Could Tom Steyer’s Anti-Keystone Campaign Help Mary Landrieu? She Thinks So.

Senator Mary Landrieu (C), D-LA, speaks during a a press conference on the Keystone XL pipeline in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on February 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. Looking on are (from left): Senator Joe Manchin, D-WV, and Canada's Ambassador to the US Gary Doer. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Amy Harder
Feb. 17, 2014, 3:05 p.m.

Polit­ics are turn­ing up­side down in the Louisi­ana Sen­ate race, where Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bent Mary Landrieu finds her­self un­der at­tack from a deep-pock­eted and well-con­nec­ted en­vir­on­ment­al­ist.

Tom Stey­er, a bil­lion­aire hedge-fund in­vestor turned en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ist, may launch an ad­vert­ising cam­paign pan­ning Landrieu for sup­port­ing the Key­stone XL pipeline. The three-term sen­at­or seek­ing reelec­tion in a state much red­der than it was six years ago says Stey­er’s cri­ti­cism could ac­tu­ally help her win.

“It would prob­ably help me in my state if he would run his ads,” Landrieu said in an in­ter­view shortly after tak­ing the gavel to the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee last week. Her think­ing is that voters who live in a state de­pend­ent on oil and nat­ur­al gas like Louisi­ana would like a can­did­ate more if she’s fa­cing cri­ti­cism from the en­vir­on­ment­al Left for sup­port­ing a pro­ject that would foster more pet­ro­leum-re­lated en­ergy pro­duc­tion, which the 1,700-mile cross-bor­der pipeline would do.

Re­pub­lic­ans, who see win­ning Louisi­ana as a key step in their quest to re­gain con­trol of the Sen­ate, are spin­ning it the oth­er way. Rob Collins, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee, says that Stey­er could ac­tu­ally end up help­ing Landrieu’s main GOP chal­lenger, Rep. Bill Cas­sidy, win the race.

“Hav­ing a couple mil­lion dol­lars say­ing you’re do­ing the wrong thing on the en­vir­on­ment are dog-whistle ads,” Collins said in an in­ter­view. “People who care about the en­vir­on­ment will hear it, and those who don’t will miss it.” That means, Collins con­cluded, en­vir­on­ment-minded voters may stay at home, in­stead of vot­ing for Landrieu, whom they’re “pre­dis­posed” to vote for ini­tially. “It may not show up in the pro-Cas­sidy vote, but it could have the ef­fect of vote-com­press­ing” on Landrieu’s side, Collins said.

As for Landrieu’s line of think­ing — that Stey­er could ac­tu­ally help her win — Collins said: “I could see the lo­gic. I don’t think it ac­tu­ally bears out.”

Bri­an Wil­lis, a spokes­man rep­res­ent­ing Stey­er’s su­per PAC, Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate, de­clined to com­ment for this story. He also wouldn’t con­firm when Stey­er will de­cide wheth­er to tar­get Landrieu.

Tout­ing a web­site earli­er this month, Stey­er’s group is call­ing on In­ter­net users to help choose a can­did­ate for the group to tar­get in its next TV ad. Oth­ers on the list to choose from in­clude three Sen­ate hope­fuls: Rep. Shel­ley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.; former Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Mike Rounds of South Dakota; and Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga. An­oth­er po­ten­tial tar­get is Sen. Marco Ru­bio, R-Fla., who is up for reelec­tion in 2016.

Stey­er’s pre­vi­ous ef­forts in­clude cam­paigns cri­ti­ciz­ing the op­pon­ents of now-Sen. Ed­ward Mar­key, D-Mass., and Demo­crat­ic now-Gov. Terry McAul­life of Vir­gin­ia.

As the first and so far only Demo­crat in Stey­er’s line of fire this year, Landrieu is the most in­ter­est­ing — and ris­ki­est — po­ten­tial tar­get he’s con­sidered yet. Stey­er isn’t the only bil­lion­aire tar­get­ing Louisi­ana’s seni­or sen­at­or though.

Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, a con­ser­vat­ive or­gan­iz­a­tion fun­ded by the bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers, has already spent $2.6 mil­lion against her, fo­cus­ing mostly on her sup­port for Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law.

“I have bil­lion­aires on both sides, and I’m ex­actly where I should be, which is right in the middle,” Landrieu said. “I don’t think people are even­tu­ally go­ing to pay a lot of at­ten­tion to these bil­lion­aires on both sides.”

The Key­stone XL pipeline would send more than 700,000 bar­rels of oil a day from Canada’s tar sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies. The south­ern part of the pro­ject is already op­er­at­ing, but the top half needs ap­prov­al from the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to cross the Canada-U.S. bor­der. It’s been pending at the State De­part­ment for more than five years. A fi­nal de­cision could come as soon as this spring or sum­mer.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×