Hardly a day or two goes by that a new poll isn’t released showing President Obama with the lowest job-approval rating of his presidency.
Of the major independent media polls using live interviewers, Obama’s highest recent approval ratings were 42 percent in the ABC News/Washington Post and NBC News/Wall Street Journal polls, with disapproval ratings of 55 and 51 percent, respectively. The lowest ratings among national adults were from CBS News and Fox News, where his approval ratings were at 37 and 40 percent, respectively, along with disapproval ratings of 57 and 55 percent. In between were three 41 percent polls, from CNN, Gallup, and Pew Research; disapprovals were 56, 52, and 53 percent, respectively. Obviously there isn’t a lot of disagreement between the various polls: The approvals average 41 percent and disapprovals 54 percent.
Democrats and Obama-backers protest loudly when any comparisons are drawn between the debacle surrounding the launch and first impressions of the Affordable Care Act and President George W. Bush’s presidential nadir, Hurricane Katrina. Of course, there are big differences between the two presidential stumbles, but similarly, in each case, public confidence in that president was seriously eroded, and questions about the administrations’ core competence and honesty became highly prevalent.
Of course, U.S. presidents often say or do things that the public disagrees with or disapproves of; that’s part of being an elected official. However, when voter confidence erodes, and when voters start questioning the competence and honesty of the president, that ground is very hard to regain. In Bush’s case, his approval rating just before his handling of Katrina became so broadly criticized was at 46 percent in a Sept. 8-11, 2005, Gallup Poll. His approval never exceeded 45 percent again during the remaining 40 months of his presidency. The tragedy of Hurricane Katrina was gradually forgotten, but the damage to the public’s confidence in Bush was never completely repaired.
How much resiliency Obama will have in the face of his current problems is obviously unknowable, and to a certain extent, will be dependent upon how fast the HealthCare.gov website is fixed and the extent to which other, more systemic problems are either resolved or addressed.
One critical problem is that the administration and backers of the ACA have never effectively drawn a connection in people’s minds between the element they favor the most — that is, not allowing preexisting medical conditions to affect their health insurance rates and coverage — and mandatory/universal coverage, the most despised part of the law. Mandatory coverage brings into the system the young and the healthy, and more importantly, the premiums they pay, which in turn allow and pay for coverage for those with preexisting conditions. That nexus, that trade-off, does not seem to have ever been successfully connected in people’s minds. Unless or until this disconnect is addressed, public acceptance of the ACA and approval of its sponsor will never be achieved.
A Nov. 18-20 poll for CNN by the Opinion Research Corporation tested whether respondents thought each of nine characteristics applied to Obama. His strongest marks were “is likeable” (71 percent said the quality applied, while 29 percent said it did not) and “has a vision for the country’s future,” (60 percent said it applied, 40 percent said it did not). Next, “cares about people like you” (52 percent said it applied, 48 percent said it did not), was followed by “is a strong and decisive leader,” and “is honest and trustworthy” (each had 46 percent apply, 53 percent did not apply). Near the worst of Obama’s ratings were “inspires confidence,” “generally agrees with you on issues you care about,” and “is a person you admire” (each garnering 44 percent saying the quality applied to the president, and 56 percent said it did not). Rock-bottom was “can manage the government effectively,” with just 40 percent saying that the characteristic applies, and a whopping 60 percent saying that it doesn’t.
While all of these characteristics are not equally important, being upside down in six out of nine certainly looks awful. The two sets of responses where the president fared the worst — “inspires confidence” and “can manage the government effectively” — are most concerning, while on top of that, poor marks in “is honest” and “is a strong and decisive leader” are also something that would cause me alarm if I were on the White House payroll.
One of the mistakes in politics most often committed is assuming that a situation and circumstances are static, that whatever people think now will remain the same indefinitely. Those who are declaring this a permanent mar on Obama’s presidency are surely risking that offense. On the other hand, another mistake is shrugging off problems and assuming that subsequent events will erase the memories of that which was unpopular. Just as Bush and his colleagues hoped and prayed that Katrina would be forgotten or forgiven — neither of which happened — our current president would like a mulligan on the Obamacare launch.
At this point, we just have to watch and wait to see if this administration can, and does, repair the damage.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."