Who Scares Democrats More Than the Koch Brothers? Nate Silver.

Fear is a tool when it comes to fundraising, and Silver’s analysis seems to work.

National Journal
Scott Bland
March 11, 2014, 5:29 p.m.

For the last few months, Fiv­eThirtyEight ed­it­or-in-chief Nate Sil­ver has been largely ab­sent from the polit­ic­al fore­cast­ing scene he owned in the 2008 and 2012 pres­id­en­tial elec­tions.

But that hasn’t stopped the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee from send­ing at least 11 fun­drais­ing emails fea­tur­ing Sil­ver in the sub­ject line over the past four months, even as Sil­ver was build­ing the found­a­tion for his new web­site that’s launch­ing Monday and was not writ­ing reg­u­larly.

It’s all part of a di­git­al fun­drais­ing game that will in­crease in in­tens­ity as the elec­tion draws near­er, as can­did­ates, polit­ic­al parties, and oth­er groups bom­bard their email lists with mes­sages de­signed to draw con­tri­bu­tions.

One of most widely used tools is fear. Many of the emails seek to con­vince sup­port­ers that the polit­ic­al situ­ation is dire enough that it re­quires ac­tion, and that’s where Sil­ver comes in.

The last time he wrote about the Sen­ate land­scape, all the way back in Ju­ly 2013, Sil­ver said Re­pub­lic­ans “might now be close to even-money to win con­trol of the cham­ber” in 2014. He also cited North Car­o­lina as “the closest thing to the tip­ping-point state in the Sen­ate battle,” and called Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mary Landrieu’s seat in Louisi­ana “a true toss-up.”

Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee emails fea­tur­ing Nate Sil­ver.

That’s scary stuff if you’re a Demo­crat­ic sup­port­er, es­pe­cially com­ing from an ana­lyst whose ac­cur­acy made him a house­hold name in the past few years. And the re­peated name-drop­ping has prob­ably opened some wal­lets for Sen­ate Demo­crats.

“There’s a lot of test­ing, par­tic­u­larly for sub­ject lines, to see what has the best open rates,” said Taryn Rosen­kranz, a Demo­crat­ic di­git­al fun­drais­ing con­sult­ant un­af­fili­ated with the DSCC. “Us­ing that name over and over sug­gests it’s suc­cess­ful, and people are open­ing and giv­ing.”

The DSCC de­clined a re­quest for com­ment.

In­deed, email fun­drais­ing is akin to a sci­ence in polit­ics, in which cam­paigns and party com­mit­tees test sub­ject lines, mes­saging, lay­outs, the time that email is sent, the num­ber of links, how many mes­sages are sent — any­thing to in­crease the amount of money col­lec­ted. Just a small per­cent­age in­crease can lead to big money when so­li­cit­ing a large list.

There are plenty of oth­er themes in the past few months of DSCC emails, in­clud­ing alarm­ing one-word sub­ject lines such as “cata­stroph­ic,” “dis­astrous,” and “doomed.” A few oth­er in­di­vidu­als (be­sides Sen­ate can­did­ates) have been fea­tured fre­quently, too. For ex­ample, one of the non­profits af­fil­i­ated with the con­ser­vat­ive bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers, Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, has already spent about $30 mil­lion on ad­vert­ising against Sen­ate Demo­crats, and the Kochs ap­pear prom­in­ently in email so­li­cit­a­tions.

The DSCC has ref­er­enced the Kochs to shake money out of donors in no few­er than 77 fun­drais­ing emails in the past four months. But Sil­ver has the con­ser­vat­ive money­men beat in one im­port­ant met­ric. Only one DSCC email in that time fea­tures the Kochs in the sub­ject line — per­haps the most crit­ic­al part of the mes­sage be­cause it must in­duce sup­port­ers to open the email be­fore they can ac­tu­ally give money. Sil­ver was cited far more of­ten.

Sil­ver rose to prom­in­ence by pro­ject­ing the 2008 elec­tion res­ults, and he then joined The New York Times, where he gained a big­ger plat­form and en­joyed an­oth­er suc­cess­ful year of polit­ic­al fore­cast­ing in 2012, cor­rectly pre­dict­ing the win­ner in all 50 states in the pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. He has since moved to ES­PN, where he is re­launch­ing Fiv­eThirtyEight as a quant­it­at­ive news site cov­er­ing not only polit­ics but also sports, eco­nom­ics, and oth­er sub­jects.

Rosen­kranz said she wasn’t aware of any oth­er Demo­crat­ic cam­paigns or com­mit­tees lever­aging Sil­ver’s renown in the same way as the DSCC. But with Sil­ver’s new site launch­ing on Monday, a new Sen­ate fore­cast may be in the near fu­ture — and per­haps more emails, too.

“He’s a trus­ted source of in­form­a­tion,” Rosen­kranz said. “People don’t have a lot of time to read email … so you’ve got to cap­ture their at­ten­tion in some way.”

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
SHARES THEIR LOVE STORY
Bill Clinton Gets Personal in Convention Speech
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."

LOUD “BLACK LIVES MATTER” CHANTS RING OUT
Mothers Of The Movement Endorse Hillary Clinton
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."

SOUTH DAKOTA GIVES HER CLINCHING DELEGATES
Clinton Officially Democratic Nominee for President
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many People Protested in Philly Yesterday?
12 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."

Source:
NO BATTLEGROUND STATES LEAN TRUMP
NY Times’ Upshot Gives Clinton 68% Chance to Win
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

Only a day after FiveThirtyEight's Now Cast gave Donald Trump a 57% chance of winning, the New York Times' Upshot fires back with its own analysis that shows Hillary Clinton with a 68% chance to be the next president. Its model "calculates win probabilities for each state," which incorporate recent polls plus "a state's past election results and national polling." Notably, all of the battleground states that "vote like the country as a whole" either lean toward Clinton or are toss-ups. None lean toward Trump.

Source:
×