Begich Personifies Democratic Divide on Climate

ANCHORAGE, AK - JANUARY 18: Senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska) photographed near University Lake in Anchorage, Alaska, on January 18, 2013, in Anchorage, Alaska. Begich faces reelection in 2014. 
National Journal
Amy Harder
Feb. 6, 2014, 2:43 p.m.

For­get cli­mate-deny­ing Re­pub­lic­ans. Demo­crats face big di­vi­sions of their own about how to tackle glob­al warm­ing. And Sen. Mark Be­gich of Alaska, one of a hand­ful of vul­ner­able, mod­er­ate Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in an en­ergy-rich state, of­fers a glimpse in­to this split.

Be­gich, who ranks in the middle of the lib­er­al-con­ser­vat­ive spec­trum in Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s 2013 vote rat­ings for the Sen­ate re­leased Thursday, ac­know­ledges glob­al warm­ing is real. He reg­u­larly points out how Alaska is already be­ing af­fected by it, but he says politi­cians should dis­cuss cli­mate change in the con­text of sav­ing money and as­sess­ing risks, not car­bon emis­sions.

“You have to broaden the per­spect­ive and look at what’s the goal here,” Be­gich said in an in­ter­view. “If the goal is to lower emis­sions, that’s dis­con­nec­ted to most people. If the goal is to save tax­pay­ers’ money, now the pub­lic has some in­terest.”

Be­gich and oth­ers in a sim­il­ar spot like Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, and Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas were not among the 18 Demo­crats who un­veiled a cli­mate-change task force last month.

“The pur­pose is to use the bully pul­pit of our Sen­ate of­fices to achieve that wake-up call,” Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Box­er said at a brief­ing an­noun­cing the new ini­ti­at­ive. “We be­lieve that cli­mate change is a cata­strophe that is un­fold­ing be­fore our eyes, and we want Con­gress to take off the blind­folds.”

On Thursday, House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, who works with Box­er and Sen. Shel­don White­house, D-R.I., on cli­mate-change is­sues, an­nounced that he and oth­er House Demo­crats are go­ing to high­light the risks of cli­mate change in reg­u­lar op-eds in The Huff­ing­ton Post.

Their po­s­i­tions aren’t aligned with that of Be­gich, who says cost should be a more para­mount con­cern. “That’s how we should be talk­ing about this,” he said. “If we’re over here, and that’s why I have a little rub with the task force, if you’re just talk­ing about emis­sions, we un­der­stand that be­cause we talk in that lan­guage, but if you con­vert that to ‘Your in­sur­ance rates are go­ing up,’ or ‘That elec­tri­city bill could be lower,’ then sud­denly.”¦”

The task force launched by Box­er and White­house is “try­ing to put this is­sue back on the table, which I think is a fair dis­cus­sion,” Be­gich said.

When asked why he didn’t par­ti­cip­ate in the co­ali­tion’s press con­fer­ence, Be­gich re­spon­ded: “Prob­ably be­cause they know where I would be, and I would not be 100 per­cent in the dir­ec­tion of how they’re go­ing about it.”

He plans to show up at task force meet­ings, though, even if he’s not a form­al par­ti­cipant.

“I think it’s im­port­ant that they hear the broad per­spect­ive of how to deal with this from a state that’s ground zero on this,” said Be­gich, re­fer­ring to his im­promptu and un­of­fi­cial par­ti­cip­a­tion in pre­vi­ous cli­mate talks.

Con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist groups are hop­ing to use cli­mate change — and mod­er­ate Demo­crats’ pre­sumed sup­port for pri­cing car­bon emis­sions — as a polit­ic­al tool against them this cycle.

Be­gich said ac­know­ledging cli­mate change is real and sup­port­ing ac­tion (al­beit not a car­bon tax or cap-and-trade) doesn’t help or hurt him in his reelec­tion bid. “With my base, they’ll greatly ap­pre­ci­ate it, and with mod­er­ates, they’ll like it be­cause they un­der­stand it,” Be­gich said. “For people who are just anti-cli­mate change, well, it is what it is.”

While Demo­crats are split on what to do about cli­mate change, Re­pub­lic­ans are isol­ated al­most to the point of be­ing ir­rel­ev­ant. Many don’t talk about the is­sue at all, and most of those who do re­fuse to ac­know­ledge it is real and that burn­ing of fossil fuels is a big factor. That’s out of step with nearly 70 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans who say glob­al warm­ing is a real prob­lem, ac­cord­ing to a Pew Re­search poll last year.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×