As the debate over immigration continues to roil the Republican presidential field, a substantial majority of Americans say they would prefer to allow some or all illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, the latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll has found.
When asked what should be done with the roughly 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, just 25 percent of those polled said that they should all be deported “no matter how long they have been in the U.S.”
Another 28 percent of those surveyed said that all illegal immigrants should be allowed “to stay, provided they have broken no other laws and commit to learning English and U.S. history.” The largest group, at 39 percent, said that the United States should “deport some, but allow those who have been here for many years and have broken no other laws to stay here legally.”
The United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from Dec. 1 to 4; it interviewed 1,008 adults by landline and cell phone. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.
The poll’s three options on immigration correspond approximately to the positions of the three leading figures in the 2012 presidential race. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, now emerging as the GOP front-runner, has advocated the third option: He argues that longtime illegal immigrants who have broken no other laws should be granted a right to stay in the country, although without citizenship, by local community boards.
Mitt Romney, the erstwhile Republican front-runner, has aligned himself closest to the first option. He has said that Gingrich’s plan amounts to amnesty and that all illegal immigrants should receive no special privileges in applying for citizenship, although he has been somewhat vague on whether he believes they should be required to leave the country before doing so.
President Obama, like most Democrats, has argued that all illegal immigrants who have committed no other crime should be provided a pathway to citizenship, so long as they meet certain requirements, such as learning English.
In the survey, the views of Republican and Democratic voters diverged somewhat but generally overlapped more than the rhetoric of each party’s national leaders. This is consistent with other polling that has regularly shown that even a substantial portion of the GOP electorate views mass deportation as unworkable.
In the Congressional Connection Poll, just 33 percent of Republicans supported deporting all ilegal immigrants. That’s significantly more than the 15 percent of Democrats who backed that approach. In a roughly mirror image, just 19 percent of Republicans wanted to allow all illegal immigrants to stay, compared with 32 percent of Democrats. In both parties, though, the largest group aligned behind the choice Gingrich has championed: allowing long-term illegal immigrants who have not broken any other law to remain. Forty-three percent of Republicans and 42 percent of Democrats backed that option. Independents split almost evenly between the three options.
Similarly, while the results contained important racial differences, the gap was not as large as it was on some other issues. Even among whites, just 28 percent support deporting all illegal immigrants, while 24 percent want to allow all to remain, and 40 percent want to deport some.
The poll also found public skepticism about another conservative priority. Last month, the House passed legislation requiring any state that allows residents to carry concealed weapons to recognize the concealed-carry permits granted by every other state. That legislation attracted 58 votes when Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., offered it in the Senate in 2009, and his staff says he is considering options to attach the proposal to other legislation now.
The poll presented respondents with brief arguments for and against the idea, noting: “Supporters say this is necessary to ensure people authorized to carry concealed weapons in their own state can protect themselves wherever they are,” while “Opponents say it would undermine each state’s ability to set its own standards for who can carry guns, like age or training requirements.”
After hearing those arguments, 49 percent of adults said they opposed the legislation and believed it “should not become law.” Just 40 percent said they supported it. The idea precipitated a sharp gender gap: Although men supported it by a narrow 47 percent to 45 percent plurality, women opposed it by a solid 53 percent to 33 percent majority. Whites narrowly opposed the idea, while minorities resisted it by a larger margin.
Education among whites marked another important dividing line. The concealed-weapons bill drew support from a plurality of whites without four-year degrees (and support from nearly three-fifths of such noncollege men). Meanwhile, college-educated whites opposed the proposal by 2-to-1.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."