Senate Dems Very Carefully Plot 2014 Strategy

With midterms ahead, Democrats are avoiding divisive issues — and, in some cases, President Obama.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: (L-R) U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) arrive at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol January 16, 2014 in Washington, DC. Reid and other Senate Democratic leaders spoke on pending legislation to extend unemployment insurance. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalini
Jan. 30, 2014, 2:48 p.m.

Mind­ful of com­pet­it­ive races in con­ser­vat­ive states, Sen­ate Demo­crats are build­ing out an agenda for the rest of 2014, tak­ing up the pop­u­list parts of Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on and lay­ing aside is­sues that stir in­tra­party di­vi­sion.

Ex­posed on Obama­care and saddled with a still-slug­gish eco­nomy, Demo­crats have fo­cused on pock­et­book is­sues like the min­im­um wage and un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance. They said for weeks they would wait un­til the pres­id­ent’s ad­dress to lay out their full 2014 game plan.

Now they are ex­pand­ing their agenda to ac­com­mod­ate a gender wage-gap bill and will con­tin­ue to hash out the de­tails of their strategy at their an­nu­al re­treat next week at Na­tion­als Park.

“We are cer­tainly go­ing to be fo­cused on, along with the pres­id­ent, mak­ing sure the eco­nomy really works for every­one, the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, who along with Sen. Chuck Schu­mer of New York is or­gan­iz­ing the event again this year.

But don’t ex­pect Demo­crats to shep­herd each piece of the pres­id­ent’s agenda through the cham­ber. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, an op­pon­ent of fast-track­ing trade bills through Con­gress, dif­fers with Obama over the bi­par­tis­an Trade Pro­mo­tion Au­thor­ity le­gis­la­tion that House Ways and Means Chair­man Dave Camp and Sen­ate Fin­ance Chair­man Max Baucus un­veiled a few weeks ago.

Like­wise on Ir­an, a num­ber of Demo­crats have joined with Re­pub­lic­an Mark Kirk of Illinois seek­ing tight­er sanc­tions; though, un­like with TPA, Re­id has been will­ing up to this point to toe the White House’s line.

Des­pite the dif­fer­ences, Demo­crats are con­scious of present­ing a united front, a key con­trast with Re­pub­lic­ans whose split over le­gis­lat­ive tac­tics in the fall res­ul­ted in the shut­down and debt-ceil­ing crisis.

Demo­crats are not im­mune from dis­agree­ments with their col­leagues, though. A hand­ful of Demo­crats — Mark Be­gich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, and Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas — face gruel­ing reelec­tion con­tests in red states, and have been eager to con­trast them­selves with Obama and their lib­er­al col­leagues.

With the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity po­ten­tially on the line, Demo­crats are hon­ing a strategy aimed at avoid­ing di­vis­ive is­sues and em­bra­cing poll-tested meas­ures. So is there any con­cern that pur­su­ing Obama’s agenda could hurt vul­ner­able Demo­crats? Demo­crats say the an­swer de­pends on the is­sue.

“If we’re talk­ing about the min­im­um wage and col­lege af­ford­ab­il­ity and the long-term un­em­ployed, that’s an is­sue that cuts across every state,” said Sen. Chris Murphy of Con­necti­c­ut. “With those three is­sues? No.”

Demo­crat­ic lead­ers also are re­ject­ing the no­tion that the taint of push­ing the Obama agenda could hurt in the midterms, which do not his­tor­ic­ally fa­vor the party of pres­id­ents in their sixth year in of­fice.

“Just the op­pos­ite is true,” said As­sist­ant Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Dick Durbin. “Every one of them has said this is bring­ing it down to middle-class is­sues. Help­ing them earn more and be more se­cure are win­ning is­sues in Novem­ber.”

To that end, Re­id plans to bring a bill to the floor soon that Sen. Bar­bara Mikul­ski of Mary­land in­tro­duced a year ago. The Paycheck Fair­ness Act has 50 co­spon­sors, but Re­pub­lic­ans already blocked it once be­fore, sug­gest­ing that Demo­crats don’t ex­pect to see the le­gis­la­tion be­come law.

In­deed, House and Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans are not likely to give the sig­na­ture Demo­crat­ic ini­ti­at­ives the sup­port they’ll need to put them on the pres­id­ent’s desk.

Plus, des­pite a re­cent out­break of bi­par­tis­an co­oper­a­tion on budget and spend­ing meas­ures, Demo­crats are gear­ing up for a fight over the debt ceil­ing, warn­ing Re­pub­lic­ans they will not ne­go­ti­ate spend­ing cuts in ex­change for hik­ing the lim­it.

Bash­ing the GOP over the debt ceil­ing has be­come as much an ar­row in the Demo­crats’ polit­ic­al quiver as they ex­pect the eco­nom­ic is­sues will be. Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray of Wash­ing­ton has re­cently in­creased her pleas to Re­pub­lic­ans not to hold the debt lim­it “host­age,” and on Wed­nes­day Demo­crats met with Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew be­hind closed doors in the Cap­it­ol to dis­cuss the high-stakes dead­line, which he said could be reached in late Feb­ru­ary or early March, ac­cord­ing to Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aides.

“We just had a budget agree­ment. We have ap­pro­pri­ations; we de­term­ined where our spend­ing is go­ing to be,” Mur­ray said Wed­nes­day. “We have to pay our bills for that.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×