Begich Personifies Democratic Divide on Climate

ANCHORAGE, AK - JANUARY 18: Senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska) photographed near University Lake in Anchorage, Alaska, on January 18, 2013, in Anchorage, Alaska. Begich faces reelection in 2014. 
National Journal
Amy Harder
Feb. 6, 2014, 2:43 p.m.

For­get cli­mate-deny­ing Re­pub­lic­ans. Demo­crats face big di­vi­sions of their own about how to tackle glob­al warm­ing. And Sen. Mark Be­gich of Alaska, one of a hand­ful of vul­ner­able, mod­er­ate Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in an en­ergy-rich state, of­fers a glimpse in­to this split.

Be­gich, who ranks in the middle of the lib­er­al-con­ser­vat­ive spec­trum in Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s 2013 vote rat­ings for the Sen­ate re­leased Thursday, ac­know­ledges glob­al warm­ing is real. He reg­u­larly points out how Alaska is already be­ing af­fected by it, but he says politi­cians should dis­cuss cli­mate change in the con­text of sav­ing money and as­sess­ing risks, not car­bon emis­sions.

“You have to broaden the per­spect­ive and look at what’s the goal here,” Be­gich said in an in­ter­view. “If the goal is to lower emis­sions, that’s dis­con­nec­ted to most people. If the goal is to save tax­pay­ers’ money, now the pub­lic has some in­terest.”

Be­gich and oth­ers in a sim­il­ar spot like Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, and Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas were not among the 18 Demo­crats who un­veiled a cli­mate-change task force last month.

“The pur­pose is to use the bully pul­pit of our Sen­ate of­fices to achieve that wake-up call,” Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Box­er said at a brief­ing an­noun­cing the new ini­ti­at­ive. “We be­lieve that cli­mate change is a cata­strophe that is un­fold­ing be­fore our eyes, and we want Con­gress to take off the blind­folds.”

On Thursday, House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, who works with Box­er and Sen. Shel­don White­house, D-R.I., on cli­mate-change is­sues, an­nounced that he and oth­er House Demo­crats are go­ing to high­light the risks of cli­mate change in reg­u­lar op-eds in The Huff­ing­ton Post.

Their po­s­i­tions aren’t aligned with that of Be­gich, who says cost should be a more para­mount con­cern. “That’s how we should be talk­ing about this,” he said. “If we’re over here, and that’s why I have a little rub with the task force, if you’re just talk­ing about emis­sions, we un­der­stand that be­cause we talk in that lan­guage, but if you con­vert that to ‘Your in­sur­ance rates are go­ing up,’ or ‘That elec­tri­city bill could be lower,’ then sud­denly.”¦”

The task force launched by Box­er and White­house is “try­ing to put this is­sue back on the table, which I think is a fair dis­cus­sion,” Be­gich said.

When asked why he didn’t par­ti­cip­ate in the co­ali­tion’s press con­fer­ence, Be­gich re­spon­ded: “Prob­ably be­cause they know where I would be, and I would not be 100 per­cent in the dir­ec­tion of how they’re go­ing about it.”

He plans to show up at task force meet­ings, though, even if he’s not a form­al par­ti­cipant.

“I think it’s im­port­ant that they hear the broad per­spect­ive of how to deal with this from a state that’s ground zero on this,” said Be­gich, re­fer­ring to his im­promptu and un­of­fi­cial par­ti­cip­a­tion in pre­vi­ous cli­mate talks.

Con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist groups are hop­ing to use cli­mate change — and mod­er­ate Demo­crats’ pre­sumed sup­port for pri­cing car­bon emis­sions — as a polit­ic­al tool against them this cycle.

Be­gich said ac­know­ledging cli­mate change is real and sup­port­ing ac­tion (al­beit not a car­bon tax or cap-and-trade) doesn’t help or hurt him in his reelec­tion bid. “With my base, they’ll greatly ap­pre­ci­ate it, and with mod­er­ates, they’ll like it be­cause they un­der­stand it,” Be­gich said. “For people who are just anti-cli­mate change, well, it is what it is.”

While Demo­crats are split on what to do about cli­mate change, Re­pub­lic­ans are isol­ated al­most to the point of be­ing ir­rel­ev­ant. Many don’t talk about the is­sue at all, and most of those who do re­fuse to ac­know­ledge it is real and that burn­ing of fossil fuels is a big factor. That’s out of step with nearly 70 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans who say glob­al warm­ing is a real prob­lem, ac­cord­ing to a Pew Re­search poll last year.

Ben Geman contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×