House Ethics Panel Confirms Investigations of Rush, Whitfield

Whitfield: Poised to pounce on EPA.
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
July 25, 2014, 10:33 a.m.

Without provid­ing de­tails, House Eth­ics watch­dogs con­firmed Thursday they are re­view­ing sep­ar­ate mat­ters in­volving wheth­er Reps. Bobby Rush of Illinois and Ed Whit­field of Ken­tucky vi­ol­ated House rules.

Rush, a Demo­crat, him­self ac­know­ledged in a pub­lished re­port in April in the Chica­go Sun-Times that he was un­der scru­tiny over spend­ing from his cam­paign fund and the hand­ling of a $1 mil­lion grant.

And pub­lished ac­counts, be­gin­ning with a story late last year by Politico, have ques­tioned Re­pub­lic­an Whit­field’s sup­port of con­tro­ver­sial an­im­al-wel­fare le­gis­la­tion pushed by his wife, a re­gistered lob­by­ist with the Hu­mane So­ci­ety of the United States. The group’s le­gis­lat­ive fund has donated at least $8,000 to Whit­field since 2011, when his wife began lob­by­ing for it, ac­cord­ing to the pub­lished re­ports.

In a state­ment, Whit­field re­spon­ded that he was “dis­ap­poin­ted that people with a fin­an­cial in­terest in pending le­gis­la­tion have filed a com­plaint against me for my work on be­half of an­im­als.” He did not ex­plain fur­ther, but thanked the com­mit­tee for not­ing in its an­nounce­ment that ‘“the mere fact of a re­fer­ral … does not it­self in­dic­ate that any vi­ol­a­tion has oc­curred, or re­flect any judg­ment on be­half of the Com­mit­tee.”

“As a re­luct­ant par­ti­cipant in this pro­cess, I, too, will re­frain from mak­ing any fur­ther pub­lic com­ments un­til such time as the Com­mit­tee de­term­ines pub­lic state­ments are ap­pro­pri­ate,” Whit­field said.

Fri­day’s an­nounce­ment from the House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee was the first of­fi­cial con­firm­a­tion that he and Rush were both be­ing scru­tin­ized by the pan­el. The joint state­ment by the com­mit­tee chair­man, Mike Con­away, and the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, Linda Sanc­hez, said the cases were both re­ferred by the Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics on June 10.

A spokes­wo­man for the OCE, which serves as an in­de­pend­ent watch­dog that serves as an ini­tial vet­ter of eth­ics com­plaints, would not com­ment on its find­ings be­hind the re­fer­rals, provided in re­ports to the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee.

Un­der House rules, the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee now has un­til Nov. 10 to de­cide wheth­er it will ex­pand the two re­views by em­pan­el­ing spe­cial in­vest­ig­at­ive sub­com­mit­tees. These sub­pan­els would form­ally con­sider wheth­er the two law­makers broke House rules and, if so, pos­sibly re­com­mend pun­ish­ment. 

Neither Whit­field’s nor Rush’s of­fice had any im­me­di­ate com­ment Fri­day.

But news of the Rush probe came after the a Sun-Times/Bet­ter Gov­ern­ment As­so­ci­ation in­vest­ig­a­tion late last year re­por­ted that he used cam­paign funds for the Be­loved Com­munity Chris­ti­an Church, where he is a min­is­ter and that he did not re­port rent pay­ments for his cam­paign of­fice, pos­sible eth­ics vi­ol­a­tions.

The Sun-Times/BGA re­port also ques­tioned what had be­come of a $1 mil­lion grant that Rush helped se­cure from tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions firm SBC to launch a tech cen­ter in Chica­go. The re­port said it was un­clear where the money went, and that the tech cen­ter has not ma­ter­i­al­ized. Rush was quoted as telling the news­pa­per “every penny of that money went to­ward pro­grams for the Engle­wood com­munity.”

Whit­field, in the Politico story in Decem­ber, de­fen­ded the in­ter­ac­tion between his con­gres­sion­al du­ties and his wife’s lob­by­ing—and said that any­one who doesn’t like it can file an eth­ics com­plaint against him.

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
3 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×