Without providing details, House Ethics watchdogs confirmed Thursday they are reviewing separate matters involving whether Reps. Bobby Rush of Illinois and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky violated House rules.
Rush, a Democrat, himself acknowledged in a published report in April in the Chicago Sun-Times that he was under scrutiny over spending from his campaign fund and the handling of a $1 million grant.
And published accounts, beginning with a story late last year by Politico, have questioned Republican Whitfield’s support of controversial animal-welfare legislation pushed by his wife, a registered lobbyist with the Humane Society of the United States. The group’s legislative fund has donated at least $8,000 to Whitfield since 2011, when his wife began lobbying for it, according to the published reports.
In a statement, Whitfield responded that he was “disappointed that people with a financial interest in pending legislation have filed a complaint against me for my work on behalf of animals.” He did not explain further, but thanked the committee for noting in its announcement that ‘“the mere fact of a referral … does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the Committee.”
“As a reluctant participant in this process, I, too, will refrain from making any further public comments until such time as the Committee determines public statements are appropriate,” Whitfield said.
Friday’s announcement from the House Ethics Committee was the first official confirmation that he and Rush were both being scrutinized by the panel. The joint statement by the committee chairman, Mike Conaway, and the panel’s top Democrat, Linda Sanchez, said the cases were both referred by the Office of Congressional Ethics on June 10.
A spokeswoman for the OCE, which serves as an independent watchdog that serves as an initial vetter of ethics complaints, would not comment on its findings behind the referrals, provided in reports to the Ethics Committee.
Under House rules, the Ethics Committee now has until Nov. 10 to decide whether it will expand the two reviews by empaneling special investigative subcommittees. These subpanels would formally consider whether the two lawmakers broke House rules and, if so, possibly recommend punishment.
Neither Whitfield’s nor Rush’s office had any immediate comment Friday.
But news of the Rush probe came after the a Sun-Times/Better Government Association investigation late last year reported that he used campaign funds for the Beloved Community Christian Church, where he is a minister and that he did not report rent payments for his campaign office, possible ethics violations.
The Sun-Times/BGA report also questioned what had become of a $1 million grant that Rush helped secure from telecommunications firm SBC to launch a tech center in Chicago. The report said it was unclear where the money went, and that the tech center has not materialized. Rush was quoted as telling the newspaper “every penny of that money went toward programs for the Englewood community.”
Whitfield, in the Politico story in December, defended the interaction between his congressional duties and his wife’s lobbying””and said that anyone who doesn’t like it can file an ethics complaint against him.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."