The Senate’s Scattershot Approach to Ferguson

Lawmakers are pursuing a subcommittee hearing, a bill, and review of a Defense program, but nothing is expected to pass when senators return in September.

A police officer keeps watch over demonstrators protesting the shooting death of teenager Michael Brown on August 13, 2014 in Ferguson, Missouri. Brown was shot and killed by a Ferguson police officer on Saturday. Ferguson, a St. Louis suburb, has experienced three days of violent protests since the killing.  
Getty Images
Michael Catalini
See more stories about...
Michael Catalini
Aug. 22, 2014, 1 a.m.

Even be­fore At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er and the Justice De­part­ment have wrapped up their in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the leth­al shoot­ing of Mi­chael Brown in Fer­guson, Mo., some sen­at­ors are plan­ning a le­gis­lat­ive re­sponse for when Con­gress re­turns next month.

No single meas­ure has so far emerged as a con­sensus le­gis­la­tion, and it’s un­clear wheth­er Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id in­tends to in­tro­duce any­thing in the Sen­ate. A spokes­man for Re­id did not com­ment.

But, in a sign that the emo­tions and out­cry around Fer­guson will carry in­to Septem­ber, some law­makers have already be­gun an­noun­cing their plans.

On Thursday, Demo­crat­ic Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri said she will con­vene a Fin­an­cial and Con­tract­ing Over­sight Sub­com­mit­tee hear­ing in Septem­ber to “ex­am­ine fed­er­al pro­grams that en­able loc­al po­lice de­part­ments to ac­quire mil­it­ary equip­ment,” ac­cord­ing to a state­ment from her of­fice.

That par­tic­u­lar is­sue has grabbed head­lines since Brown’s fatal shoot­ing by a Fer­guson po­lice of­ficer and dur­ing the en­su­ing protests, when of­ficers de­ployed what many de­scribed as mil­it­ar­ized equip­ment, in­clud­ing tear gas and rub­ber bul­lets.

In a show of just how high-pro­file Fer­guson and po­lice re­sponse have be­come, Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky, a po­ten­tial 2016 pres­id­en­tial con­tender, even penned an op-ed in Time un­der the head­line “We Must De­mil­it­ar­ize the Po­lice.”

Mc­Caskill plans to in­vite vari­ous stake­hold­ers to the hear­ing, ac­cord­ing to the state­ment, with more de­tails ex­pec­ted soon.

Still, a bill deal­ing with po­lice mil­it­ar­iz­a­tion seems un­likely to make it to the Sen­ate floor. In an in­ter­view with a Nevada tele­vi­sion sta­tion this week, Re­id soun­ded sup­port­ive of the use of mil­it­ary equip­ment in po­lice de­part­ments na­tion­wide.

“The is­sue is this: Wheth­er we should al­low sur­plus equip­ment the mil­it­ary has to go to po­lice de­part­ments. I say yes,” Re­id said on the show Nevada News­makers. “We have po­lice de­part­ments all over the coun­try, in­clud­ing those in Nevada, who are des­per­ate for more re­sources. And the mere fact that you have the equip­ment doesn’t mean that you have to use it.”

Des­pite Re­id’s po­s­i­tion, Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Carl Lev­in of Michigan prom­ised a re­view of the law that al­lows the Pentagon to sell its equip­ment to po­lice de­part­ments.

“We in­ten­ded this equip­ment to keep po­lice of­ficers and their com­munit­ies safe from heav­ily armed drug gangs and ter­ror­ist in­cid­ents,” Lev­in said in a state­ment. “Be­fore the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill comes to the Sen­ate floor, we will re­view this pro­gram to de­term­ine if equip­ment provided by the De­fense De­part­ment is be­ing used as in­ten­ded.”

It is a po­ten­tially cru­cial point, since both cham­bers of Con­gress and mem­bers of both parties as­sume the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion will be passed be­fore the end of the year.

Mean­while, in­de­pend­ent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Ver­mont linked the shoot­ing with youth un­em­ploy­ment and he plans to in­tro­duce le­gis­la­tion on that front. His pro­pos­al would in­clude $4 bil­lion to the Labor De­part­ment for grants aimed at set­ting up sum­mer and year-round job op­por­tun­it­ies for poor youth. His bill would also in­clude $1.5 bil­lion for com­pet­it­ive grants to loc­al com­munit­ies for work-based train­ing, ac­cord­ing to a let­ter Sanders sent to his col­leagues.

“If we are go­ing to re­duce youth vi­ol­ence and in­still hope and a bright fu­ture for the young people in this coun­try, we have got to provide them with the jobs and the skills they need to pay for a col­lege edu­ca­tion to and to move up the eco­nom­ic lad­der,” Sanders wrote.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×