More than three months after an unarmed woman was killed in a hail of police gunfire on Capitol Hill, her family’s lawyer is calling for authorities to release the results of their investigation, and for Congress to use its own powers to look into the case. And some lawmakers agree.
“While we understand police shootings must be carefully investigated because of their social and political ramifications, by now there should have been a preliminary analysis released in the public venue,” Eric Sanders, a New York-based civil-rights lawyer, wrote on his firm’s website.
Authorities have been silent regarding any findings so far of their review of the Oct. 3 incident, in which Miriam Carey, a 34-year-old dental hygienist from Connecticut, was killed after leading police in a car chase from the White House with her 14-month-old baby on board.
“I think three months is plenty,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat, adding that he agrees that it may be time for Congress to take its own look.
“It does concern me that 90 days — 3 months after the event — we’ve received no report,” said Rep. Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat. “We would like to understand what happened that day.”
Johnson added: “I am concerned about a moving vehicle being fired at — at a time when it was known a baby was in the car. There are a lot of questions that need to be answered.”
Rep. Alcee Hastings, a Florida Democrat, said, “For something that is that important, it would seem to me that the authorities would act expeditiously. I would hope they would make as much information available as they can immediately.”
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, William Miller, said the investigation is continuing, though he could not say when findings may be released. “These investigations do take time and are looked at very thoroughly and carefully,” Miller said.
Meanwhile, an unspecified number of Capitol Police officers remain on administrative leave stemming from the incident, which officials say is the usual procedure. Officials at the U.S. Capitol Police, Secret Service, and in both the Senate and House either declined to comment on Wednesday or said they had no information to provide.
But Sanders has started to agitate for findings to be released, saying in an interview Wednesday that the only official document he has obtained so far is a sworn affidavit that was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington seeking a search warrant for Carey’s “person, place and things.”
Sanders also has posted a memo on his firm’s website questioning police conduct and arguing that the situation was mishandled.
For example, the affidavit for the search warrant alleges that Carey “refused to stop” at a vehicle checkpoint near the White House and “made a U-turn” and allegedly began to “flee,” he writes. But, Sanders argues, “Turning around and leaving is not violative of any laws. The question is: Why did police pursue Miriam?”
The affidavit also mentions that a Secret Service officer initially attempted to block her car with a bicycle rack, but the car pushed over the rack, knocking the officer to the ground. It was from that point, after the incident at the barrier at 15th and Pennsylvania Avenue, that the chase began; shots were fired as the car continued moving, and Carey was shot to death after coming to a halt near the Capitol. The child is now with her father, said Sanders.
Sanders, a former New York City police officer, says the affidavit shows that “these police officers completely mishandled this simple ‘street encounter.’” He also dismisses the notion that Carey’s car itself represented, legally, a “deadly weapon.”
“This is serious, because never has there been an unarmed woman killed [near] the nation’s Capitol, right in front of the international community,” Sanders said in an interview. He argues further in his posting that if people don’t see a problem with what he calls the “silence” surrounding this incident, “We as a country are in very serious trouble.”
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”