Poll: It’s Time to Normalize Relations With Cuba

A bike-taxi and a vintage American car are seen in front of a building decorated with a large Cuban flag, on December 31, 2013, in Havana. A new regulation released by Cuban President Raul Castro will allow Cubans or foreign residents to freely buy new or used cars in government-run stores as of January 3, 2014; after 50 years of automobile sales regulations. 
National Journal
Charlie Cook
Feb. 24, 2014, 5 p.m.

Every once in a while, a polit­ic­al ca­nard is ex­posed — something that once may have been gen­er­ally ac­cep­ted and per­haps true, but has re­mained a part of the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom.

Such is the case with the view that any kind of nor­mal­iz­a­tion of re­la­tions with Cuba is a polit­ic­al third rail; that is to say, if you touch it, you die (or get de­feated). In the Cold War era, par­tic­u­larly in the 1960s, nor­mal­iz­a­tion of re­la­tions with Cuba was a non­starter, and in fact, it was dan­ger­ous for most politi­cians to sup­port.

But that day has long since passed. In all but pos­sibly a hand­ful of con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts in Flor­ida and New Jer­sey — if even there — this is a noth­ing-bur­ger is­sue. Few voters would have any prob­lem with it. Like the mis­sile silos in North Dakota, our policy to­ward Cuba is a Cold War rel­ic that has long since passed its time.

A new bi­par­tis­an na­tion­al sur­vey points to strong and broad-based sup­port for a ma­jor change in U.S. policy to­ward Cuba, even among Re­pub­lic­ans.

In­deed, Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers rep­res­ent­ing farm states have a par­tic­u­lar in­cent­ive to sup­port le­gis­la­tion that would cre­ate a new mar­ket for U.S. goods, par­tic­u­larly corn and grain, just 90 miles off the coast of Flor­ida.

Com­mis­sioned by the At­lantic Coun­cil, a highly re­spec­ted for­eign policy think tank, and its Ad­rienne Arsht Lat­in Amer­ica Cen­ter, the poll was con­duc­ted Jan. 7-22, in Eng­lish and Span­ish, among 1,024 adults na­tion­wide. The sur­vey also in­cluded an over-sample of 617 Flor­idi­ans, so that their at­ti­tudes could be giv­en par­tic­u­lar fo­cus, and had a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points na­tion­ally and 4.0 points for the Flor­ida group. The sur­vey was con­duc­ted jointly by Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster Glen Bol­ger of Pub­lic Opin­ion Strategies and Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Paul Maslin of Fairb­ank, Maslin, Maul­lin, Metz, & As­so­ci­ates. Both are among the best poll­sters in the coun­try.

Na­tion­ally, 56 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans sup­port either nor­mal­iz­ing re­la­tions or en­ga­ging more dir­ectly with Cuba; just 35 per­cent are op­posed. Sup­port for a policy change is also re­flec­ted in the num­bers of people who feel most in­tensely about the is­sue, with 30 per­cent of the over­all sample strongly fa­vor­ing such a change and 26 per­cent some­what in fa­vor, while 22 per­cent strongly op­pose and an­oth­er 13 per­cent some­what op­pose this. Nine per­cent have no opin­ion. Among Demo­crats and in­de­pend­ents, 60 per­cent fa­vor chan­ging re­la­tions; 31 per­cent of Demo­crats and 30 per­cent of in­de­pend­ents are op­posed. Even among Re­pub­lic­ans, 52 per­cent fa­vor a change in policy, with 41 per­cent in op­pos­i­tion.

In Flor­ida, the state with the most Cuban-Amer­ic­ans and the one geo­graph­ic­ally closest and most likely to fol­low and be af­fected by U.S.-Cuba re­la­tions, 63 per­cent fa­vor a change — 7 points more than the na­tion­al sup­port level. Only 30 per­cent op­pose a change, 5 points few­er than the na­tion­al op­pos­i­tion. So much for the idea that a pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate fa­vor­ing nor­mal­iz­a­tion would lose any chance of car­ry­ing Flor­ida.

Among His­pan­ics na­tion­wide, 62 per­cent sup­port a change in policy, while 30 per­cent op­pose it. These num­bers are al­most identic­al to the Flor­ida at­ti­tudes.

Look­ing at spe­cif­ic policy op­tions, 62 per­cent na­tion­ally sup­port al­low­ing more Amer­ic­an com­pan­ies to do busi­ness in Cuba, while just 36 per­cent op­pose it. Look­ing at in­tens­ity, 35 per­cent strongly sup­port that op­tion; 24 per­cent strongly op­pose it. Among Flor­idi­ans, the over­all num­bers are 63 per­cent in sup­port, 32 per­cent op­pos­ing (with 40 per­cent strongly sup­port­ing a change, and 21 per­cent strongly op­pos­ing). Among Lati­nos na­tion­ally, 65 per­cent sup­port, and 32 per­cent op­pose (40 per­cent strongly sup­port; 20 per­cent strongly op­pose).

An­oth­er policy op­tion would be to re­move re­stric­tions on U.S. cit­izens spend­ing dol­lars in Cuba. Sixty-one per­cent sup­port such a policy change, while 35 per­cent op­pose it (35 per­cent strongly sup­port; 22 per­cent strongly op­pose). At­ti­tudes among Flor­idi­ans were quite sim­il­ar, with 63 per­cent in sup­port and 32 per­cent in op­pos­i­tion (40 per­cent strongly sup­port; 19 per­cent strongly op­pose). Lati­nos’ mar­gin of sup­port was even high­er, with 67 per­cent sup­port­ing and 29 per­cent op­pos­ing (38 per­cent strongly sup­port; 18 per­cent strongly op­pose).

An­oth­er ques­tion in the poll con­cerned re­mov­ing all re­stric­tions on travel to Cuba by U.S. cit­izens, an idea which was sup­por­ted by 61 per­cent na­tion­ally, and op­posed by only 36 per­cent (35 per­cent strongly sup­port; 20 per­cent strongly op­pose). Sup­port for travel was even high­er among Cuba’s next-door neigh­bors in Flor­ida, where 67 per­cent sup­port the lift­ing of travel re­stric­tions, and just 29 per­cent op­pose (38 per­cent strongly sup­port; 18 per­cent strongly op­pose). Fi­nally, the num­bers were very sim­il­ar among His­pan­ics, of whom 66 per­cent sup­port the idea, and just 31 per­cent op­pose it (37 per­cent strongly sup­port; 16 per­cent strongly op­pose).

The only ques­tion that was at all a close call was wheth­er to al­low Cuba ac­cess to high-speed In­ter­net tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions sys­tems based in the U.S., a ques­tion that just 52 per­cent of re­spond­ents sup­por­ted, with 43 per­cent op­pos­ing the idea. Al­though, again, the Flor­ida num­bers were more sup­port­ive of the In­ter­net ques­tion: 64 per­cent voiced sup­port, with only 28 per­cent op­pos­ing the no­tion. Among His­pan­ics it was 55 per­cent sup­port, 33 per­cent op­pose.

It is hard to ar­gue that U.S. policy to­ward Cuba has been any­thing but spec­tac­u­larly un­suc­cess­ful. Either Fi­del or Raul Castro has been in power since Feb­ru­ary 1959; so much for our isol­a­tion of Cuba destabil­iz­ing the Castro re­gimes. Years ago, a former Ca­na­dian am­bas­sad­or to Cuba told me privately that then-Prime Min­is­ter Fi­del Castro would have prob­ably been gone long ago, or at least big changes would have taken place on the is­land, if the U.S. had nor­mal­ized re­la­tions. He ar­gued that, with an in­creas­ingly glob­al eco­nomy and com­mu­nic­a­tions ad­vances, the same forces that helped East­ern European coun­tries shed the yoke of Com­mun­ism prob­ably would have helped trans­form Cuba as well, had it not al­ways had the U.S. to scape­goat for all of its prob­lems.

Some of Amer­ica’s strongest al­lies and most im­port­ant trad­ing part­ners are coun­tries that we once fought against and with which we had le­git­im­ate griev­ances at one point or an­oth­er. Even­tu­ally, however, na­tions have to move on; it’s time for the tiny band of in­transigent Cuban-Amer­ic­an politi­cians who are car­ry­ing on this fu­tile cru­sade to throw in the tow­el and ac­cept the new real­ity, or for oth­ers to just ig­nore them and forge a more ra­tion­al policy.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×