Senate Dems Very Carefully Plot 2014 Strategy

With midterms ahead, Democrats are avoiding divisive issues — and, in some cases, President Obama.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: (L-R) U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) arrive at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol January 16, 2014 in Washington, DC. Reid and other Senate Democratic leaders spoke on pending legislation to extend unemployment insurance. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalini
Jan. 30, 2014, 2:48 p.m.

Mind­ful of com­pet­it­ive races in con­ser­vat­ive states, Sen­ate Demo­crats are build­ing out an agenda for the rest of 2014, tak­ing up the pop­u­list parts of Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on and lay­ing aside is­sues that stir in­tra­party di­vi­sion.

Ex­posed on Obama­care and saddled with a still-slug­gish eco­nomy, Demo­crats have fo­cused on pock­et­book is­sues like the min­im­um wage and un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance. They said for weeks they would wait un­til the pres­id­ent’s ad­dress to lay out their full 2014 game plan.

Now they are ex­pand­ing their agenda to ac­com­mod­ate a gender wage-gap bill and will con­tin­ue to hash out the de­tails of their strategy at their an­nu­al re­treat next week at Na­tion­als Park.

“We are cer­tainly go­ing to be fo­cused on, along with the pres­id­ent, mak­ing sure the eco­nomy really works for every­one, the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, who along with Sen. Chuck Schu­mer of New York is or­gan­iz­ing the event again this year.

But don’t ex­pect Demo­crats to shep­herd each piece of the pres­id­ent’s agenda through the cham­ber. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, an op­pon­ent of fast-track­ing trade bills through Con­gress, dif­fers with Obama over the bi­par­tis­an Trade Pro­mo­tion Au­thor­ity le­gis­la­tion that House Ways and Means Chair­man Dave Camp and Sen­ate Fin­ance Chair­man Max Baucus un­veiled a few weeks ago.

Like­wise on Ir­an, a num­ber of Demo­crats have joined with Re­pub­lic­an Mark Kirk of Illinois seek­ing tight­er sanc­tions; though, un­like with TPA, Re­id has been will­ing up to this point to toe the White House’s line.

Des­pite the dif­fer­ences, Demo­crats are con­scious of present­ing a united front, a key con­trast with Re­pub­lic­ans whose split over le­gis­lat­ive tac­tics in the fall res­ul­ted in the shut­down and debt-ceil­ing crisis.

Demo­crats are not im­mune from dis­agree­ments with their col­leagues, though. A hand­ful of Demo­crats — Mark Be­gich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, and Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas — face gruel­ing reelec­tion con­tests in red states, and have been eager to con­trast them­selves with Obama and their lib­er­al col­leagues.

With the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity po­ten­tially on the line, Demo­crats are hon­ing a strategy aimed at avoid­ing di­vis­ive is­sues and em­bra­cing poll-tested meas­ures. So is there any con­cern that pur­su­ing Obama’s agenda could hurt vul­ner­able Demo­crats? Demo­crats say the an­swer de­pends on the is­sue.

“If we’re talk­ing about the min­im­um wage and col­lege af­ford­ab­il­ity and the long-term un­em­ployed, that’s an is­sue that cuts across every state,” said Sen. Chris Murphy of Con­necti­c­ut. “With those three is­sues? No.”

Demo­crat­ic lead­ers also are re­ject­ing the no­tion that the taint of push­ing the Obama agenda could hurt in the midterms, which do not his­tor­ic­ally fa­vor the party of pres­id­ents in their sixth year in of­fice.

“Just the op­pos­ite is true,” said As­sist­ant Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Dick Durbin. “Every one of them has said this is bring­ing it down to middle-class is­sues. Help­ing them earn more and be more se­cure are win­ning is­sues in Novem­ber.”

To that end, Re­id plans to bring a bill to the floor soon that Sen. Bar­bara Mikul­ski of Mary­land in­tro­duced a year ago. The Paycheck Fair­ness Act has 50 co­spon­sors, but Re­pub­lic­ans already blocked it once be­fore, sug­gest­ing that Demo­crats don’t ex­pect to see the le­gis­la­tion be­come law.

In­deed, House and Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans are not likely to give the sig­na­ture Demo­crat­ic ini­ti­at­ives the sup­port they’ll need to put them on the pres­id­ent’s desk.

Plus, des­pite a re­cent out­break of bi­par­tis­an co­oper­a­tion on budget and spend­ing meas­ures, Demo­crats are gear­ing up for a fight over the debt ceil­ing, warn­ing Re­pub­lic­ans they will not ne­go­ti­ate spend­ing cuts in ex­change for hik­ing the lim­it.

Bash­ing the GOP over the debt ceil­ing has be­come as much an ar­row in the Demo­crats’ polit­ic­al quiver as they ex­pect the eco­nom­ic is­sues will be. Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray of Wash­ing­ton has re­cently in­creased her pleas to Re­pub­lic­ans not to hold the debt lim­it “host­age,” and on Wed­nes­day Demo­crats met with Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew be­hind closed doors in the Cap­it­ol to dis­cuss the high-stakes dead­line, which he said could be reached in late Feb­ru­ary or early March, ac­cord­ing to Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aides.

“We just had a budget agree­ment. We have ap­pro­pri­ations; we de­term­ined where our spend­ing is go­ing to be,” Mur­ray said Wed­nes­day. “We have to pay our bills for that.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×