President Obama is asking Congress for more money to implement Obamacare. Surely he knows Republicans won’t give it to him. And Republicans — just as surely — know that Obamacare will be implemented anyway, because the law contains ways for the administration to fund it with or without Congress’s help.
And around and around we go in the flat circle that is Obamacare politics.
It’s all a bit of political theater, but it has consequences on the ground: The phony fight over “defunding” the Affordable Care Act drove the government to shut down this fall — even though the vast majority of funding for the law was never at stake.
Tuesday, it began again, when the White House’s newly released budget proposal requested about $630 million to support federally run insurance exchanges — the centerpiece of the ACA.
The administration requested almost twice that amount last year, and the proposal was so thoroughly dead on arrival that Senate Democrats didn’t even try to pass the extra funding. They settled for beating back the equally futile effort led by Sen. Ted Cruz to “defund” the law. And after the shutdown was over and the histrionics were finished, the status quo remained largely intact.
This year promises to be little different.
So, the White House won’t get the $630 million it says it needs. And it could use the money: Because the ACA didn’t provide any direct funding for federally run insurance exchanges, the Health and Human Services Department has had to cobble together as much as it could, through a process that’s basically the federal government’s version of rummaging through the couch cushions for loose change.
But the administration has consistently found ways to work around congressional Republicans. Consider the latest request for additional funding: HHS is asking for $630 million, after seeking $1.5 billion last year. Why the drop?
It’s because the administration is now collecting user fees from the insurance companies that sell plans through Obamacare’s exchanges. Those fees will bring in around $1.2 billion next year, according to HHS’s budget documents.
The department added those revenues in with its request from Congress, creating a total funding shortfall that’s actually a little bit bigger than last year’s. But now insurers are providing the additional funding that Congress won’t.
And like so much of the law’s funding, it doesn’t require congressional approval. Short of repealing Obamacare, which is just as unrealistic as funding it, there’s not much Republicans can do to cut off these revenues.
This is why the government shutdown was so divisive even among Republicans. Shutting down the federal government did very little to stop the flow of money to implement the ACA, because most of Obamacare’s funding was provided in Obamacare itself — not through the regular appropriations process.
HHS has had to get creative to find money for the exchanges. It tapped pots of money from other parts of the law, sometimes angering Democratic allies. It drew down a $1 billion fund for general implementation work, and also tapped the law’s prevention and public health fund. Republicans did successfully cut that fund by $1 billion in the spending bill that reopened the government, preventing HHS from using it again to stand up the exchanges.
Some of the tricks and back doors HHS used to find extra cash are now exhausted or close to it, but insurers’ user fees are picking up most of the difference.
The department decided in 2012 that insurance plans would pay a fee of 3.5 percent of their premiums to help the federally run exchanges function. (States that run their own marketplaces can set their own fees, or choose not to charge one.) Revenue from the fees will go up along with enrollment.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."