Refiners Mull Lobbying Strategy on Crude-Oil Export Ban

None

RODEO, CA - JANUARY 25: Steam rises from stacks at the Conoco-Phillips refinery on January 25, 2011 in Rodeo, California. Gas prices continue to rise and have gone up 14% or $.39 a gallon over the past year. Crude oil is currently trading at just under $90 a barrell and some analysts speculate that it could skyrocket up above $150 a barrell in the coming year. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
National Journal
Amy Harder
Jan. 8, 2014, 3:59 p.m.

Go­ing against the vast ma­jor­ity of the oil in­dustry, a small group of re­finer­ies is plot­ting its way for­ward in the in­tensi­fy­ing de­bate over wheth­er to lift the dec­ades-old ban on crude-oil ex­ports.

In a call on Wed­nes­day, at least six in­de­pend­ent re­finery com­pan­ies and one air­line that owns a Phil­adelphia re­finery, Delta Air­lines, dis­cussed how much in­terest there was in or­gan­iz­ing a lob­by­ing ef­fort, ac­cord­ing to two in­dustry sources.

The par­ti­cipants in­cluded big names like Valero, Mara­thon Pet­ro­leum, and Delta, along with smal­ler com­pan­ies such as New Jer­sey-based PBF En­ergy and Phil­adelphia En­ergy Solu­tions (PES).

The com­pan­ies that are re­portedly plan­ning to take the lead are PBF En­ergy and Delta Air­lines, ac­cord­ing to an in­dustry source who was giv­en a readout of the call. Of­fi­cials of both com­pan­ies did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to re­quests for com­ment.

PES CEO Philip Rinaldi de­clined to com­ment about the call, but he in­dic­ated re­fin­ing crude oil be­fore ex­port­ing it ul­ti­mately helps the coun­try more. He ac­know­ledged it helps his com­pany’s bot­tom line, too.

“For the first time in a half cen­tury, there’s an op­por­tun­ity to re­store the coun­try to a man­u­fac­tur­ing-based eco­nomy, one where you add sig­ni­fic­ant value to cheap-based en­ergy and then ex­port that cheap en­ergy in the form of high-val­ued ad­ded product,” Rinaldi said in an in­ter­view Thursday. “As a large oil re­finer on the East Coast of the United States, that’s a policy that be­ne­fits my busi­ness. I re­cog­nize there is a busi­ness self-in­terest, but we think it’s the right thing to hap­pen for the coun­try too.”

A meet­ing is planned for next week in Wash­ing­ton to dis­cuss the po­ten­tial lob­by­ing ef­fort in more de­tail, ac­cord­ing to the in­dustry source. The source also said Valero and Mara­thon in­dic­ated they would not par­ti­cip­ate in the ef­fort.

Bill Day, a spokes­man for Valero, con­firmed the call oc­curred but did not provide de­tails. Day did say last week that his com­pany does not sup­port lift­ing the ban and in­stead sup­ports the cur­rent policy, which is that com­pan­ies must ap­ply for li­censes through the Com­merce De­part­ment to ex­port crude oil. Few of those li­censes are ap­proved, and most are to ship oil to Canada.

Na­tion­al Journ­al re­por­ted earli­er this week that a rift was brew­ing with­in the in­dustry between do­mest­ic re­finer­ies, such as the ones on Wed­nes­day’s call, and oil pro­du­cers, in­clud­ing U.S. com­pan­ies like Con­tin­ent­al Re­sources and in­ter­na­tion­al cor­por­a­tions like Ex­xon Mo­bil, which both pro­duce and re­fine oil. Be­cause the ex­port ban ap­plies only to crude oil, re­finers are profit­ing by ex­port­ing re­fined oil products like gas­ol­ine, dies­el, and jet fuel at re­cord rates amid the coun­try’s boom in oil pro­duc­tion, which is up 56 per­cent since 2008.

Calls to lift or at least re­vis­it the ban, which dates back to the af­ter­math of the 1973 oil em­bargo by Middle East pro­du­cers, have been grow­ing in the last couple of months. Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, threw her sup­port be­hind the policy change earli­er this week. When asked about the emer­ging rift, she re­spon­ded bluntly.

“They’re go­ing to have to deal with that with­in the in­dustry,” Murkowski said. “From a policy per­spect­ive, it’s good policy, again, to al­low for that level of trade. My in­terest is not to pro­tect the re­finer­ies’ bot­tom line.”

Re­finers that op­pose lift­ing the crude-ex­port ban won’t get much sup­port from their trade as­so­ci­ations. Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute CEO Jack Ger­ard said Tues­day that all of his more than 500 mem­ber com­pan­ies sup­port lift­ing the ban. Charlie Dre­vna, pres­id­ent of the Amer­ic­an Fuel and Pet­ro­chem­ic­al Man­u­fac­tur­ers, a smal­ler trade group rep­res­ent­ing primar­ily re­finer­ies, said last week his group’s of­fi­cial po­s­i­tion is to sup­port lift­ing the ban. Both lead­ers said their reas­ons were based on the no­tion that they sup­port a free mar­ket.

However, Dre­vna and Rinaldi of PES, soun­ded sim­il­ar tunes in cer­tain ways. They both called for a broad­er look at the de­bate rather than nar­row­ing lift­ing or chan­ging the crude-oil ex­port ban. They both said an­oth­er law gov­ern­ing the ship­ment of goods in U.S. wa­ters should be re­vis­ited as well. The Jones Act, dat­ing back more than 90 years, re­quires all goods — in­clud­ing en­ergy products — that are shipped in U.S. wa­ters from one part of the coun­try to an­oth­er to be trans­por­ted on a ves­sel built in the U.S.

“You have Jones Act re­stric­tions,” Rinaldi said. “How do you lift the ban and make this en­ergy cheap to every­body else in the world and then say ex­cept for oil re­finer­ies on the East Coast where we’re go­ing to pen­al­ize you an­oth­er five bucks a bar­rel by for­cing you on a Jones Act ves­sel?”

The re­finers’ po­ten­tial lob­by­ing ef­fort is still very much in its in­fancy stage, and how much if any trac­tion it gains is un­clear. For pre­ced­ent, the in­dustry doesn’t have to look far. Last year, a group of nat­ur­al-gas users, led by Dow Chem­ic­al, launched a co­ali­tion that op­poses a large in­crease in the amount of nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports, an­oth­er trend stem­ming from the coun­try’s skyrock­et­ing oil and nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion of the last sev­er­al years. Ex­ports of nat­ur­al gas don’t face a ban like crude oil, but they do face sig­ni­fic­ant re­stric­tions on ship­ments to coun­tries that are not free-trade part­ners with the U.S. Those with free-trade agree­ments, in­clud­ing Europe, Ja­pan, and In­dia, all want U.S. nat­ur­al gas. Dow and oth­er users of nat­ur­al gas are con­cerned ex­port­ing that fuel could in­crease do­mest­ic prices, which are not set on a glob­al mar­ket like oil.

Aside from this nas­cent lob­by­ing force, the grow­ing chor­us of voices call­ing to lift the crude-oil ex­port ban faces tough odds at chan­ging the status quo. The grid­locked Con­gress rarely changes long-stand­ing law, and end­ing the ban could be seen as threat­en­ing to in­crease gas­ol­ine prices, a po­tent polit­ic­al at­tack dur­ing an elec­tion year. Murkowski hopes the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion will be leg­ally able—and polit­ic­ally will­ing—to lift the ban it­self. But it’s un­clear wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion could or would do that. 

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×