evid­ent in re­marks made by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a po­ten­tial 2016 con­tender for the GOP nom­in­a­tion, last week­end at a New Hamp­shire polit­ic­al event. Cruz talked about “vic­tims” of the Obama eco­nomy in terms that soun­ded ripped from the Obama cam­paign play­book — with a little Harry Re­id Koch-bait­ing mixed in.

“It’s young people. It’s His­pan­ics. It’s Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans. It’s single moms,” Cruz said. “The rich and power­ful, those who walk the cor­ridors of power, are get­ting fat and happy un­der the Obama eco­nom­ic agenda.”

Cruz’s re­marks made clear that both sides be­lieve there are swaths of the elect­or­ate hold­ing griev­ances against Wash­ing­ton. The midterms may well be de­cided by which side can best ex­ploit them.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×