Why Sen. Al Franken Is Spending Millions

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11: U.S. Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) speaks during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee December 11, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The committee held the hearing on 'Continued Oversight of U.S. Government Surveillance Authorities.'
National Journal
Michael Catalini
See more stories about...
Michael Catalini
Feb. 24, 2014, 4:48 p.m.

A hand­ful of scary polit­ic­al pos­sib­il­it­ies worry Min­nesota Demo­crats. They fret that the base won’t turn out this year, that con­ser­vat­ive groups will blanket the state in neg­at­ive ads, and that the Af­ford­able Care Act will weigh down the tick­et.

But Sen. Al Franken is not tak­ing chances, pour­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in­to his reelec­tion cam­paign even though his seat is widely con­sidered safe and a for­mid­able Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent has yet to emerge.

On pa­per, Franken’s cam­paign has spent more than $15 mil­lion so far, mak­ing the Min­nesota race one of the most ex­pens­ive con­tests this cycle, ahead of closely watched cam­paigns in Arkan­sas, Ken­tucky, Louisi­ana, and North Car­o­lina, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics.

It’s also not sur­pris­ing, Demo­crats say, be­cause Franken won his first race in 2008 by just 312 votes, nar­rowly edging out former GOP Sen. Norm Cole­man even as Pres­id­ent Obama car­ried Min­nesota by 10 per­cent­age points. The re­count, which stretched in­to 2009, plus cam­paign debts, help ex­plain the $15 mil­lion. If those costs are factored out, spend­ing is closer to $7.5 mil­lion, Franken’s camp points out.

Even so, Franken is in for a high-spend­ing cam­paign, giv­en that the av­er­age win­ning Sen­ate ef­fort spent about $10.4 mil­lion in 2012, that Franken’s cam­paign still had al­most $5 mil­lion in the bank in Decem­ber and that the elec­tion is still more than half a year away.

The ex­penses are jus­ti­fied, Demo­crats say, to ward off Re­pub­lic­ans and pre­vent an­oth­er anxi­ety-in­du­cing re­count.

“Any­one who would sug­gest this race is over nine months early is fool­ing them­selves,” said Demo­crat­ic-Farm­er-Labor Party Chair­man Ken Mar­tin. “Even if you would say this isn’t a com­pet­it­ive race right now, they’re do­ing the things they need to do to keep it from be­com­ing a com­pet­it­ive race. That’s why you spend the money.”

Franken’s cam­paign stresses that it is spend­ing at such a high clip to send a sig­nal to con­ser­vat­ive out­side groups like Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, which is jab­bing Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bent Kay Hagan in North Car­o­lina.

“The best way to com­bat those at­tacks and keep Sen. Franken in the Sen­ate fight­ing for middle-class Min­nesotans is to in­vest early and build a strong grass­roots in­fra­struc­ture,” cam­paign spokes­wo­man Al­ex­an­dra Fetis­soff said in a state­ment.

A former Sat­urday Night Live writer, comedi­an, and au­thor, who re­cently held a fun­draiser with Jon Hamm of Mad Men fame in Min­neapol­is, Franken rakes in cash from both deep-pock­eted stars and small donors. His cam­paign touts the fact that 97 per­cent of his con­tri­bu­tions so far this year have been for $100 or less.

When it comes to spend­ing, Franken has laid out a great deal on fun­drais­ing it­self (it takes money to raise money). The pro­spect that the Demo­crat­ic base could stay home in Novem­ber means that Franken has also spent heav­ily on field op­er­a­tions and build­ing in­fra­struc­ture across the state, Mar­tin said.

If turnout is a worry, then former Demo­crat­ic Rep. Tim Penny of Min­nesota val­id­ates that con­cern. Penny, who served from 1983 to 1994, said he in­tends to stay out of the Sen­ate race, not be­cause he doesn’t like Franken, but be­cause of polit­ic­al fa­tigue.

“They’re spend­ing mega-mil­lions,” Penny said. “I’m just done with it. They’ll find their money some­where.”

By con­trast, Franken’s GOP op­pon­ents have raised and spent far less.

Busi­ness­man Mike Mc­Fad­den, who has the back­ing of sev­er­al es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans in­clud­ing Cole­man, raised roughly $1.5 mil­lion and spent about $541,000 so far this cycle. State Sen. Ju­li­anne Ort­man, who re­cently won a party straw poll, has raised more than a quarter of a mil­lion dol­lars and spent about $117,000.

Rather than shoot­ing at each oth­er, both Re­pub­lic­ans have taken aim at Franken.

“If that much has been spent in this race, it’s been spent in­ef­fect­ively,” Ort­man said. Ad­ded Mc­Fad­den spokes­man Tom Er­ick­son: “Money doesn’t win elec­tions. Ideas do. … Ideas are what’s gonna mat­ter most in this race.”

Like their na­tion­al coun­ter­parts, Min­nesota Re­pub­lic­ans are fo­cus­ing their at­tacks on Obama­care. With Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing hov­er­ing in the mid-40s in blue Min­nesota ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Star Tribune poll, it’s un­clear wheth­er Franken will ap­pear with the pres­id­ent when he’s in Min­nesota this week.

What is less murky, though, is that Franken isn’t leav­ing much to chance this time around.

“His spend­ing pat­terns re­flect the fact that na­tion­al races are volat­ile these days,” said former Demo­crat­ic state le­gis­lat­or Matt En­tenza. “I think the fact that he’s spend­ing this kind of money is like buy­ing in­sur­ance.”

CLA­RI­FIC­A­TION: A story Tues­day re­por­ted that Sen. Al Franken’s cam­paign has spent more than $15 mil­lion on his reelec­tion ef­fort. In­form­a­tion provided by the cam­paign after the story was pub­lished in­dic­ates that about $7.5 mil­lion was spent on reelec­tion, with the re­mainder spent on the re­count in his last elec­tion and to re­tire cam­paign debt.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×