Congressional Democrats Face Uphill Battle in Midterms

The party’s chances of holding onto a majority in the Senate are looking increasingly tenuous.

Residents wait in line to pick up a ballot during early voting at the Black Hawk County Courthouse on September 27, 2012 in Waterloo, Iowa.
National Journal
Charlie Cook
March 3, 2014, 5:29 p.m.

At this point, eight months be­fore the Nov. 4 elec­tion, it’s hard to see a lot of good news for con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats.

No mat­ter how you look at it, the House seems out of reach. Today, Re­pub­lic­ans ap­pear a bit more likely to gain than to lose seats; it would take a cata­clys­mic event for Demo­crats to score the net gain of the 17 seats they need to take the ma­jor­ity.

What’s changed is that Demo­crats’ chances of hold­ing onto their ma­jor­ity in the Sen­ate is look­ing in­creas­ingly tenu­ous. There are now at least 10, and po­ten­tially as many as 13, Demo­crat­ic-held seats in jeop­ardy. By con­trast, only two GOP seats are in any mean­ing­ful danger, and that num­ber hasn’t changed in six months.

Things are start­ing to look grisly for Sen­ate Demo­crats. Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ings av­er­age 41 per­cent, ba­sic­ally where Pres­id­ent George W. Bush’s poll num­bers were at this point be­fore his own dis­astrous 2006 second-term, midterm elec­tion. And the Af­ford­able Care Act, Obama’s sig­na­ture le­gis­lat­ive and policy achieve­ment, is now even more un­pop­u­lar than it was in Oc­to­ber and Novem­ber of 2010, when Demo­crats lost 63 seats, con­trol of the House, and a half-dozen Sen­ate seats. It doesn’t help that midterm elect­or­ates tend to be older and whiter than in pres­id­en­tial elec­tions. Obama’s cur­rent job-ap­prov­al rat­ings are also worse than they were in Oc­to­ber and Novem­ber of 2010.

The two most likely le­gis­lat­ive land mines for Re­pub­lic­ans to step on between now and Elec­tion Day have been de­fused: The gov­ern­ment is now fun­ded, and Con­gress won’t need to lift the debt ceil­ing between now and Novem­ber. As a res­ult, it is not clear where the kind of break that Demo­crats need could emerge.

The Sen­ate’s play­ing field keeps get­ting lar­ger and, at least so far, en­tirely at Demo­crats’ ex­pense. Three of their seats are, to put it char­it­ably, up­hill chal­lenges. The open seats in South Dakota and West Vir­gin­ia are pretty much gone. In Montana, it’s un­clear wheth­er newly ap­poin­ted Sen. John Walsh is in any bet­ter po­s­i­tion, apart from fun­drais­ing, than he was when he was just the lieu­ten­ant gov­ernor run­ning for an open seat. Between na­tion­al party com­mit­tees and su­per PACs, the amount of money raised by the can­did­ates and their cam­paigns means less than ever be­fore. With a hand­ful of people in each party ap­par­ently ready to spend $50 mil­lion to $100 mil­lion of their own money on be­half of their favored can­did­ates, a lot of things that used to be im­port­ant aren’t so much any­more.

Al­though it is get­ting sur­pris­ingly little at­ten­tion, Demo­crat Carl Lev­in’s open seat in Michigan is a toss-up; neither of the can­did­ates is par­tic­u­larly strong or well defined, but the nat­ur­al ad­vant­age that a Demo­crat in the Mo­tor State could be ex­pec­ted to have is likely off­set by ugly head­winds caused by ra­dio­act­ive Obama and ACA num­bers. The same can be said for Tom Har­kin’s open seat in Iowa. In both states, the pre­sumptive Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ees have Obama­care votes to de­fend, but the highly prob­lem­at­ic GOP nom­in­a­tion pro­cess in Iowa might well yield an exot­ic and un­elect­able con­tender.

Five Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents now face tough races, Arkan­sas’s Mark Pry­or is in the most chal­len­ging situ­ation, fol­lowed by Kay Hagan (North Car­o­lina), Mark Be­gich (Alaska), Mary Landrieu (Louisi­ana), and Mark Ud­all (Col­or­ado). Ud­all be­came the latest ad­di­tion to the list when GOP Rep. Cory Gard­ner an­nounced his can­did­acy Sat­urday. Also worth keep­ing a close eye on are Al Franken (Min­nesota); Jeanne Shaheen (New Hamp­shire), if former Sen. Scott Brown runs; and Mark Warner (Vir­gin­ia), who is as strong as a Demo­crat can be in that state but would be in trouble in the event of a melt­down. When there is a pres­id­ent with num­bers this bad, even in­cum­bents who might nor­mally be OK need to be watched care­fully, par­tic­u­larly if there is deeply un­pop­u­lar policy weigh­ing down the party’s can­did­ates.

Many sus­pect that the best — or even only — chance that Demo­crats have of sal­va­ging their ma­jor­ity is if they can pick off one or even two GOP-held seats. This would force Re­pub­lic­ans to gross sev­en or even eight seats to se­cure the six-seat net gain needed to win the ma­jor­ity. The Wash­ing­ton con­ven­tion­al wis­dom is that Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell will ul­ti­mately prove un­beat­able, but there are no data to sup­port that no­tion.

The polls have the Ken­tucky race dead even, and be­ing one of the most power­ful and vis­ible lead­ers in an in­sti­tu­tion with fa­vor­able rat­ings com­par­able to go­nor­rhea is no as­set in this day and age. Un­like Be­gich, Franken, Hagan, Landrieu, Pry­or, Shaheen, Ud­all, and Warner — or Reps. Bruce Bra­ley and Gary Peters, the likely Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ees in Iowa and Michigan — Mc­Con­nell’s chal­lenger, Ken­tucky Sec­ret­ary of State Al­is­on Lun­der­gan Grimes, did not vote for Obama­care and is more as­so­ci­ated with the Clin­tons than Obama. That doesn’t mean she wins, but she will be less saddled with the ACA than her coun­ter­parts in oth­er states. I’d put Ken­tucky at 50-50. The oth­er vul­ner­able GOP seat is in Geor­gia, where Saxby Cham­b­liss is re­tir­ing. The state leans Re­pub­lic­an, but an exot­ic GOP nom­in­ee could make things very in­ter­est­ing, and Michelle Nunn, the CEO of Points of Light and the daugh­ter of former Demo­crat­ic Sen. Sam Nunn, is prov­ing to be one of the party’s strongest re­cruits this cycle, and she is run­ning without a pa­per trail of votes.

It’s far too soon to say that Demo­crats’ Sen­ate ma­jor­ity is his­tory. In 2012, their situ­ation looked pretty grim at this junc­ture, too, but the GOP self-de­struc­ted and nom­in­ated the wrong people in a couple of states, and ended up los­ing three seats.

Still, at this point, it sure looks to be a very ugly year for Demo­crats on Cap­it­ol Hill.

What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
NO MORE INDEPENDENT VOTERS?
GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.

Source:
×