Three Months After Capitol Shooting, Investigators Remain Quiet

It has been 90 days since a woman was killed by police near the Capitol, and investigators have yet to release their findings.

A Capitol Police car and a black Infinity after Thursday's shooting on Capitol Hill.
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
Jan. 8, 2014, 3:59 p.m.

More than three months after an un­armed wo­man was killed in a hail of po­lice gun­fire on Cap­it­ol Hill, her fam­ily’s law­yer is call­ing for au­thor­it­ies to re­lease the res­ults of their in­vest­ig­a­tion, and for Con­gress to use its own powers to look in­to the case. And some law­makers agree.

“While we un­der­stand po­lice shoot­ings must be care­fully in­vest­ig­ated be­cause of their so­cial and polit­ic­al rami­fic­a­tions, by now there should have been a pre­lim­in­ary ana­lys­is re­leased in the pub­lic ven­ue,” Eric Sanders, a New York-based civil-rights law­yer, wrote on his firm’s web­site.

Au­thor­it­ies have been si­lent re­gard­ing any find­ings so far of their re­view of the Oct. 3 in­cid­ent, in which Miri­am Carey, a 34-year-old dent­al hy­gien­ist from Con­necti­c­ut, was killed after lead­ing po­lice in a car chase from the White House with her 14-month-old baby on board.

“I think three months is plenty,” said Rep. Raul Gri­jalva, an Ari­zona Demo­crat, adding that he agrees that it may be time for Con­gress to take its own look.

“It does con­cern me that 90 days — 3 months after the event — we’ve re­ceived no re­port,” said Rep. Hank John­son, a Geor­gia Demo­crat. “We would like to un­der­stand what happened that day.”

John­son ad­ded: “I am con­cerned about a mov­ing vehicle be­ing fired at — at a time when it was known a baby was in the car. There are a lot of ques­tions that need to be answered.”

Rep. Al­cee Hast­ings, a Flor­ida Demo­crat, said, “For something that is that im­port­ant, it would seem to me that the au­thor­it­ies would act ex­ped­i­tiously. I would hope they would make as much in­form­a­tion avail­able as they can im­me­di­ately.”

A spokes­man for the U.S. At­tor­ney’s Of­fice, Wil­li­am Miller, said the in­vest­ig­a­tion is con­tinu­ing, though he could not say when find­ings may be re­leased. “These in­vest­ig­a­tions do take time and are looked at very thor­oughly and care­fully,” Miller said.

Mean­while, an un­spe­cified num­ber of Cap­it­ol Po­lice of­ficers re­main on ad­min­is­trat­ive leave stem­ming from the in­cid­ent, which of­fi­cials say is the usu­al pro­ced­ure. Of­fi­cials at the U.S. Cap­it­ol Po­lice, Secret Ser­vice, and in both the Sen­ate and House either de­clined to com­ment on Wed­nes­day or said they had no in­form­a­tion to provide.

But Sanders has star­ted to agit­ate for find­ings to be re­leased, say­ing in an in­ter­view Wed­nes­day that the only of­fi­cial doc­u­ment he has ob­tained so far is a sworn af­fi­davit that was filed in U.S. Dis­trict Court in Wash­ing­ton seek­ing a search war­rant for Carey’s “per­son, place and things.”

Sanders also has pos­ted a memo on his firm’s web­site ques­tion­ing po­lice con­duct and ar­guing that the situ­ation was mis­handled.

For ex­ample, the af­fi­davit for the search war­rant al­leges that Carey “re­fused to stop” at a vehicle check­point near the White House and “made a U-turn” and al­legedly began to “flee,” he writes. But, Sanders ar­gues, “Turn­ing around and leav­ing is not vi­ol­at­ive of any laws. The ques­tion is: Why did po­lice pur­sue Miri­am?”

The af­fi­davit also men­tions that a Secret Ser­vice of­ficer ini­tially at­temp­ted to block her car with a bi­cycle rack, but the car pushed over the rack, knock­ing the of­ficer to the ground. It was from that point, after the in­cid­ent at the bar­ri­er at 15th and Pennsylvania Av­en­ue, that the chase began; shots were fired as the car con­tin­ued mov­ing, and Carey was shot to death after com­ing to a halt near the Cap­it­ol. The child is now with her fath­er, said Sanders.

Sanders, a former New York City po­lice of­ficer, says the af­fi­davit shows that “these po­lice of­ficers com­pletely mis­handled this simple ‘street en­counter.’” He also dis­misses the no­tion that Carey’s car it­self rep­res­en­ted, leg­ally, a “deadly weapon.”

“This is ser­i­ous, be­cause nev­er has there been an un­armed wo­man killed [near] the na­tion’s Cap­it­ol, right in front of the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity,” Sanders said in an in­ter­view. He ar­gues fur­ther in his post­ing that if people don’t see a prob­lem with what he calls the “si­lence” sur­round­ing this in­cid­ent, “We as a coun­try are in very ser­i­ous trouble.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×