A Kentucky political fight over a state law that governs electoral ballots is emerging as an early test for Sen. Rand Paul should he decide to run for president in 2016.
Kentucky’s junior senator recently won straw polls in New Hampshire and at CPAC, and it’s no secret he is weighing a campaign for the White House. There’s just one problem: Kentucky law prohibits candidates from appearing twice on the ballot, a potential obstacle if you’re running for Senate and president.
That’s where Paul’s GOP allies come in. Damon Thayer, majority leader of the Kentucky Senate, is shepherding a bill through the Legislature that would solve the problem, and last week Mitch McConnell, minority leader in the U.S. Senate and Kentucky’s senior senator, said he supports the effort.
State Sen. Joe Bowen, who chairs the committee that handled the bill, says Kentucky Republicans have been discussing the measure since before the current legislative session began earlier this year. For them, it accomplishes two things: It helps an influential political figure, and it raises the state’s profile. They say it’s no different from Rep. Paul Ryan running for his House seat and the vice presidency in 2012 or Joe Biden running for his Senate seat in Delaware and the vice presidency in 2008.
“We’re motivated to allow him to run for both offices,” Bowen said. “My interest is, one, he’d make an excellent president, and two it’d be good for the commonwealth of Kentucky.”
Paul’s camp casts the state Senate bill as a kind of insurance policy and insists that the Kentucky law pertains only to state offices and not their federal counterparts.
“We are not seeking to change the law, but rather to clarify that the Kentucky statute does not apply to federal elections,” RAND PAC Executive Director Doug Stafford said in a statement. “Federal law governs federal elections, and the Supreme Court has made it clear that states cannot impose additional qualifications beyond those in the Constitution.”
That’s an argument that Paul might have to press in court because the state House and governorship in Kentucky are controlled by Democrats, and neither shows any sign of supporting the Senate bill, which Bowen said he expects will pass the upper chamber before the end of the session.
Republicans argue Democrats should back the measure because it could one day help them. They cast the bill as nonpartisan.
“There are some naysayers,” Bowen said. “There are some naysayers on apple pie.”
But Kentucky Democrats aren’t about to change their minds. Democratic House Speaker Greg Stumbo has shot the idea down.
“If you’re gonna run, you oughta make up your mind and run for one office and one office only,” Stumbo said last month.
Still, Republicans are taking some heart. The proposal won the support of Democratic state Sen. Morgan McGarvey, which encouraged Bowen. He blames some of the opposition on end-of-session tension.
“Nerves are frayed,” he said. “We’re winding down. Maybe they have a change of heart. Talk is cheap.”
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”